Gustafson Lars, Erikson Catarina, Warkentin Siegbert, Brun Arne, Englund Elisabet, Passant Ulla
Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2010 Dec 30;2011:632604. doi: 10.4061/2011/632604.
Previous publications have shown a high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of three short clinical rating scales for Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and vascular dementia (VaD) validated against neuropathological (NP) diagnoses. In this study, the aim was to perform an exploratory factor analysis of the items in these clinical rating scales. The study included 190 patients with postmortem diagnoses of AD (n = 74), VaD (n = 33), mixed AD/VaD (n = 31), or FTD (n = 52). The factor analysis produced three strong factors. Factor 1 contained items describing cerebrovascular disease, similar to the Hachinski Ischemic Score. Factor 2 enclosed major clinical characteristics of FTD, and factor 3 showed a striking similarity to the AD scale. A fourth symptom cluster was described by perception and expression of emotions. The factor analyses strongly support the construct validity of the diagnostic rating scales.
先前的出版物表明,针对阿尔茨海默病(AD)、额颞叶痴呆(FTD)和血管性痴呆(VaD)的三种简短临床评定量表,相对于神经病理学(NP)诊断而言,具有较高的诊断敏感性和特异性。在本研究中,目的是对这些临床评定量表中的项目进行探索性因素分析。该研究纳入了190例经尸检诊断为AD(n = 74)、VaD(n = 33)、AD/VaD混合型(n = 31)或FTD(n = 52)的患者。因素分析产生了三个强因素。因素1包含描述脑血管疾病的项目,类似于哈金斯基缺血量表。因素2涵盖了FTD的主要临床特征,因素3与AD量表有显著相似性。第四个症状群由情绪的感知和表达来描述。因素分析有力地支持了诊断评定量表的结构效度。