• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 1 期和 2 期高血压患者中,血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与奥美沙坦和缬沙坦对动态血压和诊室血压的影响。

Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.

机构信息

Division of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Calhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030-3940, USA.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402
PMID:21282560
Abstract

Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class.

摘要

奥美沙坦酯是一种正在开发用于治疗高血压的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)。为了将该 ARB 与该类别的其他药物进行比较,我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,使用动态血压(BP)监测和诊室 BP 测量,研究了奥美沙坦酯 2 种剂量(80mg 和 40mg)、缬沙坦 320mg 和奥美沙坦酯(奥美沙坦)40mg 的疗效。主要疗效终点是 24 小时平均收缩压自基线的变化。首先进行优于安慰剂的优效性检验,然后进行非劣效性分析,接着检验奥美沙坦酯(80mg 和 40mg)与比较 ARB 的优效性。对于 1291 名随机患者,平均年龄为 56 岁,54%为男性,基线 24 小时平均收缩压为 145mmHg。奥美沙坦酯 80mg 的疗效优于缬沙坦 320mg 和奥美沙坦 40mg:与安慰剂相比,24 小时收缩压降低(-14.3mmHg)多于缬沙坦 320mg(-10.0mmHg;P<0.001)和奥美沙坦 40mg(-11.7mmHg;P=0.009)。奥美沙坦酯 40mg 与奥美沙坦 40mg 相比非劣效(差异:-1.4mmHg[95%CI:-3.3 至 0.5])。诊室收缩压方面,奥美沙坦酯的两种剂量均优于比较药物。安慰剂和 4 种活性治疗药物的安全性和耐受性相似。这些数据表明,奥美沙坦酯最大剂量的疗效优于最大剂量批准的奥美沙坦和缬沙坦,而不会增加不良反应。奥美沙坦酯在 ARB 类别中可能提供更高的高血压控制率。

相似文献

1
Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.在 1 期和 2 期高血压患者中,血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与奥美沙坦和缬沙坦对动态血压和诊室血压的影响。
Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
2
Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.使用24小时动态血压监测评估降压疗效:奥美沙坦酯、氯沙坦钾、缬沙坦和厄贝沙坦的比较
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(1):41-50. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505010-00006.
3
Azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure more effectively than olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 systolic hypertension.奥美沙坦酯氨氯地平复方制剂降压疗效优于奥美沙坦酯氢氯噻嗪复方制剂治疗 2 级收缩期高血压。
Hypertension. 2012 Aug;60(2):310-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.188284. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
4
Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.采用动态血压监测比较新型血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂阿齐沙坦酯与缬沙坦。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Jul;13(7):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00482.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
5
Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil.氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮联合奥美沙坦酯的降压疗效。
Am J Med. 2012 Dec;125(12):1229.e1-1229.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
6
Azilsartan medoxomil: a review of its use in hypertension.奥美沙坦酯:在高血压治疗中的应用评价。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Sep 1;32(9):621-39. doi: 10.2165/11209600-000000000-00000.
7
Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension.奥美沙坦酯:一种用于治疗高血压的新型血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Dec;45(12):1506-15. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q468. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
8
Effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared with olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes.与奥美沙坦和缬沙坦相比,阿齐沙坦酯对2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者动态血压和诊室血压的影响。
J Hypertens. 2016 Apr;34(4):788-97. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000839.
9
Antihypertensive, insulin-sensitising and renoprotective effects of a novel, potent and long-acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil, in rat and dog models.新型强效及长效血管紧张素 II 型 1 型受体阻滞剂阿齐沙坦酯在大鼠和犬模型中的降压、胰岛素增敏和肾脏保护作用。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2011 Nov 1;669(1-3):84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
10
The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure.阿齐沙坦酯和美托洛尔对动态和诊室血压的比较影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Feb;13(2):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of Songling Xuemaikang capsule on vascular remodeling of stage 1 hypertension: a multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled trial protocol.松龄血脉康胶囊对1级高血压血管重塑的影响:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验方案
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-05038-y.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Amlodipine in Japanese Patients With Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Noninferiority Study (PARASOL Study).沙库巴曲缬沙坦与氨氯地平治疗日本原发性高血压患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、多中心、开放标签、非劣效性研究(PARASOL研究)。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Jan;27(1):e14938. doi: 10.1111/jch.14938. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
3
A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of Azilsartan Medoxomil Compared to Other Anti-hypertensives Efficacy in Lowering Blood Pressure Amongst Mild to Moderate Hypertensive Patients.
一项关于阿齐沙坦酯与其他抗高血压药物在降低轻中度高血压患者血压方面疗效的系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Dec;41(12):4498-4517. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02997-5. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil in the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿齐沙坦酯治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 4;11:1383217. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1383217. eCollection 2024.
5
Effect of Azilsartan on clinical blood pressure reduction compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与其他血管紧张素受体阻滞剂相比,阿齐沙坦降低临床血压的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 8;86(2):958-967. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001547. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Azilsartan Attenuates 3-Nitropropinoic Acid-Induced Neurotoxicity in Rats: The Role of IĸB/NF-ĸB and KEAP1/Nrf2 Signaling Pathways.阿齐沙坦减轻大鼠 3-硝基丙酸诱导的神经毒性:IĸB/NF-ĸB 和 KEAP1/Nrf2 信号通路的作用。
Neurochem Res. 2024 Apr;49(4):1017-1033. doi: 10.1007/s11064-023-04083-8. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
7
Azilsartan inhibits inflammation-triggered bone resorption and osteoclastogenesis via suppression of TNF-α expression in macrophages.阿齐沙坦通过抑制巨噬细胞中 TNF-α 的表达抑制炎症触发的骨吸收和破骨细胞生成。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 15;14:1207502. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1207502. eCollection 2023.
8
Exploring the Effectiveness and Safety of Azilsartan-Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone Versus Olmesartan-Medoxomil/Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients: A Meta-Analysis.探索阿齐沙坦美多芭酯/氯噻酮与奥美沙坦美多芭酯/氢氯噻嗪在高血压患者中的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 30;15(6):e41198. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41198. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan and Amlodipine Combination Versus Telmisartan and Amlodipine Combination in Hypertensive Patients: A Non-inferiority Trial.阿齐沙坦与氨氯地平联合用药与替米沙坦与氨氯地平联合用药治疗高血压患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项非劣效性试验
Cureus. 2023 Mar 7;15(3):e35865. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35865. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
Long-term mortality and cardiovascular events of seven angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: Analysis of a national real-world database: A retrospective cohort study.七种植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗高血压患者的长期死亡率和心血管事件:一项基于全国真实世界数据库的分析:一项回顾性队列研究。 (注:原文中“angiotensin receptor blockers”表述有误,应该是“implantable cardioverter defibrillators”,译文已按照正确内容翻译)
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 31;6(2):e1056. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1056. eCollection 2023 Feb.