• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在腐蚀性胃食管反流病中,对生理挑战无反应是食管动力的特征。

Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 Jun;23(6):517-e200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01669.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01669.x
PMID:21272162
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-specific esophageal dysmotility with impaired clearance is often present in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially those with erosive disease; however the physio-mechanic basis of esophageal dysfunction is not well defined.

METHODS

Retrospective assessment of patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD; n=20) and endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD; n=20) with pathologic acid exposure on pH studies (>4.2% time/24 h) and also healthy controls (n=20) studied by high resolution manometry. Esophageal motility in response to liquid and solid bolus swallows and multiple water swallows (MWS) was analyzed. Peristaltic dysfunction was defined as failed peristalsis, spasm, weak or poorly coordinated esophageal contraction (>3cm break in 30 mmHg isocontour).

KEY RESULTS

Peristaltic dysfunction was present in 33% of water swallows in controls, 56% ENRD and 76% ERD respectively (P<0.023 vs controls, P=0.185 vs ENRD). The proportion of effective peristaltic contractions improved with solid compared to liquid bolus in controls (18%vs 33%, P=0.082) and ENRD (22%vs 54%, P=0.046) but not ERD (62%vs 76%, P=0.438). Similarly, MWS was followed by effective peristalsis in 83% of controls and 70% ENRD but only 30% ERD patients (P<0.017 vs controls and P<0.031 vs ENRD). The association between acid exposure and dysmotility was closer for solid than liquid swallows (r=0.52 vs 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Peristaltic dysfunction is common in GERD. ERD patients are characterized by a failure to respond to the physiologic challenge of solid bolus and MWS that is likely also to impair clearance following reflux events and increase exposure to gastric refluxate.

摘要

背景

非特异性食管动力障碍伴清除功能障碍在胃食管反流病(GERD)患者中很常见,尤其是在有糜烂性疾病的患者中;然而,食管功能障碍的生理-力学基础尚不清楚。

方法

回顾性评估有糜烂性反流病(ERD;n=20)和内镜阴性反流病(ENRD;n=20)的患者,这些患者在 pH 研究中存在病理性酸暴露(>4.2%时间/24 小时),同时还纳入了健康对照组(n=20),所有患者均接受高分辨率测压检查。分析液体和固体团块吞咽以及多次水吞咽(MWS)时的食管运动。蠕动功能障碍定义为蠕动失败、痉挛、食管收缩弱或不协调(在 30mmHg 等压线上 3cm 内有中断)。

主要结果

对照组中 33%的水吞咽存在蠕动功能障碍,ENRD 为 56%,ERD 为 76%(P<0.023 与对照组相比,P=0.185 与 ENRD 相比)。与液体相比,固体团块吞咽时对照组(18%对 33%,P=0.082)和 ENRD(22%对 54%,P=0.046)中有效的蠕动收缩比例增加,但 ERD 患者中无明显变化(62%对 76%,P=0.438)。同样,MWS 后对照组中有 83%和 ENRD 中有 70%的患者出现有效的蠕动,而 ERD 患者仅有 30%(P<0.017 与对照组相比,P<0.031 与 ENRD 相比)。固体吞咽时酸暴露与动力障碍的相关性强于液体吞咽(r=0.52 对 0.27)。

结论

GERD 患者常存在蠕动功能障碍。ERD 患者的特点是固体团块和 MWS 不能引起生理反应,这可能也会影响反流事件后的清除功能,并增加胃反流物的暴露。

相似文献

1
Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease.在腐蚀性胃食管反流病中,对生理挑战无反应是食管动力的特征。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 Jun;23(6):517-e200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01669.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
2
[Long-term results of laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication in patients with esophageal reflux and disorders of esophageal peristalsis].[腹腔镜下部分后位胃底折叠术治疗食管反流和食管蠕动障碍患者的长期疗效]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2000 Jan 28;112(2):70-4.
3
Defective triggering of secondary peristalsis in patients with non-erosive reflux disease.非糜烂性反流病患者继发性蠕动触发功能障碍。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Dec;22(12):2208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04817.x.
4
Non-erosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux diseases: No difference with regard to reflux pattern and motility abnormalities.非糜烂性和糜烂性胃食管反流病:在反流模式和动力异常方面无差异。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(7):794-800. doi: 10.1080/00365520801908928.
5
Differences in esophageal corpus motility in patients with pathological and non-pathological gastroesophageal reflux.病理性和非病理性胃食管反流患者食管体部运动功能的差异
Med Sci Monit. 2006 Sep;12(9):CR387-92.
6
Mechanisms of gastroesophageal acid reflux and esophageal acid clearance in heartburn patients.烧心患者胃食管酸反流及食管酸清除机制
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Sep;91(9):1739-44.
7
Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high-resolution esophageal manometry.采用高分辨率食管测压法分析平滑肌收缩的节段间谷和近段潜伏期。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 May-Jun;46(5):375-81. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31823d3403.
8
Ineffective motility is not a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease.动力障碍并非胃食管反流病的标志物。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;98(4):771-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07391.x.
9
Development of esophageal peristalsis in preterm and term neonates.早产和足月新生儿食管蠕动的发育
Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(5):1718-25. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.042. Epub 2007 Mar 24.
10
Impact of transnasal ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy (UT-EGD) in the evaluation of esophageal peristaltic function.经鼻超薄食管胃十二指肠镜检查(UT-EGD)对食管蠕动功能评估的影响
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Dec;23 Suppl 2:S181-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05555.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study.芝加哥分类法第4.0版在食管测压中的真实世界应用:亚洲多中心研究
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jul 30;31(3):357-365. doi: 10.5056/jnm25010.
2
Esophageal motility disorders: a gastroenterologists' perspective for radiologists.食管动力障碍:胃肠病学家给放射科医生的视角
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug;50(8):3457-3466. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04793-9. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
Update Motility Disorders: Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease - Diagnostic and Conservative Approach.
动力障碍性疾病的最新进展:胃食管反流病——诊断与保守治疗方法
Visc Med. 2024 Dec;40(6):299-309. doi: 10.1159/000541358. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Coeliac disease is a strong risk factor for Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease while a gluten free diet is protective: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳糜泻是胃食管反流病的一个重要危险因素,而无麸质饮食具有保护作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 16;71:102577. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102577. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Esophageal motor abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disorders.胃食管反流病中的食管运动异常。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024 Mar 26;36(2):120-126. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_209_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
6
Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction Is Likely to Be a Local Manifestation of Other Primary Diseases: Analysis of Single-Center 4-Year Follow-Up Data.食管胃交界部流出道梗阻可能是其他原发性疾病的局部表现:单中心4年随访数据分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 10;13(14):2329. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142329.
7
Current advances in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病诊断与管理的当前进展
Tzu Chi Med J. 2022 May 16;34(4):402-408. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_323_21. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec.
8
Concise Review: Applicability of High-resolution Manometry in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.简要综述:高分辨率测压法在胃食管反流病中的适用性
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Oct 30;28(4):531-539. doi: 10.5056/jnm22082.
9
Dysphagia: Novel and Emerging Diagnostic Modalities.吞咽困难:新的和新兴的诊断方式。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;50(4):769-790. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
Clinical Characteristics of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Heartburn.烧心患者食管动力障碍的临床特征
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Oct 30;27(4):545-554. doi: 10.5056/jnm20131.