Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Montreal Chest Institute, Montreal, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 26;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-55.
The development of a successful new tuberculosis (TB) vaccine would circumvent many limitations of current diagnostic and treatment practices. However, vaccine development is complex and costly. We aimed to assess the potential cost effectiveness of novel vaccines for TB control in a sub-Saharan African country--Zambia--relative to the existing strategy of directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS) and current level of bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination coverage.
We conducted a decision analysis model-based simulation from the societal perspective, with a 3% discount rate and all costs expressed in 2007 US dollars. Health outcomes and costs were projected over a 30-year period, for persons born in Zambia (population 11,478,000 in 2005) in year 1. Initial development costs for single vaccination and prime-boost strategies were prorated to the Zambian share (0.398%) of global BCG vaccine coverage for newborns. Main outcome measures were TB-related morbidity, mortality, and costs over a range of potential scenarios for vaccine efficacy.
Relative to the status quo strategy, a BCG replacement vaccine administered at birth, with 70% efficacy in preventing rapid progression to TB disease after initial infection, is estimated to avert 932 TB cases and 422 TB-related deaths (prevention of 199 cases/100,000 vaccinated, and 90 deaths/100,000 vaccinated). This would result in estimated net savings of $3.6 million over 30 years for 468,073 Zambians born in year 1 of the simulation. The addition of a booster at age 10 results in estimated savings of $5.6 million compared to the status quo, averting 1,863 TB cases and 1,011 TB-related deaths (prevention of 398 cases/100,000 vaccinated, and of 216 deaths/100,000 vaccinated). With vaccination at birth alone, net savings would be realized within 1 year, whereas the prime-boost strategy would require an additional 5 years to realize savings, reflecting a greater initial development cost.
Investment in an improved TB vaccine is predicted to result in considerable cost savings, as well as a reduction in TB morbidity and TB-related mortality, when added to existing control strategies. For a vaccine with waning efficacy, a prime-boost strategy is more cost-effective in the long term.
开发一种成功的新型结核病(TB)疫苗将避免当前诊断和治疗方法的许多局限性。然而,疫苗的开发是复杂和昂贵的。我们的目的是评估在撒哈拉以南非洲国家赞比亚,新型疫苗控制结核病的潜在成本效益,与直接观察治疗短期疗程(DOTS)和当前卡介苗(BCG)接种覆盖率的现有策略相比。
我们从社会角度进行了基于决策分析模型的模拟,贴现率为 3%,所有成本均以 2007 年美元表示。在 30 年的时间里,对 2005 年出生于赞比亚(11478000 人)的人进行了健康结果和成本预测。初始疫苗接种和双疫苗接种策略的开发成本按全球新生儿 BCG 疫苗接种覆盖的赞比亚份额(0.398%)进行分配。主要结果是在疫苗效力的一系列潜在情况下,与结核病相关的发病率,死亡率和成本。
与现状策略相比,在出生时接种 BCG 替代疫苗,在初次感染后预防结核病快速进展的有效性为 70%,估计可预防 932 例结核病病例和 422 例与结核病相关的死亡(预防 199 例/ 100,000 人接种,90 例死亡/ 100,000 人接种)。这将导致模拟的第 1 年出生的 468073 名赞比亚人在 30 年内节省约 360 万美元。在 10 岁时添加加强针与现状相比可节省 560 万美元,可预防 1863 例结核病病例和 1011 例与结核病相关的死亡(预防 398 例/ 100,000 人接种,216 例死亡/ 100,000 人接种)。仅接种疫苗即可在 1 年内实现净储蓄,而双疫苗接种策略则需要另外 5 年才能实现储蓄,这反映了初始开发成本更高。
将改良的结核病疫苗纳入现有控制策略中,预计会带来可观的成本节省,并减少结核病发病率和与结核病相关的死亡率。对于效力逐渐减弱的疫苗,从长期来看,双疫苗接种策略更具成本效益。