Suppr超能文献

院外心肺复苏期间实时反馈的效果:前瞻性、整群随机试验。

Effect of real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside hospital: prospective, cluster-randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3600 Forbes Ave, Suite 400A, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2011 Feb 4;342:d512. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d512.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether real-time audio and visual feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside hospital increases the proportion of subjects who achieved prehospital return of spontaneous circulation.

DESIGN

A cluster-randomised trial.

SUBJECTS

1586 people having cardiac arrest outside hospital in whom resuscitation was attempted by emergency medical services (771 procedures without feedback, 815 with feedback).

SETTING

Emergency medical services from three sites within the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium in the United States and Canada.

INTERVENTION

Real-time audio and visual feedback on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by the monitor-defibrillator.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Prehospital return of spontaneous circulation after CPR.

RESULTS

Baseline patient and emergency medical service characteristics did not differ between groups. Emergency medical services muted the audible feedback in 14% of cases during the period with feedback. Compared with CPR clusters lacking feedback, clusters assigned to feedback were associated with increased proportion of time in which chest compressions were provided (64% v 66%, cluster-adjusted difference 1.9 (95% CI 0.4 to 3.4)), increased compression depth (38 v 40 mm, adjusted difference 1.6 (0.5 to 2.7)), and decreased proportion of compressions with incomplete release (15% v 10%, adjusted difference -3.4 (-5.2 to -1.5)). However, frequency of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation did not differ according to feedback status (45% v 44%, adjusted difference 0.1% (-4.4% to 4.6%)), nor did the presence of a pulse at hospital arrival (32% v 32%, adjusted difference -0.8 (-4.9 to 3.4)), survival to discharge (12% v 11%, adjusted difference -1.5 (-3.9 to 0.9)), or awake at hospital discharge (10% v 10%, adjusted difference -0.2 (-2.5 to 2.1)).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time visual and audible feedback during CPR altered performance to more closely conform with guidelines. However, these changes in CPR performance were not associated with improvements in return of spontaneous circulation or other clinical outcomes. Trial Registration Clinical Trials NCT00539539.

摘要

目的

研究院外心肺复苏时实时音频和可视反馈是否会增加自主循环恢复(ROSC)的比例。

设计

整群随机对照试验。

对象

在美国和加拿大复苏结果联盟的三个站点内的急救医疗服务(EMS)进行尝试复苏的 1586 名院外心脏骤停患者(无反馈 771 例,反馈 815 例)。

设置

EMS。

干预

由监护除颤器提供心肺复苏(CPR)的实时音频和可视反馈。

主要观察指标

CPR 后院外 ROSC。

结果

基线患者和 EMS 特征在组间无差异。在反馈期间,EMS 有 14%的情况下会将声音反馈静音。与缺乏反馈的 CPR 组相比,分配到反馈组的 CPR 组中,胸外按压提供的时间比例增加(64%对 66%,组间调整差异 1.9(95%CI,0.4 到 3.4)),按压深度增加(38 毫米对 40 毫米,调整差异 1.6(0.5 到 2.7)),且不完全释放的按压比例降低(15%对 10%,调整差异-3.4(-5.2 到-1.5))。然而,根据反馈状态,院外 ROSC 的频率没有差异(45%对 44%,调整差异 0.1%(-4.4%至 4.6%)),医院到达时脉搏存在率也没有差异(32%对 32%,调整差异-0.8(-4.9 到 3.4)),出院生存率(12%对 11%,调整差异-1.5(-3.9 到 0.9)),或出院时清醒率(10%对 10%,调整差异-0.2(-2.5 到 2.1))。

结论

CPR 时实时的视听反馈改变了表现,使其更符合指南。然而,CPR 表现的这些变化与 ROSC 或其他临床结果的改善无关。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00539539。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218b/4788084/da8072d6ed0a/hosd799890.f1_default.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验