Suppr超能文献

卵巢癌筛查。

Screening for ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of OB/GYN, University of Arizona, 1515 N. Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2011 Jan;18(1):16-21. doi: 10.1177/107327481101800103.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer remains the most deadly of the gynecologic cancers. It is difficult to diagnose until in advanced stages. An effective screening test may help to decrease mortality from ovarian cancer. Due to the low incidence of ovarian cancer in the general population, a good screening test must have high sensitivity and specificity to allow accurate detection without excessive false-positive results. Thus, effective screening for ovarian cancer has remained elusive.

METHODS

Studies evaluating screening methods for ovarian cancer are reviewed. Screening methods investigated include ultrasound, CA-125, and serum proteins.

RESULTS

The use of CA-125 or ultrasound alone does not result in adequate sensitivity or specificity for routine screening. A combination of the two modalities improves sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Using a combination of serum proteins may also improve sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, but such studies have yet to be validated.

CONCLUSIONS

No effective screening methods for ovarian cancer that have been adequately validated are available. Routine screening for ovarian cancer in the general population is not currently recommended.

摘要

背景

卵巢癌仍然是妇科癌症中最致命的一种。在晚期之前很难诊断出来。有效的筛查测试可能有助于降低卵巢癌的死亡率。由于卵巢癌在普通人群中的发病率较低,因此良好的筛查测试必须具有高灵敏度和特异性,以便在不产生过多假阳性结果的情况下进行准确检测。因此,有效的卵巢癌筛查仍然难以实现。

方法

对评估卵巢癌筛查方法的研究进行了回顾。研究的筛查方法包括超声、CA-125 和血清蛋白。

结果

单独使用 CA-125 或超声并不能提供足够的敏感性或特异性用于常规筛查。两种方式的结合提高了敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。使用血清蛋白的组合也可能提高敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值,但此类研究尚待验证。

结论

目前尚无经过充分验证的有效卵巢癌筛查方法。不建议在普通人群中常规筛查卵巢癌。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验