Occupational Medicine Service, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Mar;21 Suppl 1:S28-34. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9286-4.
This paper reviews the development of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong, both in terms of the science as well as the service for injured workers. Besides, it also reviews the existing Employees' Compensation Ordinance for work injury to illustrate how the policy could influence the success and development of the discipline.
Five experienced occupational rehabilitation providers, including 1 occupational medicine specialist, 3 occupational therapists, and 1 physiotherapist critically reviewed the past and current development of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong as well as the local contextual factors, which could influence its future development.
Since the enactment of the Employees' Compensation Ordinance in the 1950s, there have been progressive improvements in the field of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong. Services in the early years were mostly based on the biomedical model, where doctors and patients tended to focus on clinical symptoms and physical pathology when making clinical decisions. Since then, remarkable academic achievements have been made in the field locally, from the validation of clinical instruments for assessment of work capacity, assessment of employment readiness to the evaluation of efficacy of interventional programs for injured workers focusing on work related outcomes. However, there has been a relatively lack of progress in the development of related policies and implementation of related programs for occupational rehabilitation. There is no built in linkage between rehabilitation, compensation and prevention in the current system in Hong Kong, and there is no rehabilitation policy specific to those workers with occupational diseases and injuries.
There are still deficiencies in the development and provision of occupational rehabilitation services in Hong Kong. Incorporation of requirements for occupational rehabilitation at the legislation and policy levels should be seriously considered in the future. Besides, the development of the Occupational Medicine subspecialty in the public hospital system in Hong Kong is considered a facilitator to the future development of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong.
本文回顾了香港职业康复的发展,既包括科学方面,也包括工伤工人的服务。此外,还审查了现有的《雇员补偿条例》对工伤的规定,以说明政策如何影响该学科的成功和发展。
五名经验丰富的职业康复提供者,包括 1 名职业医学专家、3 名职业治疗师和 1 名物理治疗师,批判性地审查了香港职业康复的过去和现状发展以及可能影响其未来发展的当地背景因素。
自 20 世纪 50 年代《雇员补偿条例》颁布以来,香港职业康复领域取得了逐步进展。早年的服务主要基于生物医学模式,医生和患者在做出临床决策时往往侧重于临床症状和身体病理学。从那时起,香港本地在该领域取得了显著的学术成就,包括工作能力评估临床工具的验证、就业准备评估以及针对关注工作相关结果的工伤工人的干预计划效果评估。然而,在职业康复相关政策的制定和实施方面,进展相对缓慢。在香港现行制度中,康复、补偿和预防之间没有内在联系,也没有针对职业病和工伤工人的专门康复政策。
香港职业康复服务的发展和提供仍存在不足。在未来,应认真考虑在立法和政策层面纳入职业康复的要求。此外,香港公立医院系统中职业医学专科的发展被认为是香港职业康复未来发展的促进因素。