• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于血糖控制的警示性临床决策支持系统对强化心脏监护病房的方案依从性和血糖控制的影响。

Impact of an alerting clinical decision support system for glucose control on protocol compliance and glycemic control in the intensive cardiac care unit.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar;13(3):343-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0100. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2010.0100
PMID:21291336
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glycemic control in patients with acute cardiac conditions is a clinical challenge but may substantially improve patient outcome. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of implementing an automated version of an existing insulin protocol for glucose regulation in the Intensive Cardiac Care Unit (ICCU) on compliance with the protocol and achievement of glycemic targets.

METHODS

During an 11-month period, data of 667 patients with two or more glucose measurements were evaluated, 425 before and 242 after implementation of the clinical decision support system (CDSS) for glucose control at the Erasmus Medical Center ICCU (Rotterdam, The Netherlands).

RESULTS

After implementation, compliance with the advised measurement time increased from 40% to 52% (P < 0.001), and compliance regarding insulin dosage increased from 49% to 61% (P < 0.001). Also, more patients had a mean glucose level within the target range of 81-126 mg/dL (31% vs. 43% [P = 0.01]). Monthly evaluation identified reasons for protocol noncompliance (e.g., nutritional status and time of day) and will be used to improve the existing CDSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDSS implementation of an insulin protocol in an ICCU improved compliance, identified targets for further improvement of the protocol, and resulted in improved glucose regulation after implementation.

摘要

背景

急性心脏疾病患者的血糖控制是一个临床挑战,但可以显著改善患者的预后。本研究的目的是评估在重症心脏监护病房(ICCU)实施现有胰岛素血糖调节协议的自动化版本对遵守协议和实现血糖目标的影响。

方法

在 11 个月的时间内,评估了在荷兰鹿特丹伊拉斯谟医疗中心 ICCU 实施血糖控制临床决策支持系统(CDSS)前后 667 名患者的两次或多次血糖测量数据,其中 425 名患者在实施前,242 名患者在实施后。

结果

实施后,建议的测量时间的依从性从 40%增加到 52%(P < 0.001),胰岛素剂量的依从性从 49%增加到 61%(P < 0.001)。此外,更多患者的平均血糖水平在 81-126mg/dL 的目标范围内(31%对 43%[P=0.01])。每月评估确定了违反协议的原因(例如营养状况和时间),并将用于改进现有的 CDSS。

结论

ICCU 中胰岛素协议的 CDSS 实施提高了依从性,确定了进一步改进协议的目标,并在实施后改善了血糖调节。

相似文献

1
Impact of an alerting clinical decision support system for glucose control on protocol compliance and glycemic control in the intensive cardiac care unit.用于血糖控制的警示性临床决策支持系统对强化心脏监护病房的方案依从性和血糖控制的影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar;13(3):343-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0100. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
2
Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for glucose control: impact of protocol modifications on compliance and achievement of glycemic targets.用于血糖控制的临床决策支持系统的评估:方案修改对依从性和血糖目标达成情况的影响。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Sep;9(3):140-7. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181e7d7ca.
3
Evaluation of an intensive insulin protocol for septic patients in a medical intensive care unit.在医疗重症监护病房对脓毒症患者强化胰岛素方案的评估。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):2974-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000248906.10399.CF.
4
Effects of computerized decision support systems on blood glucose regulation in critically ill surgical patients.计算机决策支持系统对危重症外科患者血糖调节的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):828-33; discussion 833-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
5
Intensive insulin protocol implementation and outcomes in the medical and surgical wards at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.在退伍军人事务医疗中心的内科和外科病房实施强化胰岛素方案的结果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;44(2):249-56. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M501. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
6
Adherence to and efficacy and safety of an insulin protocol in the critically ill: a prospective observational study.重症患者胰岛素治疗方案的依从性、疗效及安全性:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2007 Nov;16(6):599-608.
7
Intraoperative blood glucose management: impact of a real-time decision support system on adherence to institutional protocol.术中血糖管理:实时决策支持系统对遵循机构协议的影响。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Jun;30(3):301-12. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9718-3. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
8
Improving glycemic control in medical inpatients: a pilot study.改善住院患者的血糖控制:一项试点研究。
J Hosp Med. 2008 Jan;3(1):55-63. doi: 10.1002/jhm.263.
9
A practical approach to hyperglycemia management in the intensive care unit: evaluation of an intensive insulin infusion protocol.重症监护病房高血糖管理的实用方法:强化胰岛素输注方案的评估
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Oct;26(10):1410-20. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.10.1410.
10
Glycemic control in cardiac surgery: implementing an evidence-based insulin infusion protocol.心脏手术中的血糖控制:实施基于证据的胰岛素输注方案。
Am J Crit Care. 2014 May;23(3):250-8. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2014236.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.探索人工智能在重症监护病房脓毒症管理中的潜力。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2025 Aug 28;2025:9031137. doi: 10.1155/ccrp/9031137. eCollection 2025.
2
Expanding access to veterinary clinical decision support in resource-limited settings: a scoping review of clinical decision support tools in medicine and antimicrobial stewardship.在资源有限的环境中扩大兽医临床决策支持的可及性:医学和抗菌药物管理中临床决策支持工具的范围综述
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jun 4;11:1349188. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1349188. eCollection 2024.
3
A randomized controlled trial for evaluating the impact of integrating a computerized clinical decision support system and a socially assistive humanoid robot into grand rounds during pre/post-operative care.
一项随机对照试验,用于评估在术前/术后护理期间将计算机化临床决策支持系统和社交辅助人形机器人整合到教学查房中的影响。
Digit Health. 2022 Sep 25;8:20552076221129068. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129068. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Clinical Decision Support for Glycemic Management Reduces Hospital Length of Stay.临床决策支持用于血糖管理可减少住院时间。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):2526-2534. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0829.
5
Hydroxyethyl starch for perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy in 2020: a narrative review.2020年羟乙基淀粉用于围手术期目标导向液体治疗:一项叙述性综述
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01128-1.
6
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.临床决策支持系统概述:益处、风险及成功策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. eCollection 2020.
7
Anesthesiology Control Tower-Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACTFAST): Mixed-Methods Study of a Novel Telemedicine-Based Support System for the Operating Room.麻醉学控制塔——支持转化的可行性评估(ACTFAST):一种基于远程医疗的新型手术室支持系统的混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Apr 23;6(2):e12155. doi: 10.2196/12155.
8
Novel displays of patient information in critical care settings: a systematic review.重症监护环境中患者信息的新展示:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 May 1;26(5):479-489. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy193.
9
Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)-a feasibility study protocol.麻醉学控制塔:支持转化的可行性评估(ACT-FAST)——一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jan 25;4:38. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0233-4. eCollection 2018.
10
Effects of computerized decision support system implementations on patient outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review.计算机化决策支持系统实施对住院患者治疗结局的影响:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):593-602. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx100.