Unidade dos Retrovírus e Infecções Associadas, Centro de Patogénese Molecular, Faculdade de Farmácia de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 20;6(1):e14548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014548.
Unlike in HIV-1 infection, the majority of HIV-2 patients produce broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies, control viral replication and survive as elite controllers. The identification of the molecular, structural and evolutionary footprints underlying these very distinct immunological and clinical outcomes may lead to the development of new strategies for the prevention and treatment of HIV infection.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We performed a side-by-side molecular, evolutionary and structural comparison of the C2, V3 and C3 envelope regions from HIV-1 and HIV-2. These regions contain major antigenic targets and are important for receptor binding. In HIV-2, these regions also have immune modulatory properties. We found that these regions are significantly more variable in HIV-1 than in HIV-2. Within each virus, C3 is the most entropic region followed by either C2 (HIV-2) or V3 (HIV-1). The C3 region is well exposed in the HIV-2 envelope and is under strong diversifying selection suggesting that, like in HIV-1, it may harbour neutralizing epitopes. Notably, however, extreme diversification of C2 and C3 seems to be deleterious for HIV-2 and prevent its transmission. Computer modelling simulations showed that in HIV-2 the V3 loop is much less exposed than C2 and C3 and has a retractile conformation due to a physical interaction with both C2 and C3. The concealed and conserved nature of V3 in the HIV-2 is consistent with its lack of immunodominancy in vivo and with its role in preventing immune activation. In contrast, HIV-1 had an extended and accessible V3 loop that is consistent with its immunodominant and neutralizing nature.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We identify significant structural and functional constrains to the diversification and evolution of C2, V3 and C3 in the HIV-2 envelope but not in HIV-1. These studies highlight fundamental differences in the biology and infection of HIV-1 and HIV-2 and in their mode of interaction with the human immune system and may inform new vaccine and therapeutic interventions against these viruses.
与 HIV-1 感染不同,大多数 HIV-2 患者会产生广泛反应性的中和抗体,控制病毒复制并作为精英控制器存活。确定导致这些截然不同的免疫和临床结果的分子、结构和进化特征,可能会为预防和治疗 HIV 感染带来新的策略。
方法/主要发现:我们对 HIV-1 和 HIV-2 的包膜 C2、V3 和 C3 区进行了分子、进化和结构的并列比较。这些区域包含主要的抗原靶标,对于受体结合很重要。在 HIV-2 中,这些区域也具有免疫调节特性。我们发现,这些区域在 HIV-1 中的变异性明显高于 HIV-2。在每种病毒中,C3 是最混乱的区域,其次是 C2(HIV-2)或 V3(HIV-1)。C3 区域在 HIV-2 包膜中暴露良好,受到强烈的多样化选择,表明它可能像 HIV-1 一样含有中和表位。值得注意的是,C2 和 C3 的极端多样化似乎对 HIV-2 有害,并阻止了其传播。计算机建模模拟表明,在 HIV-2 中,V3 环的暴露程度远低于 C2 和 C3,并且由于与 C2 和 C3 的物理相互作用,其呈现回缩构象。HIV-2 中 V3 的隐蔽和保守性质与其体内缺乏免疫显性以及其在防止免疫激活中的作用一致。相比之下,HIV-1 具有延伸和可及的 V3 环,这与其免疫显性和中和性质一致。
结论/意义:我们确定了 HIV-2 包膜中 C2、V3 和 C3 多样化和进化的显著结构和功能限制,但在 HIV-1 中没有。这些研究突出了 HIV-1 和 HIV-2 的生物学和感染以及它们与人类免疫系统相互作用方式的根本差异,并可能为针对这些病毒的新疫苗和治疗干预措施提供信息。