Suppr超能文献

使用计算机程序计算血糖波动的平均幅度。

The use of a computer program to calculate the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions.

机构信息

Diabetes Service Center, Karlsburg, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar;13(3):319-25. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0108. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), traditionally estimated with a graphical approach, is often used to characterize glycemic variability. Here, we tested a proposed software program for calculating MAGE.

METHODS

Development and testing of the software was based on retrospective analyses of 72-h continuous glucose monitoring profile data collected during two different clinical studies involving 474 outpatients (458 with type 2 and 16 with type 1 diabetes) in three cohorts (two type 2 diabetes and one type 1 diabetes), using the CGMS® Gold™ (Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA). Correlation analyses and a Bland-Altman procedure were used to compare the results of MAGE calculations performed using the developed computer program (MAGE(C)) and the original method (MAGE(O)).

RESULTS

Close linear correlations between MAGE(C) and MAGE(O) were documented in the two type 2 and the type 1 diabetes cohorts (r = 0.954, 0.962, and 0.951, respectively; P < 0.00001 for all), as was the absence of any systematic error between the two calculation methods. Comparison of the two indices revealed no within-group differences but did show differences among the various antihyperglycemic treatments (P < 0.0001). In each of the study cohorts, MAGE(C) correlated strongly with the SD (r = 0.914-0.943), moderately with the mean of daily differences (r = 0.688-0.757), and weakly with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c and mean sensor glucose (r= 0.285 and r = 0.473, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed computerized calculation of MAGE is a practicable method that may provide an efficient tool for assessing glycemic variability.

摘要

背景

传统上,通过图形方法估计平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE),用于描述血糖变异性。在此,我们测试了一种用于计算 MAGE 的软件。

方法

基于两项涉及三个队列(两个 2 型糖尿病队列和一个 1 型糖尿病队列)的 474 例门诊患者(458 例 2 型糖尿病和 16 例 1 型糖尿病)的 72 小时连续血糖监测数据的回顾性分析,对软件进行了开发和测试,使用 CGMS® GoldTM(美敦力 MiniMed,北岭,CA)。采用相关分析和 Bland-Altman 法比较了使用开发的计算机程序(MAGE(C))和原始方法(MAGE(O))计算的 MAGE 结果。

结果

在两个 2 型糖尿病队列和 1 型糖尿病队列中,MAGE(C)与 MAGE(O)之间存在密切的线性相关性(r=0.954、0.962 和 0.951,均 P<0.00001),两种计算方法之间也不存在系统误差。两种指数的比较没有显示组内差异,但确实显示了各种抗高血糖治疗之间的差异(P<0.0001)。在每个研究队列中,MAGE(C)与 SD(r=0.914-0.943)高度相关,与平均每日差异(r=0.688-0.757)中度相关,与糖化血红蛋白 A1c 和平均传感器血糖(r=0.285 和 r=0.473)相关性较弱。

结论

提出的 MAGE 计算机化计算方法是一种可行的方法,可能为评估血糖变异性提供一种有效的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验