Division of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Calhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030-3940, USA.
Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class.
奥美沙坦酯是一种正在开发用于治疗高血压的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)。为了将该 ARB 与该类别的其他药物进行比较,我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,使用动态血压(BP)监测和诊室 BP 测量,研究了奥美沙坦酯 2 种剂量(80mg 和 40mg)、缬沙坦 320mg 和奥美沙坦酯(奥美沙坦)40mg 的疗效。主要疗效终点是 24 小时平均收缩压自基线的变化。首先进行优于安慰剂的优效性检验,然后进行非劣效性分析,接着检验奥美沙坦酯(80mg 和 40mg)与比较 ARB 的优效性。对于 1291 名随机患者,平均年龄为 56 岁,54%为男性,基线 24 小时平均收缩压为 145mmHg。奥美沙坦酯 80mg 的疗效优于缬沙坦 320mg 和奥美沙坦 40mg:与安慰剂相比,24 小时收缩压降低(-14.3mmHg)多于缬沙坦 320mg(-10.0mmHg;P<0.001)和奥美沙坦 40mg(-11.7mmHg;P=0.009)。奥美沙坦酯 40mg 与奥美沙坦 40mg 相比非劣效(差异:-1.4mmHg[95%CI:-3.3 至 0.5])。诊室收缩压方面,奥美沙坦酯的两种剂量均优于比较药物。安慰剂和 4 种活性治疗药物的安全性和耐受性相似。这些数据表明,奥美沙坦酯最大剂量的疗效优于最大剂量批准的奥美沙坦和缬沙坦,而不会增加不良反应。奥美沙坦酯在 ARB 类别中可能提供更高的高血压控制率。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011-6-20
Clin Drug Investig. 2012-9-1
Ann Pharmacother. 2011-11-24
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011-2
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024-7-4