• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未来流感大流行的抗病毒药物储备策略:从全球流行-经济角度看。

Strategies for antiviral stockpiling for future influenza pandemics: a global epidemic-economic perspective.

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2011 Sep 7;8(62):1307-13. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0715. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2010.0715
PMID:21296791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3140721/
Abstract

Influenza pandemics present a global threat owing to their potential mortality and substantial economic impacts. Stockpiling antiviral drugs to manage a pandemic is an effective strategy to offset their negative impacts; however, little is known about the long-term optimal size of the stockpile under uncertainty and the characteristics of different countries. Using an epidemic-economic model we studied the effect on total mortality and costs of antiviral stockpile sizes for Brazil, China, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, New Zealand, Singapore, the UK, the USA and Zimbabwe. In the model, antivirals stockpiling considerably reduced mortality. There was greater potential avoidance of expected costs in the higher resourced countries (e.g. from $55 billion to $27 billion over a 30 year time horizon for the USA) and large avoidance of fatalities in those less resourced (e.g. from 11.4 to 2.3 million in Indonesia). Under perfect allocation, higher resourced countries should aim to store antiviral stockpiles able to cover at least 15 per cent of their population, rising to 25 per cent with 30 per cent misallocation, to minimize fatalities and economic costs. Stockpiling is estimated not to be cost-effective for two-thirds of the world's population under current antivirals pricing. Lower prices and international cooperation are necessary to make the life-saving potential of antivirals cost-effective in resource-limited countries.

摘要

流感大流行因其潜在的死亡率和巨大的经济影响而构成全球性威胁。储备抗病毒药物以应对大流行是抵消其负面影响的有效策略;然而,在不确定的情况下,储备的最佳长期规模以及不同国家的特点知之甚少。我们使用流行经济学模型研究了巴西、中国、危地马拉、印度、印度尼西亚、新西兰、新加坡、英国、美国和津巴布韦的抗病毒储备规模对总死亡率和成本的影响。在该模型中,抗病毒药物储备大大降低了死亡率。在资源更丰富的国家(例如,在美国,30 年的时间范围内,从 550 亿美元降至 270 亿美元),储备可以更大程度地避免预期成本,而在资源较少的国家(例如,在印度尼西亚,可避免 1140 万人至 230 万人死亡),避免预期成本的潜力更大。在完美分配的情况下,资源更丰富的国家应储备至少能覆盖其 15%人口的抗病毒药物储备,如果存在 30%的分配失误,则应储备能覆盖其 25%人口的抗病毒药物储备,以尽量减少死亡人数和经济成本。根据目前的抗病毒药物定价,全球三分之二的人口估计无法从储备中获得成本效益。需要降低价格和开展国际合作,以使抗病毒药物在资源有限的国家具有成本效益,从而发挥其拯救生命的潜力。

相似文献

1
Strategies for antiviral stockpiling for future influenza pandemics: a global epidemic-economic perspective.未来流感大流行的抗病毒药物储备策略:从全球流行-经济角度看。
J R Soc Interface. 2011 Sep 7;8(62):1307-13. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0715. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
2
A model-based economic analysis of pre-pandemic influenza vaccination cost-effectiveness.基于模型的大流行前流感疫苗接种成本效益经济分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 May 16;14:266. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-266.
3
Cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical-based pandemic influenza mitigation strategies.基于药物的大流行性流感缓解策略的成本效益。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;16(2):224-30. doi: 10.3201/eid1602.090571.
4
Estimation of optimal antiviral stockpile for a novel influenza pandemic.新型流感大流行最佳抗病毒药物储备量的估计。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Jul;15(7):720-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 26.
5
Mitigation of pandemic influenza: review of cost-effectiveness studies.大流行性流感的缓解:成本效益研究综述。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009 Dec;9(6):547-58. doi: 10.1586/erp.09.56.
6
Economics of stockpiling for an influenza pandemic.流感大流行储备的经济学
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;9(8):459-60. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70183-5.
7
Economic analysis of pandemic influenza mitigation strategies for five pandemic severity categories.五种大流行严重程度类别下的大流行性流感缓解策略的经济分析。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 8;13:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-211.
8
Pharmaceutical interventions for mitigating an influenza pandemic: modeling the risks and health-economic impacts.用于减轻流感大流行的药物干预措施:建模风险和健康经济影响。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010 Dec;8(12):1431-9. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.136.
9
Investment in antiviral drugs: a real options approach.抗病毒药物投资:实物期权方法。
Health Econ. 2010 Oct;19(10):1240-54. doi: 10.1002/hec.1549.
10
Influenza antiviral susceptibility monitoring activities in relation to national antiviral stockpiles in Europe during the winter 2006/2007 season.2006/2007年冬季欧洲流感抗病毒药物敏感性监测活动与国家抗病毒药物储备的关系。
Euro Surveill. 2007 Apr 1;12(4):E3-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Impacts of Initiating Vaccination at 3 Months vs. 6 Months in an Influenza Pandemic in the United States.美国流感大流行期间3个月龄与6个月龄开始接种疫苗的经济影响。
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;13(8):828. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13080828.
2
Modeling the impact of early vaccination in an influenza pandemic in the United States.模拟美国流感大流行期间早期疫苗接种的影响。
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Mar 29;10(1):62. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01081-5.
3
A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations and Budget Impact Analyses to Inform Healthcare Decision-Making in Central America.一项关于卫生经济评估和预算影响分析的系统评价,以为中美洲的医疗保健决策提供信息
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):419-440. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00791-y. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
4
DATA-driven shock impact of COVID-19 on the market financial system.数据驱动的新冠疫情对市场金融体系的冲击影响。
Inf Process Manag. 2022 Jan;59(1):102768. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102768. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Estimating the number of averted illnesses and deaths as a result of vaccination against an influenza pandemic in nine low- and middle-income countries.估算九个低收入和中等收入国家因接种流感大流行疫苗而避免的疾病和死亡人数。
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 5;39(30):4219-4230. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
6
An introduction to economic studies, health emergencies, and COVID-19.经济研究、卫生应急和 COVID-19 简介。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 May;13(2):161-167. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12395.
7
Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country.能否将成本效益结果合并为一个连贯的排行榜?来自一个高收入国家的案例研究。
Popul Health Metr. 2019 Aug 5;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x.
8
Antiviral treatment for outpatient use during an influenza pandemic: a decision tree model of outcomes averted and cost-effectiveness.流感大流行期间门诊使用的抗病毒治疗:避免结果和成本效益的决策树模型。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 1;41(2):379-390. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy108.
9
Public preferences for interventions to prevent emerging infectious disease threats: a discrete choice experiment.公众对预防新出现传染病威胁干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 16;8(2):e017355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017355.
10
Malaria and Economic Evaluation Methods: Challenges and Opportunities.疟疾与经济评估方法:挑战与机遇
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):291-297. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0304-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Oseltamivir ring prophylaxis for containment of 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreaks.奥司他韦环式预防以遏制 2009 年 H1N1 流感爆发。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 10;362(23):2166-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908482.
2
Pandemic H1N1 influenza: predicting the course of a pandemic and assessing the efficacy of the planned vaccination programme in the United States.大流行性 H1N1 流感:预测大流行的进程并评估美国计划中的疫苗接种计划的效果。
Euro Surveill. 2009 Oct 15;14(41):19358.
3
Response to a monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine.对单价 2009 流感 A(H1N1)疫苗的反应。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):2405-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907413. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
4
Investment decisions in influenza pandemic contingency planning: cost-effectiveness of stockpiling antiviral drugs.流感大流行应急规划中的投资决策:储备抗病毒药物的成本效益
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Oct;19(5):516-20. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp119. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
5
Economics of stockpiling for an influenza pandemic.流感大流行储备的经济学
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;9(8):459-60. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70183-5.
6
Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A (H1N1): early findings.甲型H1N1流感病毒株的大流行潜力:早期发现。
Science. 2009 Jun 19;324(5934):1557-61. doi: 10.1126/science.1176062. Epub 2009 May 11.
7
Dynamic versus static models in cost-effectiveness analyses of anti-viral drug therapy to mitigate an influenza pandemic.抗病毒药物治疗减轻流感大流行的成本效益分析中的动态模型与静态模型。
Health Econ. 2010 May;19(5):518-31. doi: 10.1002/hec.1485.
8
Economic evaluation of influenza pandemic mitigation strategies in the United States using a stochastic microsimulation transmission model.采用随机微观模拟传播模型对美国流感大流行缓解策略进行的经济性评价。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00437.x. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
9
Cost-effectiveness of antiviral stockpiling and near-patient testing for potential influenza pandemic.抗病毒药物储备及即时检验在潜在流感大流行中的成本效益分析
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Feb;14(2):267-74. doi: 10.3201/eid1402.070478.
10
Economics. Critical assumptions in the Stern Review on climate change.经济学。《斯特恩气候变化评估报告》中的关键假设。
Science. 2007 Jul 13;317(5835):201-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1137316.