• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义无症状个体髋臼倾斜度和髋关节中心边缘角的参考范围。

Defining a reference range of acetabular inclination and center-edge angle of the hip in asymptomatic individuals.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Nov;40(11):1427-34. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1109-3. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00256-011-1109-3
PMID:21286713
Abstract

PURPOSE

Acetabular morphology is an important predictor of the severity of osteoarthrosis and survival of hip prostheses but there is limited data on the normal range of acetabular measurements on plain radiographs. The aim of this project was to determine the statistically normal ranges of acetabular inclination (AI) and center-edge angle (CEA).

METHOD

One hundred coronal CT localizers (50 men and 50 women aged 20-30 years) were included in this study. All the patients underwent CT examination for thoracic or intra-abdominal indications. Patients with pelvic disease, fractures, history of serious trauma, or previous pelvic surgery were excluded. One pair of independent observers measured the AI and pelvic tilt (PT), and a further pair measured the center-edge angle (CEA), using electronic calipers on a high-resolution PACS workstation.

RESULTS

AI and CEA measurements were obtained for 200 hips. There was very good intra-class correlation between the observers (r = 0.7-0.8). The mean AI was 38.8° (2SD 32.1-45.5°). That in men was 38.0° (2 SD 31.8-44.1°) and 39.6° (2 SD 32.7-46.8°) in women, which was statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). The mean CEA measurement for all patients was 36.3° (SD 13.8°), for men 37.7° (SD 10.8°) and for women 34.9° (SD 11.4°) with a statistically significant gender difference (p < 0.001). The mean pelvic tilt measurement (sacro-coccygeal-pubic symphysis) was 38.3 mm (2 SD 18.3-58.3 mm) with a significant gender difference (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study define reference ranges of two common measures of acetabular morphology and confirm statistically significant differences between men and women.

摘要

目的

髋臼形态是评估骨关节炎严重程度和髋关节假体生存率的重要指标,但关于骨盆平片上髋臼测量的正常范围数据有限。本项目旨在确定髋臼倾斜角(AI)和中心边缘角(CEA)的统计学正常范围。

方法

本研究纳入了 100 例冠状 CT 定位器(50 名男性和 50 名女性,年龄 20-30 岁)。所有患者均因胸部或腹部疾病行 CT 检查。排除患有骨盆疾病、骨折、严重创伤史或既往骨盆手术的患者。一对独立的观察者使用电子卡尺在高分辨率 PACS 工作站上测量 AI 和骨盆倾斜角(PT),另一对观察者测量中心边缘角(CEA)。

结果

共获得 200 髋的 AI 和 CEA 测量值。观察者之间的组内相关系数非常好(r=0.7-0.8)。AI 的平均值为 38.8°(2SD 32.1-45.5°)。男性为 38.0°(2 SD 31.8-44.1°),女性为 39.6°(2 SD 32.7-46.8°),统计学上有显著差异(p<0.001)。所有患者的平均 CEA 测量值为 36.3°(SD 13.8°),男性为 37.7°(SD 10.8°),女性为 34.9°(SD 11.4°),性别差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。骶尾骨耻骨联合的平均骨盆倾斜测量值为 38.3mm(2 SD 18.3-58.3mm),性别差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。

结论

本研究结果定义了两种常见髋臼形态测量方法的参考范围,并证实了男性和女性之间存在统计学显著差异。

相似文献

1
Defining a reference range of acetabular inclination and center-edge angle of the hip in asymptomatic individuals.定义无症状个体髋臼倾斜度和髋关节中心边缘角的参考范围。
Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Nov;40(11):1427-34. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1109-3. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
2
Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage.正常髋关节是否被误诊为病理性髋关节?一种基于CT的正常髋臼覆盖范围的定义方法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1247-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4055-2.
3
Do Radiographic Parameters of Dysplasia Improve to Normal Ranges After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后发育不良的影像学参数会改善至正常范围吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1120-1127. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5077-8.
4
Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography.使用三维计算机断层扫描技术研究正常髋关节中股骨近端和髋臼的对准关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):367-75. doi: 10.1177/0363546511424390. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
5
Definition of a quantitative measurement method for acetabular version in a plain radiograph in the healthy adult hip.健康成人髋关节平片上髋臼前倾角定量测量方法的定义。
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2015;26(1):2-5. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2015.02.
6
Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: Analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility.低剂量EOS成像系统对102名无症状受试者站立位时髋臼三维标准方位的测量:按侧别、性别、骨盆入射角及可重复性分析
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
7
Sex differences in reference values of hip acetabular measurements using computed tomography in Japanese adults and the effect of aging on the measurement parameters.日本成年人髋关节髋臼测量的 CT 参考值的性别差异及测量参数随年龄变化的影响。
J Orthop Sci. 2021 Nov;26(6):1029-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
8
Three Patterns of Acetabular Deficiency Are Common in Young Adult Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia.在患有髋臼发育不良的年轻成年患者中,髋臼缺损的三种模式很常见。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5150-3.
9
Does Acetabular Coverage Vary Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Patients with Hip Dysplasia?髋臼覆盖在髋关节发育不良患者的仰卧位和站立位之间是否不同?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2455-2466. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000898.
10
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?髋臼覆盖不足和覆盖过度的影像学参考值是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1234-46. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4038-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term prediction of clinical and radiographic contralateral hip osteoarthritis after index total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术后对侧髋关节临床及影像学骨关节炎的短期预测
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 12;145(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05615-9.
2
Finite Element Analysis of Normal and Dysplastic Hip Joints in Children.儿童正常和发育异常髋关节的有限元分析
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 10;13(11):1593. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111593.
3
What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining normal vertebral angulation at the thoracolumbar junction.定义胸腰段交界处的正常椎体角度。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):W33-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2026.
2
In vitro investigation of the influence of pelvic tilt on acetabular cup alignment.骨盆倾斜对髋臼杯对线影响的体外研究
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.014. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
3
Unilateral hip osteoarthritis: can we predict the outcome of the other hip?单侧髋关节骨关节炎:我们能否预测另一侧髋关节的预后?
中心边缘角和α角的参考值及其相关因素是什么?一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Nov;476(11):2249-2259. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000410.
4
Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.髋关节形态对称,与肢体优势和性别无关:对股骨髋臼撞击症的影响。一项在无症状受试者中的 3D CT 分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1609-1624. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5072-9. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
5
Does hemipelvis structure and position influence acetabulum orientation?半骨盆的结构和位置会影响髋臼方向吗?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar 16;17:131. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0982-2.
6
Radiographic measurements of hip dysplasia at skeletal maturity--new reference intervals based on 2,038 19-year-old Norwegians.髋关节发育不良的影像学测量--基于 2038 名 19 岁挪威人的新参考区间。
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jul;42(7):925-35. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1574-y. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
7
Does femoral rotation influence anteroposterior alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, and medial proximal femoral angle? A pilot study.股骨旋转是否会影响前-后 alpha 角、外侧中心边缘角和内侧股骨近端角?一项初步研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 May;471(5):1639-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2708-6. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
8
Can radiographic morphometric parameters for the hip be assessed on MRI?髋关节的放射影像学形态计量参数能否在 MRI 上评估?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):989-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2654-3. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
9
Lateral center-edge angle on conventional radiography and computed tomography.常规 X 线片和 CT 上的外侧中心边缘角。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2233-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2651-6. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
10
Normal values of Wiberg's lateral center-edge angle and Lequesne's acetabular index--a coxometric update.Wiberg 外侧中心边缘角和 Lequesne 髋臼指数的正常值——一项 Coxometric 更新。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Sep;41(10):1273-8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1420-7. Epub 2012 May 15.
Skeletal Radiol. 2008 Oct;37(10):911-6. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0522-8. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
4
A new tilt on pelvic radiographs: a pilot study.骨盆X线片的一种新倾斜角度:一项初步研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Feb;38(2):113-22. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0481-0. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
5
Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.髋臼覆盖不足与过度时,股骨形态会有所不同。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Apr;466(4):782-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0141-7. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
6
Radiographic method to measure the inclination angle of the acetabulum.测量髋臼倾斜角的影像学方法。
J Orthop Sci. 2008 Jan;13(1):62-71. doi: 10.1007/s00776-007-1188-0. Epub 2008 Feb 16.
7
The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept.髋关节骨关节炎的病因:一种综合力学概念。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Feb;466(2):264-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
8
Assessment of cup position from plain radiographs: impact of pelvic tilting.通过平片评估髋臼位置:骨盆倾斜的影响
Surg Radiol Anat. 2007 Feb;29(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s00276-006-0167-z. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
9
Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays--a comparison of six parameters.前后位X线片上骨盆倾斜度的评估——六种参数的比较
Skeletal Radiol. 2006 Mar;35(3):149-55. doi: 10.1007/s00256-005-0050-8. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
10
[Femoroacetabular impingement: trigger for the development of coxarthrosis].[股骨髋臼撞击症:髋关节骨关节炎发展的触发因素]
Orthopade. 2006 Jan;35(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0896-4.