Suppr超能文献

原发性肺静脉狭窄:无缝线修复对生存率的影响。

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis: the impact of sutureless repair on survival.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Aug;142(2):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis is often associated with relentless restenosis and early death. During the last 2 decades, we have developed a sutureless repair to improve prognosis.

METHODS

Hospital records for patients undergoing repair of primary pulmonary vein stenosis from 1989 to 2008 were reviewed. Pulmonary vein stenosis was quantified with a pulmonary vein stenosis score. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients underwent surgical repair. Mean ages at diagnosis and index repair were 23.3 ± 45.6 and 24.1 ± 40.9 months, respectively. Systemic or suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures were present in 13 of 18 patients (72%). Seven (31%) had single-ventricle circulation. A sutureless technique was used in 19 of 23 cases (83%). Other types of repair were used in 4 of 23 (17%). There were 11 recorded deaths (47%). Survivals were 64%, 47%, and 31% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Five patients (22%) required 1 reintervention. Surgical repair significantly reduced the total pulmonary vein stenosis score (5.6 ± 2.10 before repair, 2.6 ± 2.72 after repair, P = .0057). The preoperative pulmonary vein stenosis score was the only independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.732; P < .01). A preoperative pulmonary vein stenosis score of greater than 4 was a poor prognostic indicator (area under the curve, 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality and restenosis rates remained high despite the adoption of a sutureless technique. A preoperative pulmonary vein stenosis score of greater than 4 was a strong predictor of poor prognosis.

摘要

背景

原发性肺静脉狭窄常伴有进行性再狭窄和早期死亡。在过去的 20 年中,我们开发了一种无缝线修复技术来改善预后。

方法

回顾了 1989 年至 2008 年接受原发性肺静脉狭窄修复的患者的住院记录。采用肺静脉狭窄评分量化肺静脉狭窄。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析确定生存率。

结果

23 例患者接受了手术修复。诊断和指数修复时的平均年龄分别为 23.3 ± 45.6 岁和 24.1 ± 40.9 岁。18 例患者中有 13 例(72%)存在系统性或超系统性肺动脉压。7 例(31%)有单心室循环。23 例中有 19 例(83%)采用了无缝线技术。23 例中有 4 例(17%)采用了其他类型的修复。有 11 例记录的死亡(47%)。1、5 和 10 年的生存率分别为 64%、47%和 31%。5 例(22%)需要 1 次再次干预。手术修复显著降低了总肺静脉狭窄评分(修复前为 5.6 ± 2.10,修复后为 2.6 ± 2.72,P =.0057)。术前肺静脉狭窄评分是死亡的唯一独立预测因素(危险比,1.732;P <.01)。术前肺静脉狭窄评分大于 4 是预后不良的指标(曲线下面积,0.83)。

结论

尽管采用了无缝线技术,但死亡率和再狭窄率仍然很高。术前肺静脉狭窄评分大于 4 是预后不良的强烈预测指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验