Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Medical Microbiology, Hygiene, Waehringerstrasse 25a, A-1096 Vienna, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Hygiene and Infectious Diseases, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;60(Pt 8):1206-1212. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.028571-0. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Rifaximin is a rifampicin derivative, poorly absorbed by the gastro-intestinal tract. We studied the in vitro susceptibility to rifamixin of 1082 Clostridium difficile isolates; among these, 184 isolates from a strain collection were tested by an in-house rifaximin disc (40 µg) diffusion test, by an in-house rifaximin broth microdilution test, by rifampicin Etest and by rpoB gene sequencing. In the absence of respective CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints for rifaximin and rifampicin against C. difficile we chose MIC ≥32 µg ml(-1) as criterion for reduced in vitro susceptibility. To further validate the disc diffusion test 898 consecutive clinical isolates were analysed using the disc diffusion test, the Etest and rpoB gene sequence analysis for all resistant strains. Rifaximin broth microdilution tests of the 184 reference strains yielded rifaximin MICs ranging from 0.001 (n = 1) to ≥1024 µg ml(-1) (n = 61); 62 isolates showed a reduced susceptibility (MIC ≥32 µg ml(-1)). All of these 62 strains showed rpoB gene mutations producing amino acid substitutions; the rifampicin- and rifaximin-susceptible strains showed either a wild-type sequence or silent amino acid substitutions (19 strains). For 11 arbitrarily chosen isolates with rifaximin MICs of >1024 µg ml(-1), rifaximin end-point MICs were determined by broth dilution: 4096 µg ml(-1) (n = 2), 8192 µg ml(-1) (n = 6), 16,384 µg ml(-1) (n = 2) and 32,678 µg ml(-1) (n = 1). Rifampicin Etests on the 184 C. difficile reference strains yielded MICs ranging from ≤0.002 (n = 117) to ≥32 µg ml(-1) (n = 59). Using a 38 mm inhibition zone as breakpoint for reduced susceptibility the use of rifaximin disc diffusion yielded 59 results correlating with those obtained by use of rifaximin broth microdilution in 98.4 % of the 184 strains tested. Rifampicin Etests performed on the 898 clinical isolates revealed that 67 isolates had MICs of ≥32 µg ml(-1). There were no discordant results observed among these isolates with reduced susceptibility using an MIC of ≥32 µg ml(-1) as breakpoint for reduced rifampicin susceptibility and a <38 mm inhibition zone as breakpoint for reduced rifaximin susceptibility. The prevalence of reduced susceptibility was 7.5 % for all isolates tested. However, for PCR ribotype 027 the prevalence of reduced susceptibility was 26 %. Susceptibility testing in the microbiology laboratory therefore could have an impact on the care and outcome of patients with infection. Our results show that rifaximin--despite its water-insolubility--may be a suitable candidate for disc diffusion testing.
利福昔明是利福平的衍生物,在胃肠道中吸收不良。我们研究了 1082 株艰难梭菌分离株对利福昔明的体外敏感性;其中,184 株来自菌株库的分离株通过内部利福昔明纸片(40μg)扩散试验、内部利福昔明肉汤微量稀释试验、利福平 Etest 和 rpoB 基因测序进行了测试。在没有分别针对利福昔明和利福平对艰难梭菌的 CLSI 或 EUCAST MIC 折点的情况下,我们选择 MIC≥32μg/ml 作为体外敏感性降低的标准。为了进一步验证纸片扩散试验,对 898 例连续临床分离株进行了分析,使用纸片扩散试验、Etest 和 rpoB 基因序列分析所有耐药菌株。184 株参考菌株的利福昔明肉汤微量稀释试验结果显示利福昔明 MIC 范围为 0.001(n=1)至≥1024μg/ml(n=61);62 株显示出降低的敏感性(MIC≥32μg/ml)。所有这些 62 株均显示 rpoB 基因突变导致氨基酸取代;利福平-和利福昔明敏感株显示野生型序列或沉默氨基酸取代(19 株)。对于 11 株随机选择的利福昔明 MIC 大于 1024μg/ml 的分离株,通过肉汤稀释确定利福昔明终点 MIC:4096μg/ml(n=2)、8192μg/ml(n=6)、16384μg/ml(n=2)和 32678μg/ml(n=1)。对 184 株艰难梭菌参考菌株进行利福平 Etest 检测,MIC 范围为≤0.002(n=117)至≥32μg/ml(n=59)。使用 38mm 抑菌圈作为降低敏感性的断点,利福昔明纸片扩散的使用产生了 59 个结果,与使用利福昔明肉汤微量稀释在 98.4%的 184 株受试菌株中获得的结果相关。对 898 例临床分离株进行利福平 Etest 检测,发现 67 株的 MIC≥32μg/ml。在使用 MIC≥32μg/ml 作为降低利福平敏感性的断点和<38mm 抑菌圈作为降低利福昔明敏感性的断点的情况下,这些具有降低敏感性的分离株中没有观察到不一致的结果。所有受试分离株的低敏感性患病率为 7.5%。然而,对于 PCR 核糖体 027,低敏感性患病率为 26%。因此,微生物学实验室的药敏试验可能会影响感染患者的治疗和结果。我们的结果表明,利福昔明——尽管其水溶性差——可能是纸片扩散试验的合适候选药物。