• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准或小口径引流相比,疼痛更少,住院时间更短:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Urology. 2011 Jun;77(6):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.023. Epub 2011 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.023
PMID:21256562
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with standard or small-bore PCNL with a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

METHODS

All eligible studies were searched on MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Risk ratio (RR), mean difference, or standardized mean difference (SMD), with its 95% CI, was used to evaluate the size effect.

RESULTS

Ten and 3 trials were identified for comparison I (tubeless PCNL vs standard PCNL, 320 cases and 323 controls) and comparison II (tubeless PCNL vs small-bore PCNL, 55 cases and 54 controls), respectively. Tubeless PCNL required significantly less analgesia relative to standard PCNL (SMD -1.72; 95% CI -2.30 to 1.13; P(heterogeneity) = 0.04) and small-pore PCNL (SMD -0.69; 95% CI -1.13 to 2.05; P(heterogeneity) = 0.94). Furthermore, there was a remarkably shorter hospital stay in comparison I (SMD -1.35; 95% CI -1.40 to 1.30; P(heterogeneity) = 0.60) and comparison II (SMD -0.49; 95% CI -0.76 to 0.21; P(heterogeneity) = 0.15). The return to normal activity days was also significantly decreased in comparison I (SMD -4.34; 95% CI -6.28 to 2.41; P(heterogeneity) = 0.02). However, no significant difference was observed in the analyses concerning stone-free blood transfusion and complications rate in both comparisons. In subgroup analyses by nephrostomy diameter (22-Fr) and drainage methods, most results were consistent with the overall findings except for that to evaluate the operative time in the double-J stent subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Tubeless PCNL is associated with less pain and quicker recovery compared with standard or small-bore PCNL, in the management of uncomplicated renal calculi.

摘要

目的

通过荟萃分析随机对照试验,评估无管经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与标准或小口径 PCNL 的疗效和安全性。

方法

在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中搜索所有合格的研究。使用风险比(RR)、均数差或标准化均数差(SMD)及其 95%置信区间来评估效应大小。

结果

分别为比较 I(无管 PCNL 与标准 PCNL,320 例和 323 例对照)和比较 II(无管 PCNL 与小口径 PCNL,55 例和 54 例对照)确定了 10 项和 3 项试验。与标准 PCNL 相比,无管 PCNL 所需的镇痛明显减少(SMD-1.72;95%CI-2.30 至 1.13;P(异质性)=0.04)和小口径 PCNL(SMD-0.69;95%CI-1.13 至 2.05;P(异质性)=0.94)。此外,在比较 I(SMD-1.35;95%CI-1.40 至 1.30;P(异质性)=0.60)和比较 II(SMD-0.49;95%CI-0.76 至 0.21;P(异质性)=0.15)中,住院时间明显缩短。在比较 I(SMD-4.34;95%CI-6.28 至 2.41;P(异质性)=0.02)和比较 II(SMD-0.49;95%CI-0.76 至 0.21;P(异质性)=0.15)中,恢复正常活动的天数也显著减少。然而,在两次比较中,关于无石输血和并发症发生率的分析没有观察到显著差异。在经皮肾造瘘管直径(22-Fr)和引流方法的亚组分析中,除双 J 支架亚组评估手术时间的结果外,大多数结果与总体结果一致。

结论

与标准或小口径 PCNL 相比,无管 PCNL 可减轻疼痛,促进恢复,适用于治疗单纯性肾结石。

相似文献

1
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准或小口径引流相比,疼痛更少,住院时间更短:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Urology. 2011 Jun;77(6):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.023. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
2
Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.无管化与标准经皮肾镜碎石术:一项荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):918-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10463.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
3
Safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.双侧同期无管经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性
Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.064.
4
"Tubeless" percutaneous surgery: a new advance in the technique of percutaneous renal surgery.“无管”经皮手术:经皮肾手术技术的一项新进展。
Tech Urol. 1997 Spring;3(1):6-11.
5
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients.无管经皮肾镜取石术:454例患者的3年经验
BJU Int. 2009 Sep;104(6):840-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08496.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
6
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: outcomes with expanded indications.无管经皮肾镜取石术:扩展适应证的结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):204-11. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.10.
7
The efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无管经皮肾镜取石术的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Urol Res. 2011 Oct;39(5):401-10. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0355-5. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
8
[A meta-analysis of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrostolithotomy].[无管与标准经皮肾镜取石术的荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Jun 14;91(22):1555-60.
9
Does previous open nephrolithotomy affect the efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy?既往开放性肾切开取石术是否会影响无管化经皮肾镜取石术的疗效和安全性?
Urol Int. 2010;85(1):42-6. doi: 10.1159/000318188. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
10
A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.一项评估纤维蛋白封闭剂在无管经皮肾镜取石术中安全性和有效性的前瞻性随机试验。
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2488-92; discussion 2492-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.148.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Tubeless and Tubed Approaches in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Moderate Renal Calculi: Outcomes on Safety, Efficacy, Pain Management, Recovery Time, and Cost-Effectiveness.比较无管法与有管法在中度肾结石经皮肾镜取石术中的应用:安全性、有效性、疼痛管理、恢复时间及成本效益方面的结果
Cureus. 2023 May 19;15(5):e39211. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39211. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Outcome of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elder patients: A single-center experience from a developing country.老年患者无管经皮肾镜取石术的结局:来自一个发展中国家的单中心经验。
J Clin Transl Res. 2022 Mar 19;8(2):160-165. eCollection 2022 Apr 29.
3
Comparison of outcomes of tubed versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A single center study.
儿童带管与无管经皮肾镜取石术的疗效比较:一项单中心研究。
Turk J Urol. 2018 Jan;44(1):56-61. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.19616. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis.无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术:一项更新的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2.
5
Hemostatic agents for access tract in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is it worth?无管经皮肾镜取石术中通道止血剂的应用:是否值得?
Urol Ann. 2016 Apr-Jun;8(2):208-12. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.163796.
6
Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial.标准经皮肾镜取石术与无管微通道经皮肾镜取石术:一项随机对照试验。
Arab J Urol. 2016 Mar;14(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.005. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
7
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with non-absorbable hemostatic sealant (Quikclot®) versus nephrostomy tube placement: a propensity score-matched analysis.无管经皮肾镜取石术联合不可吸收止血密封剂(速即纱®)与肾造瘘管置入术的倾向评分匹配分析
Urolithiasis. 2015 Nov;43(6):527-33. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0796-y. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
Factors affecting complications according to the modified Clavien classification in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.完全仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中根据改良Clavien分类法影响并发症的因素。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):e83-92. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2248.
9
Hemostatic plug: novel technique for closure of percutaneous nephrostomy tract.止血栓:经皮肾造瘘通道闭合的新技术。
J Endourol. 2015 Mar;29(3):263-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0264. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
The effect of local anesthetic infiltration around nephrostomy tract on postoperative pain control after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后肾造瘘通道周围局部麻醉药浸润对术后疼痛控制的影响。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Aug;42(4):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0680-1. Epub 2014 Jul 3.