Hecht David W, Galang Minerva A, Sambol Susan P, Osmolski James R, Johnson Stuart, Gerding Dale N
Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Aug;51(8):2716-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01623-06. Epub 2007 May 21.
The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is increasing, and standard treatment is not always effective. Therefore, more-effective antimicrobial agents and treatment strategies are needed. We used the agar dilution method to determine the in vitro susceptibility of the following antimicrobials against 110 toxigenic clinical isolates of C. difficile from 1983 to 2004, primarily from the United States: doripenem, meropenem, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, OPT-80, ramoplanin, rifalazil, rifaximin, nitazoxanide, tizoxanide, tigecycline, vancomycin, tinidazole, and metronidazole. Included among the isolates tested were six strains of the toxinotype III, NAP1/BI/027 group implicated in recent U.S., Canadian, and European outbreaks. The most active agents in vitro were rifaximin, rifalazil, tizoxanide, nitazoxanide, and OPT-80 with MICs at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)) and MIC(90) values of 0.0075 and 0.015 microg/ml, 0.0075 and 0.03 microg/ml, 0.06 and 0.125 microg/ml, 0.06 and 0.125 microg/ml, 0.125 and 0.125 microg/ml, respectively. However, for three isolates the rifalazil and rifaximin MICs were very high (MIC of >256 microg/ml). Ramoplanin, vancomycin, doripenem, and meropenem were also very active in vitro with narrow MIC(50) and MIC(90) ranges. None of the isolates were resistant to metronidazole, the only agent for which there are breakpoints, with tinidazole showing nearly identical results. These in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging and support continued evaluation of selected antimicrobials in clinical trials of treatment for CDAD.
艰难梭菌相关性疾病(CDAD)的发病率和严重程度正在上升,且标准治疗并非总是有效。因此,需要更有效的抗菌药物和治疗策略。我们采用琼脂稀释法,测定了以下抗菌药物对1983年至2004年期间主要来自美国的110株产毒艰难梭菌临床分离株的体外敏感性:多利培南、美罗培南、加替沙星、左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星、OPT-80、雷莫拉宁、利福拉齐、利福昔明、硝唑尼特、替唑尼特、替加环素、万古霉素、替硝唑和甲硝唑。所测试的分离株中包括6株毒素型III、NAP1/BI/027组菌株,它们与近期美国、加拿大和欧洲的疫情爆发有关。体外活性最强的药物是利福昔明、利福拉齐、替唑尼特、硝唑尼特和OPT-80,其50%菌株被抑制时的最低抑菌浓度(MIC50)和MIC90值分别为0.0075和0.015微克/毫升、0.0075和0.03微克/毫升、0.06和0.125微克/毫升、0.06和0.125微克/毫升、0.125和0.125微克/毫升。然而,有3株分离株的利福拉齐和利福昔明MIC值非常高(MIC>256微克/毫升)。雷莫拉宁、万古霉素、多利培南和美罗培南在体外也具有很强的活性,MIC50和MIC90范围较窄。所有分离株对甲硝唑均无耐药性,甲硝唑是唯一有断点值的药物,替硝唑的结果与之几乎相同。这些体外敏感性结果令人鼓舞,并支持在CDAD治疗的临床试验中继续对选定的抗菌药物进行评估。