van Dillen Jeroen, Mesman Jeanette A J M, Zwart Joost J, Bloemenkamp Kitty W M, van Roosmalen Jos
UMC St Radboud, afd. Verloskunde en Gynaecologie, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A2541.
To describe the audit of severe acute maternal morbidity in the Netherlands, indicating the audit procedure and possible points for improvement.
Descriptive audit investigation.
Eight audit meetings were held concerning cases of severe acute maternal morbidity selected from a prospective, population-based, cohort investigation at all 98 obstetric departments in the Netherlands. Before the start of each meeting, details of the cases were sent to panel members for individual analysis. During the plenary meeting the findings were discussed, and more detailed information was available if required from the patient dossier. Substandard care was identified on the basis of the opinion of the majority of panel members.
Substandard care was identified in almost 80% of the SAMM cases discussed. Specific recommendations were formulated concerning the procedure of audit and also concerning local and national implementation of guidelines.
Audit merits an important place both nationally and locally in Dutch obstetric practice. Quality improvement is generally possible without large changes to the system, specifically by optimising existing guidelines and putting them into practice.
描述荷兰严重急性孕产妇发病情况的审核,说明审核程序及可能的改进要点。
描述性审核调查。
针对从荷兰所有98个产科部门开展的一项前瞻性、基于人群的队列研究中选取的严重急性孕产妇发病病例,召开了8次审核会议。每次会议开始前,将病例详情发送给小组成员进行个人分析。在全体会议上讨论调查结果,如有需要,可从患者档案中获取更详细的信息。根据大多数小组成员的意见确定不合格护理。
在讨论的几乎80%的严重急性孕产妇发病病例中发现了不合格护理。针对审核程序以及指南在地方和国家层面的实施制定了具体建议。
审核在荷兰产科实践中在国家和地方层面都应占有重要地位。一般来说,无需对系统进行重大变革即可实现质量改进,具体方法是优化现有指南并将其付诸实践。