Suppr超能文献

多重免疫分析平台的准确性和可重复性:验证研究。

Accuracy and reproducibility of a multiplex immunoassay platform: a validation study.

机构信息

Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, United States.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 2011 Mar 31;367(1-2):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiplex immunoassays offer many advantages over singleplex assays for the analysis of multiple analytes in a single sample. We sought to validate a specific multiplex cytokine immunoassay (Human 9-plex cytokine array on the Searchlight® platform by Thermoscientific) prior to use in a large clinical study.

METHODS

We compared spike and recovery of recombinant proteins on the Searchlight® platform to singleplex immunoassays purchased from R&D Systems, measured identical patient samples on the two different platforms, and measured identical patient samples on different days to measure intra- and inter-assay variability.

RESULTS

Assays using the Searchlight® platform had inefficient recovery of spiked recombinant proteins compared to R&D Systems singleplex assays. Assaying identical patients samples on different days on the Searchlight platform had acceptable intra-assay variability (intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV%) range for all analytes of 9.1-13.7) but unacceptably high inter-assay variability (CV% range for all analytes 16.7-119.3) suggesting plate-to plate variability. Similar assays for individual cytokines on the R&D platform had an intra-assay CV% range of 1.6-6.4 and an inter-assay CV% range of 3.8-7.1. Some deficiencies in Searchlight® assay performance may be due to irregularities in spotting of capture antibodies during manufacturing.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the Searchlight® multiplex immunoassay platform would require extensive additional assay optimization prior to widespread clinical research use.

摘要

背景

与单重分析相比,多重免疫分析在单个样本中分析多个分析物具有许多优势。我们在将其用于大型临床研究之前,寻求对特定的多重细胞因子免疫分析(Thermoscientific 的 Searchlight®平台上的人 9 重细胞因子阵列)进行验证。

方法

我们比较了 Searchlight®平台上的重组蛋白加标回收率和从 R&D Systems 购买的单重免疫分析,在两个不同平台上测量相同的患者样本,并在不同天测量相同的患者样本以测量内和分析间变异性。

结果

与 R&D Systems 单重分析相比,Searchlight®平台上的分析对加标重组蛋白的回收率效率较低。在 Searchlight 平台上不同天检测相同的患者样本具有可接受的日内变异性(所有分析物的日内变异系数 (CV%)范围为 9.1-13.7),但分析间变异性不可接受(所有分析物的 CV%范围为 16.7-119.3),表明板间变异性。R&D 平台上个别细胞因子的类似分析,其日内 CV%范围为 1.6-6.4,分析间 CV%范围为 3.8-7.1。Searchlight®分析性能的一些缺陷可能是由于在制造过程中捕获抗体的点样不规则所致。

结论

我们得出结论,在广泛用于临床研究之前,Searchlight®多重免疫分析平台需要进行广泛的额外分析优化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验