• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英语中的隐性因果关系偏差:300 个动词的语料库。

Implicit causality bias in English: a corpus of 300 verbs.

机构信息

University of Sussex, School of Psychology, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):124-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0023-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-010-0023-2
PMID:21287124
Abstract

This study provides implicit verb causality norms for a corpus of 305 English verbs. A web-based sentence completion study was conducted, with 96 respondents completing fragments such as "John liked Mary because..." The resulting bias scores are provided as supplementary material in the Psychonomic Society Archive, where we also present lexical and semantic verb features, such as the frequency, semantic class and emotional valence. Our results replicate those of previous studies with much smaller numbers of verbs and respondents. Novel effects of gender and its interaction with verb valence illustrate the type of issues that can be investigated using stable norms for a large number of verbs. The corpus will facilitate future studies in a range of areas, including psycholinguistics and social psychology.

摘要

本研究为 305 个英语动词提供了隐性动词因果关系规范。我们进行了一项基于网络的句子完成研究,96 名受访者完成了类似“约翰喜欢玛丽是因为……”的片段。由此产生的偏差分数作为补充材料在心理科学协会档案中提供,我们还提供了词汇和语义动词特征,如频率、语义类别和情感效价。我们的结果复制了之前使用数量较少的动词和受访者进行的研究。性别及其与动词效价的相互作用的新效应说明了可以使用大量动词的稳定规范来研究的问题类型。该语料库将促进未来在心理语言学和社会心理学等一系列领域的研究。

相似文献

1
Implicit causality bias in English: a corpus of 300 verbs.英语中的隐性因果关系偏差:300 个动词的语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):124-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0023-2.
2
Implicit consequentiality bias in English: A corpus of 300+ verbs.英语中的隐性因果偏向:300 多个动词的语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1530-1550. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01507-z. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
Verbs in space: axis and direction of motion norms for 299 English verbs.空间中的动词:299个英语动词的运动轴和方向规范
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):565-74. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.565.
4
French categorization norms for 70 semantic categories and comparison with Van Overschelde et al.'s (2004) English norms.法语 70 个语义类别分类规范及与 Van Overschelde 等人(2004 年)英语规范的比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1018-28. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1018.
5
Descriptive norms for 245 Italian idiomatic expressions.245 个意大利惯用表达的描述性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):110-23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0018-z.
6
[Implicit causality in language: criteria for selection of stimulus material in studies of verb causality].[语言中的隐含因果关系:动词因果关系研究中刺激材料的选择标准]
Z Exp Psychol. 1997;44(2):293-304.
7
The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.句子理解中句法结构的语义加工:一项事件相关电位研究
Brain Res. 2007 Apr 20;1142:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.030. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
8
The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors.动词语义类别和动词频率(固化程度)对儿童和成人关于论元结构过度泛化错误的分级判断的影响。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):87-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.015. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
9
How long does it take to find a cause? An online investigation of implicit causality in sentence production.找到原因需要多长时间?句子生成中隐性因果关系的在线调查。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Sep;59(9):1535-55. doi: 10.1080/17470210500269105.
10
Mental representation of verb meaning: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.动词意义的心理表征:行为学和电生理学证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1774-87. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1774.

引用本文的文献

1
Interference of Implicit Causality in Relative Clause Processing.关系从句加工中隐性因果关系的干扰
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Mar 3;9:364-400. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00193. eCollection 2025.
2
A cognitive modeling approach to learning and using reference biases in language.一种用于学习和运用语言中参照偏差的认知建模方法。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Nov 16;5:933504. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.933504. eCollection 2022.
3
Implicit Causality and Pronoun Resolution in Intersubjective Discourse Relations.主体间话语关系中的隐性因果关系与代词指代消解
Front Psychol. 2022 May 10;13:866103. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866103. eCollection 2022.
4
Pronoun Production and Comprehension in American Sign Language: The Interaction of Space, Grammar, and Semantics.美国手语中的代词生成与理解:空间、语法和语义的相互作用
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(1):80-102. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1968013. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
Priming the self as an agent influences causal, spatial, and temporal events: implications for animacy, cultural differences, and clinical settings.自我启动为主体会影响因果、空间和时间事件:对能动性、文化差异和临床环境的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01521-6. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
6
Implicit causality biases and thematic roles in American Sign Language.美国手语中的隐含因果偏见和主题角色。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2172-2190. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01561-1. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Implicit consequentiality bias in English: A corpus of 300+ verbs.英语中的隐性因果偏向:300 多个动词的语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1530-1550. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01507-z. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
8
Prediction at the Discourse Level in Spanish-English Bilinguals: An Eye-Tracking Study.西班牙语-英语双语者语篇层面的预测:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00956. eCollection 2019.
9
Implicit causality bias in adults with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤成人的内隐因果偏差
J Commun Disord. 2018 Jan-Feb;71:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
10
Agents and Patients in Physical Settings: Linguistic Cues Affect the Assignment of Causality in German and Tongan.物理环境中的施事和受事:语言线索对德语和汤加语中因果关系归属的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 7;8:1093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01093. eCollection 2017.