• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院不复苏令:它们为何失败以及如何改进。

Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them.

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, 525 E 68th Street, Box 39, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):791-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1632-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-011-1632-x
PMID:21286839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138592/
Abstract

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders have been in use in hospitals nationwide for over 20 years. Nonetheless, as currently implemented, they fail to adequately fulfill their two intended purposes--to support patient autonomy and to prevent non-beneficial interventions. These failures lead to serious consequences. Patients are deprived of the opportunity to make informed decisions regarding resuscitation, and CPR is performed on patients who would have wanted it withheld or are harmed by the procedure. This article highlights the persistent problems with today's use of inpatient DNR orders, i.e., DNR discussions do not occur frequently enough and occur too late in the course of patients' illnesses to allow their participation in resuscitation decisions. Furthermore, many physicians fail to provide adequate information to allow patients or surrogates to make informed decisions and inappropriately extrapolate DNR orders to limit other treatments. Because these failings are primarily due to systemic factors that result in deficient physician behaviors, we propose strategies to target these factors including changing the hospital culture, reforming hospital policies on DNR discussions, mandating provider communication skills training, and using financial incentives. These strategies could help overcome existing barriers to proper DNR discussions and align the use of DNR orders closer to their intended purposes of supporting patient self-determination and avoiding non-beneficial interventions at the end of life.

摘要

“不复苏”(Do-not-resuscitate,DNR)医嘱在全国的医院中已经使用了 20 多年。然而,就目前的实施情况来看,它们未能充分实现其两个预期目的——支持患者自主权和防止无益的干预。这些失败导致了严重的后果。患者被剥夺了就复苏做出明智决策的机会,而 CPR 则在那些希望停止或因该程序而受到伤害的患者身上进行。本文强调了当今使用住院患者 DNR 医嘱时存在的持续问题,即 DNR 讨论不够频繁,而且在患者疾病过程中发生得太晚,无法让他们参与复苏决策。此外,许多医生未能提供足够的信息,以使患者或代理人能够做出明智的决策,并不适当地将 DNR 医嘱推断为限制其他治疗。由于这些失败主要是由于系统因素导致医生行为不足,我们提出了针对这些因素的策略,包括改变医院文化、改革医院关于 DNR 讨论的政策、强制进行医疗服务提供者沟通技巧培训,以及使用经济激励措施。这些策略可以帮助克服适当的 DNR 讨论中存在的现有障碍,并使 DNR 医嘱的使用更符合其支持患者自主决策和避免生命末期无益干预的预期目的。

相似文献

1
Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them.医院不复苏令:它们为何失败以及如何改进。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):791-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1632-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
2
Influence of institutional culture and policies on do-not-resuscitate decision making at the end of life.机构文化和政策对生命末期不复苏决策的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):812-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0295.
3
Nurses' Experiences and Factors Related to Their Attitudes Regarding Discussions with Patients and Family Members about Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions and Life-Sustaining Treatment Withdrawal: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.护士对与患者和家属讨论不复苏决策和生命支持治疗撤回的态度的经验和相关因素:一项基于医院的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;17(2):0. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020557.
4
End of life decisions: attitudes of Finnish physicians.临终决策:芬兰医生的态度
J Med Ethics. 2004 Aug;30(4):362-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.001081.
5
Physicians attitudes toward DNR of terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan.台湾地区医生对晚期癌症患者“不要复苏”医嘱的态度。
J Nurs Res. 2002 Sep;10(3):161-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000347595.66638.1e.
6
[Do-not-resuscitate orders--ethical and legal considerations].[不要复苏医嘱——伦理和法律考量]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Mar 26;169(13):1201-4.
7
The perceptions of do-not-resuscitate policies of dying patients with cancer.癌症晚期患者对放弃心肺复苏政策的看法。
Psychooncology. 2008 Apr;17(4):347-53. doi: 10.1002/pon.1246.
8
Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit.美国重症监护病房临终决策的趋势。
Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(6):316-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01694704.
9
Managing do-not-resuscitate orders in the perianesthesia period.围麻醉期不进行心肺复苏医嘱的管理
J Perianesth Nurs. 2004 Oct;19(5):300-7.
10
Do-not-resuscitate orders among advanced-stage Chinese lung cancer patients who died in hospital.在中国晚期肺癌住院死亡患者中实施的“不要复苏”医嘱。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Apr;24(4):1763-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2966-4. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Perspective of the General Population in Saudi Arabia towards Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Orders: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯普通民众对“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱的看法:一项横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;11(14):2073. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142073.
2
"To Be or Not to Be"-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Hospitalized People Who Have a Low Probability of Benefit: Qualitative Analysis of Semi-structured Interviews.“生存还是毁灭”——对受益可能性低的住院患者实施心肺复苏:半结构化访谈的定性分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Apr 26;8(1):23814683231168589. doi: 10.1177/23814683231168589. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
3
Obstacles to patient inclusion in CPR/DNAR decisions and challenging conversations: A qualitative study with internal medicine physicians in Southern Switzerland.患者纳入 CPR/DNAR 决策和挑战性对话的障碍:瑞士南部内科医生的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0282270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282270. eCollection 2023.
4
Early Versus Late DNR Orders and its Predictors in a Saudi Arabian ICU: A Descriptive Study.沙特阿拉伯重症监护病房中早期与晚期不进行心肺复苏医嘱及其预测因素:一项描述性研究
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2022 Sep-Dec;10(3):192-197. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_141_22. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
5
Palliative Care, Patient-Reported Measures, and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cirrhosis.终末期肝病患者住院期间的姑息治疗、患者报告的测量指标和结局。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):953-961. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
6
Investigating Key Factors Related to the Decision of a Do-Not-Resuscitate Consent.探究与不进行心肺复苏同意书决策相关的关键因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;19(1):428. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010428.
7
A descriptive analysis of obstacles to fulfilling the end of life care goals among cardiac arrest patients.心脏骤停患者实现临终关怀目标的障碍的描述性分析。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Aug 27;8:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100160. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study.实施重症护理计划后临床医生的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517.
9
Low adherence to legislation regarding Do-Not-Attempt-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation orders in a Swedish University Hospital.瑞典一家大学医院对“不要尝试心肺复苏”医嘱相关立法的依从性较低。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 29;6:100128. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100128. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
DNR and COVID-19: The Ethical Dilemma and Suggested Solutions.“不要复苏”指令与2019冠状病毒病:伦理困境及建议解决方案
Front Public Health. 2021 May 12;9:560405. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.560405. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of critically ill patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation.接受心肺复苏的危重症患者的结局。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug 15;182(4):501-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1639OC. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
2
Garnering support for advance care planning.为预先护理计划争取支持。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):269-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1956.
3
The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: a statewide evaluation.基于绩效的财务激励对改善患者护理体验的效果:全州评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Dec;24(12):1281-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1122-6. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
4
Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly.老年人院内心肺复苏的流行病学研究
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 2;361(1):22-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810245.
5
A comprehensive hand hygiene approach to reducing MRSA health care-associated infections.一种减少耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)医疗保健相关感染的全面手部卫生方法。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Apr;35(4):180-5. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35024-2.
6
An interactive educational workshop to improve end of life communication skills.一个旨在提高临终沟通技巧的互动式教育工作坊。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Fall;28(4):241-8; quiz 249-55. doi: 10.1002/chp.191.
7
Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients.关于维持生命治疗的沟通与决策:审视住院医师和重症患者的经历
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov;23(11):1877-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0779-6. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
8
Improving reassessment and documentation of pain management.改善疼痛管理的重新评估与记录。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Sep;34(9):509-17. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34065-3.
9
The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act.“不要复苏”医嘱:与预先指示、医生专业以及《患者自主决定法案》实施15年后讨论记录的关联
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):642-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022517.
10
Nationwide veterans affairs quality measure for cancer: the family assessment of treatment at end of life.全国退伍军人事务部癌症质量指标:临终治疗的家庭评估
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 10;26(23):3838-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.8534.