• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析癌症患者对肿瘤医生信任的影响因素:一项定性研究。

Disentangling cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2012 Apr;21(4):392-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1910. Epub 2011 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1002/pon.1910
PMID:21280138
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients' trust in their physician is crucial for an optimal treatment. Yet, among oncology patients, for whom trust might be especially important, research into trust is limited. A qualitative interview study was carried out to investigate (1) to what extent aspects of trust important to cancer patients reflect the aspects described in other patient populations and (2) which additional themes emerge.

METHODS

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were performed with a purposefully selected heterogeneous sample of 29 cancer patients. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using MAXqda. Data were clustered across interviews to derive common themes related to trust.

RESULTS

Three commonly described aspects, i.e., fidelity, competence and honesty, were strongly reflected in patients' accounts of trust in their oncologist. Confidentiality was irrelevant to many. An additional aspect, labeled 'caring', was distinguished. Central to the accounts of these patients was their need to trust the oncologist, arising from the severe and life-threatening nature of their disease. This necessity to trust led to the quick establishment of a competence-based trust alliance. A deeper, more emotional bond of trust was developed only after repeated interaction and seemed primarily based on the oncologist's interpersonal skills.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for trust encountered in this study underscores the power imbalance between cancer patients and their oncologist. Additionally, these results imply that when aiming to measure cancer patients' trust, what we might actually be assessing is patients' intention and determination to trust their oncologist.

摘要

目的

患者对医生的信任对于最佳治疗至关重要。然而,在肿瘤患者中,信任可能尤为重要,但对信任的研究却很有限。本研究进行了一项定性访谈研究,旨在调查:(1)对癌症患者重要的信任方面在多大程度上反映了其他患者群体中描述的方面;(2)出现了哪些额外的主题。

方法

对 29 名癌症患者进行了有目的选择的异质样本的深入半结构化访谈。使用 MAXqda 对转录的访谈进行了分析。对数据进行了聚类分析,以得出与信任相关的常见主题。

结果

三个普遍描述的方面,即忠诚、能力和诚实,在患者对肿瘤医生的信任中得到了强烈的体现。许多患者认为保密性并不重要。还区分了一个额外的方面,称为“关怀”。对这些患者而言,信任肿瘤医生是至关重要的,这是由于他们的疾病严重且危及生命。这种对信任的需求导致了以能力为基础的信任联盟的快速建立。更深层次、更情绪化的信任纽带只有在反复互动后才会发展,并且似乎主要基于肿瘤医生的人际交往能力。

结论

本研究中遇到的对信任的需求强调了癌症患者与肿瘤医生之间的权力不平衡。此外,这些结果表明,当我们旨在衡量癌症患者的信任时,我们实际上可能评估的是患者信任其肿瘤医生的意愿和决心。

相似文献

1
Disentangling cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: a qualitative study.解析癌症患者对肿瘤医生信任的影响因素:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2012 Apr;21(4):392-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1910. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
2
How can communication by oncologists enhance patients' trust? An experimental study.肿瘤学家的沟通如何增强患者的信任?一项实验研究。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Apr;25(4):896-901. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu027. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
3
Community dwelling adults' perception of interpersonal trust vs. trust in health care providers.社区居住成年人对人际信任与对医疗服务提供者信任的认知。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Sep;15(9):1132-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01386.x.
4
Does source of patient recruitment affect the impact of communication on trust?患者招募来源会影响沟通对信任的影响吗?
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Cancer patients' trust in their physician-a review.癌症患者对医生的信任——综述
Psychooncology. 2011 Mar;20(3):227-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.1745.
6
How attachment style and locus of control influence patients' trust in their oncologist.依恋风格和控制源如何影响患者对肿瘤医生的信任。
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Mar;76(3):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
7
Mandates of trust in the doctor-patient relationship.医患关系中的信任授权。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Sep;21(9):1182-90. doi: 10.1177/1049732311405685. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
8
Caring in nursing: investigating the meaning of caring from the perspective of cancer patients in Beijing, China.护理中的关怀:从中国北京癌症患者的视角探究关怀的意义。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Feb;15(2):188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01291.x.
9
[Trust of Turkish and Arabic ethnic minority patients in their Dutch oncologist].[土耳其和阿拉伯少数民族患者对其荷兰肿瘤医生的信任]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(16):A5881.
10
[Communication skills in oncologist's work].[肿瘤学家工作中的沟通技巧]
Vopr Onkol. 2014;60(5):643-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Mistrust in Online Cancer Communities: A Large-Scale Analysis Across 10 Cancer Entities.在线癌症社区中的医疗不信任:对10种癌症实体的大规模分析。
Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70180. doi: 10.1002/pon.70180.
2
Defer, Share, or Drive the Decision: Empowering Patients with Varied Preferences to Engage in Decision-making (an Analysis from Alliance A231701CD).推迟、共享或主导决策:使偏好各异的患者能够参与决策制定(来自联盟A231701CD的分析)
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006648.
3
Functions of patient- and family-centered pediatric cancer communication in Pakistan.
巴基斯坦以患者和家庭为中心的儿科癌症沟通的作用。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 11;14:1393908. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1393908. eCollection 2024.
4
Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.对医学的信任:旨在衡量对医疗保健研究信任度的工具的范围综述
J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):116-137. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Measuring trust in one's physician: A scoping review.测量对医生的信任:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0303840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303840. eCollection 2024.
6
Disentangling trust of patients with rare cancer in their healthcare professionals and the healthcare system: a qualitative interview study.剖析罕见癌症患者对其医疗保健专业人员及医疗保健系统的信任:一项定性访谈研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun;19(3):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01531-w. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
7
How shared is decision-making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study.多学科肿瘤会议中是否有患者参与的决策共享?一项观察性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3297-3306. doi: 10.1111/hex.13638. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
8
Death and the treatment imperative: Decision-making in late-stage cancer.死亡与治疗紧迫性:晚期癌症的决策制定。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;306:115129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115129. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
9
Towards a novel approach guiding the decision-making process for anticancer treatment in patients with advanced cancer: framework for systemic anticancer treatment with palliative intent.一种指导晚期癌症患者抗癌治疗决策过程的新方法:以姑息为目的的全身性抗癌治疗框架。
ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100496. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100496. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Clinician-Expressed Empathy in Advanced Cancer Consultations and Associations with Patient Outcomes.患者与临床医生对晚期癌症会诊中临床医生所表达同理心的认知及其与患者预后的关联
Palliat Med Rep. 2020 Jun 11;1(1):76-83. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0052. eCollection 2020.