Department of Medical Biochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Chalubinskiego 10, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.
Clin Biochem. 2011 Apr;44(5-6):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
To devise and evaluate quantitative indices of dynamics in lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), CRP, and procalcitonin concentrations as prognostic markers in sepsis.
Prospective observational cross-sectional study with 5-day follow-up. Simple (Δ(5-1)) and relative (chain indices-based) rates for LBP (ELISA), procalcitonin (immunoluminometry), and CRP were devised.
Admission concentrations of all markers were higher in septic patients than controls. Not the admission levels but markers' time-courses differed between survivors (declining) and non-survivors (persistently high). Simple and relative rates were greater in survivors than non-survivors. Their accuracies as outcome predictors were comparable, higher for LBP and CRP than PCT. At ~95% sensitivity, the highest specificity had LBP relative and simple rates. Except for sepsis severity scores, only LBP was independently associated with lethal outcome.
For outcome prediction, the evaluation of dynamics of sepsis mediators, expressed by simple or relative rates, is a more suitable alternative to markers' peak values.
设计并评估脂多糖结合蛋白(LBP)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)浓度变化的定量指标,作为脓毒症的预后标志物。
前瞻性观察性横断面研究,随访 5 天。设计了 LBP(ELISA)、PCT(免疫发光法)和 CRP 的简单(Δ(5-1))和相对(基于链指数)变化率。
与对照组相比,脓毒症患者入院时所有标志物的浓度均较高。幸存者(下降)和非幸存者(持续升高)之间的差异不是入院水平,而是标志物的时间过程。幸存者的简单和相对变化率大于非幸存者。它们作为预后预测指标的准确性相当,LBP 和 CRP 优于 PCT。在 ~95%的灵敏度下,具有最高特异性的是 LBP 相对和简单变化率。除了脓毒症严重程度评分外,只有 LBP 与致死性结局独立相关。
对于预后预测,用简单或相对变化率表示的脓毒症介质动力学的评估是对标志物峰值的更合适替代方法。