Sleeth Darrah K, Vincent James H
Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84108, USA.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jun;55(5):476-84. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq100. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
The current convention for sampling inhalable aerosols was based on several mannequin studies performed in wind tunnels at wind speeds between 0.5 and 4 m s(-1). In reality, as we now know, the wind speed in most modern indoor working environments is generally at or below ∼0.2 m s(-1). Inhalability studies performed in calm air aerosol chambers have shown that human aspiration efficiency at essentially zero wind speed is not consistent with the existing inhalable aerosol convention, calling into question the universal applicability of the current standard. More recently, experiments were carried out in a new hybrid wind tunnel-calm air chamber at more representative workplace wind speeds, between ∼0.1 and 0.5 m s(-1), to fill in this knowledge gap. Comparing these new data to both the existing inhalable aerosol convention and a recently proposed alternative for low wind movement suggests that, while the existing inhalable aerosol convention remains appropriate for wind speeds above ∼0.2 m s(-1), the modified version is more appropriate for the range below ∼0.2 m s(-1).
当前对可吸入气溶胶进行采样的惯例是基于在风洞中以0.5至4米/秒的风速进行的多项人体模型研究。实际上,正如我们现在所知,大多数现代室内工作环境中的风速通常处于或低于约0.2米/秒。在静风气溶胶室中进行的可吸入性研究表明,在基本为零风速时的人体吸入效率与现有的可吸入气溶胶惯例不一致,这使得当前标准的普遍适用性受到质疑。最近,在一个新的混合风洞 - 静气室中,以更具代表性的工作场所风速(约0.1至0.5米/秒)进行了实验,以填补这一知识空白。将这些新数据与现有的可吸入气溶胶惯例以及最近提出的针对低风速的替代方案进行比较表明,虽然现有的可吸入气溶胶惯例对于高于约0.2米/秒的风速仍然适用,但修改后的版本对于低于约0.2米/秒的范围更合适。