University of California, 92664, Irvine, California.
Mem Cognit. 1976 Sep;4(5):471-5. doi: 10.3758/BF03213206.
List items were given as retrieval cues in a free-recall experiment which factorially combined the presence or absence of cues with the amount of time allowed for use of each cue (10 sec or 30 sec). A categorizable list of 75 randomly presented words was learned, and 48 h later a free-recall test trial was given, followed by a final memory search task. During the final task, cued subjects received words from categories that had not been recalled during the free-recall test. With both time intervals, cued subjects recalled more words than noncued subjects, indicating that random presentation of categorized words does not necessarily preclude the observation of a cueing effect with list items, as has been reported previously. The composition of recall, whether from previously recalled or nonrecalled categories, varied as a function of time for both groups. The results were interpreteod in terms of retrieval strategies employed by cued and noncued subjects and the effect of time on these strategies.
在一项自由回忆实验中,项目以列表形式呈现,作为检索线索,该实验综合考虑了线索的有无以及每个线索(10 秒或 30 秒)的可用时间。学习了一个由 75 个随机呈现的单词组成的可分类列表,48 小时后进行自由回忆测试,然后进行最终的记忆搜索任务。在最终任务中,有提示的被试从自由回忆测试中未回忆出的类别中接收单词。在这两个时间间隔内,有提示的被试比没有提示的被试回忆出更多的单词,这表明之前曾有报道称,随机呈现分类单词不一定会排除对列表项目的提示效应的观察。对于这两个组,无论是从先前回忆出的还是未回忆出的类别中进行回忆,其组成都随着时间的推移而变化。结果根据有提示和无提示的被试使用的检索策略以及时间对这些策略的影响进行了解释。