Department of Endocrinology and Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Cancer Section, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):526-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
The therapeutic scenario for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been evolving rapidly, with sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab, everolimus, pazopanib, and temsirolimus being successfully tested and approved in a short period of time. Oncologists must be familiar with the management of toxicity that these biologic agents cause, as such toxicity is different from that of conventional chemotherapeutic agents.
To describe toxic effects associated with targeted therapy of mRCC and their proper management on the basis of currently available evidence.
We conducted a systematic analysis of the literature on 15th October 2010 by performing a search of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) on PubMed using the words sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, everolimus, pazopanib, or temsirolimus combined with the MeSH term kidney neoplasms. Consideration for inclusion was given to articles providing data concerning (1) incidence and grading and (2) management of targeted therapy-related toxic effects. A separate search was conducted on PubMed to retrieve meta-analyses using each drug name and the word meta-analysis.
Hypertension, fatigue, bone marrow toxicity, skin toxicity, and gastrointestinal side-effects are common with the six targeted agents. Everolimus and temsirolimus are associated with immunosuppression, metabolic alterations, and interstitial pneumonitis, while sunitinib is associated with hypothyroidism. Recommendations for treating these conditions usually follow those for the general population because of the lack of experimental data in this setting (eg, for management of sunitinib-induced hypertension).
The treating oncologist should try to manage side-effects associated with targeted therapy using supportive and pharmacologic interventions. Severe toxicity requires external specialist consultation and treatment suspension and/or dose reduction. Experimental data about the management of targeted therapy-related toxicity in mRCC is lacking and required in this setting.
转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗方案迅速发展,舒尼替尼、索拉非尼、贝伐单抗、依维莫司、帕唑帕尼和替西罗莫司在短时间内成功地经过测试和批准。肿瘤学家必须熟悉这些生物制剂引起的毒性管理,因为这种毒性与传统的化疗药物不同。
根据现有证据,描述 mRCC 靶向治疗相关的毒性作用及其适当的管理。
我们于 2010 年 10 月 15 日通过在 PubMed 上使用索拉非尼、舒尼替尼、贝伐单抗、依维莫司、帕唑帕尼或替西罗莫司与 MeSH 术语“肾肿瘤”组合进行了主题词(MeSH)的系统文献分析。纳入的文章提供了有关(1)发病率和分级和(2)靶向治疗相关毒性作用管理的数据。我们还在 PubMed 上进行了单独的搜索,以检索使用每种药物名称和“meta 分析”一词的 meta 分析。
高血压、疲劳、骨髓毒性、皮肤毒性和胃肠道副作用是六种靶向药物常见的副作用。依维莫司和替西罗莫司与免疫抑制、代谢改变和间质性肺炎有关,而舒尼替尼与甲状腺功能减退有关。由于缺乏实验数据(例如,用于治疗舒尼替尼引起的高血压),通常遵循一般人群的建议来治疗这些情况。
治疗肿瘤学家应尝试使用支持性和药物干预来管理靶向治疗相关的副作用。严重的毒性需要外部专家咨询和治疗暂停和/或剂量减少。mRCC 中靶向治疗相关毒性管理的实验数据缺乏,在此情况下需要。