Wang Yan, Yu Ting, Zhu Feng, Xu Ying, Bao Yun, Zhang Ling, Lin Lin, Tang Yurong
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 440307, China.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 10;13(14):2329. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142329.
Whether esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a variant of achalasia cardia (AC) or an esophageal motility state of certain organic or systemic diseases remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the differences between EGJOO and AC in clinical characteristics and outcomes through a 4-year follow-up.
Patients diagnosed with primary EGJOO or AC were included. Based on the presence of concomitant disease, EGJOO patients were divided into a functional and an anatomical EGJOO group; similarly, patients with AC were divided into an AC with organic disease group and a true AC group. Disease characteristics and high-resolution manometry (HRM) parameters were retrospectively compared between the groups, and the development of organic diseases that could affect esophageal motility disorders and responses to treatment were examined during the follow-up. Symptom relief was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 after the treatment.
The study included 79 AC patients and 70 EGJOO patients. Compared with patients with AC, EGJOO patients were older, had shorter disease duration, a lower Eckardt score, and were more likely to have concurrent adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and autoimmune disease ( < 0.05 for all). The severity of dysphagia and Eckardt scores were higher in the anatomical EGJOO group than in the functional EGJOO group. Significant differences were seen in HRM parameters (UES residual pressure, LES basal pressure, and LES residual pressure) between AC and EGJOO patients. However, no significant differences in HRM parameters were observed between the functional EGJOO and anatomical EGJOO groups. Sixty-seven (95.71%) patients with EGJOO and sixty-nine (87.34%) patients with AC experienced symptom relief ( = 0.071). Among patients achieving symptom relief, a relatively large proportion of patients with EGJOO had symptom relief after medications (37/67, 55.22%), the resolution of potential reasons (7/67, 10.45%), and spontaneous relief (15/67, 22.39%), while more patients with AC had symptom relief after POEM (66/69, 95.65%). Among EGJOO patients achieving symptom relief, more patients (7/20, 35%) with anatomical EGJOO had symptom relief after the resolution of potential reasons for EGJOO, while more patients (32/47, 68.09%) with functional EGJOO had symptom relief with medications.
Concurrent AEG and autoimmune diseases are more likely in EGJOO than in AC. A considerable part of EGJOO may be the early manifestation of an organic disease. Anatomical EGJOO patients experience symptom improvement with the resolution of primary diseases, while most functional EGJOO patients experience symptom relief with pharmacotherapy alone or even without any treatment.
食管胃交界部流出道梗阻(EGJOO)是贲门失弛缓症(AC)的一种变异型,还是某些器质性或全身性疾病的食管动力状态,目前仍存在争议。我们旨在通过4年的随访研究EGJOO和AC在临床特征及预后方面的差异。
纳入诊断为原发性EGJOO或AC的患者。根据是否合并其他疾病,EGJOO患者分为功能性EGJOO组和解剖性EGJOO组;同样,AC患者分为合并器质性疾病的AC组和真性AC组。回顾性比较各组间的疾病特征和高分辨率测压(HRM)参数,并在随访期间观察可能影响食管动力障碍的器质性疾病的发生情况及治疗反应。症状缓解定义为治疗后埃卡德特评分≤3分。
本研究纳入79例AC患者和70例EGJOO患者。与AC患者相比,EGJOO患者年龄更大、病程更短、埃卡德特评分更低,且更易合并食管胃交界部腺癌(AEG)和自身免疫性疾病(所有比较P<0.05)。解剖性EGJOO组吞咽困难的严重程度和埃卡德特评分高于功能性EGJOO组。AC和EGJOO患者在HRM参数(UES残余压、LES基础压和LES残余压)方面存在显著差异。然而,功能性EGJOO组和解剖性EGJOO组之间在HRM参数上未观察到显著差异。67例(95.71%)EGJOO患者和69例(87.34%)AC患者症状得到缓解(P=0.071)。在症状缓解的患者中,EGJOO患者中有相对较大比例在药物治疗后症状缓解(37/67,55.22%)、潜在病因解除后缓解(7/67,10.45%)和自发缓解(15/67,22.39%),而AC患者更多在经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)后症状缓解(66/69,95.65%)。在症状缓解的EGJOO患者中,解剖性EGJOO患者中有更多患者(7/20,35%)在EGJOO潜在病因解除后症状缓解,而功能性EGJOO患者中有更多患者(32/47,68.09%)经药物治疗后症状缓解。
EGJOO患者比AC患者更易合并AEG和自身免疫性疾病。相当一部分EGJOO可能是器质性疾病的早期表现。解剖性EGJOO患者随着原发性疾病的解除症状改善,而大多数功能性EGJOO患者仅通过药物治疗甚至无需任何治疗症状即可缓解。