• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查中的公平性:南澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查计划数据的横断面分析。

Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.

机构信息

Discipline of Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Feb;35(1):61-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00637.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00637.x
PMID:21299702
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) is a population-based screening program based on a mailed screening invitation and immunochemical faecal occult blood test. Initial published evidence from the NBCSP concurs with international evidence on similar colorectal cancer screening programs about the unequal participation by different population sub-groups. The aim of the paper is to present an analysis of the equity of the NBCSP for South Australia, using the concept of horizontal equity, in order to identify geographical areas and population groups which may benefit from targeted approaches to increase participation rates in colorectal cancer screening.

METHOD

De-identified data from the NBCSP (February 2007 to July 2008) were provided by Medicare Australia. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were undertaken in order to identify the predictors of participation rates in the NBCSP.

RESULTS

The overall participation rate was 46.1%, although this was statistically significantly different (p<0.001) by gender (42.6% for males and 49.5% for females), socioeconomic status (40% in most deprived quintile through to 48.1% in most affluent quintile) and remoteness (45.6% for metropolitan, 46% for remote and 48.6% for rural areas). These findings were confirmed in multivariate analyses. Of the NBCSP participants, 0.24% (CI 95% 0.20-0.30) identified themselves as Indigenous and 8% (CI 95% 7.7-8.3) reported speaking a language other than English at home.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study suggest inequities in participation in the NBCSP on the basis of gender, geographical location, Indigenous status and language spoken at home.

摘要

目的

国家肠癌筛查计划(NBCSP)是一项基于邮寄筛查邀请和免疫化学粪便潜血试验的基于人群的筛查计划。NBCSP 的初步发表证据与类似结直肠癌筛查计划的国际证据一致,涉及不同人群亚组参与率的不平等。本文旨在使用横向公平的概念,对南澳大利亚的 NBCSP 进行公平性分析,以确定可能受益于有针对性方法提高结直肠癌筛查参与率的地理区域和人群群体。

方法

澳大利亚医保提供了 NBCSP(2007 年 2 月至 2008 年 7 月)的匿名数据。进行了单变量和多变量统计分析,以确定 NBCSP 参与率的预测因素。

结果

总体参与率为 46.1%,尽管在性别(男性为 42.6%,女性为 49.5%)、社会经济地位(最贫困五分位数为 40%,最富裕五分位数为 48.1%)和偏远程度(大都市为 45.6%,偏远地区为 46%,农村地区为 48.6%)方面存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。这些发现在多变量分析中得到了证实。在 NBCSP 参与者中,0.24%(95%CI 0.20-0.30)自我认定为原住民,8%(95%CI 7.7-8.3)报告在家中说英语以外的语言。

结论

本研究结果表明,NBCSP 在性别、地理位置、原住民身份和在家中所说语言方面存在参与不公平现象。

相似文献

1
Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.结直肠癌筛查中的公平性:南澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查计划数据的横断面分析。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Feb;35(1):61-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00637.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
2
Colorectal cancer screening in rural and remote areas: analysis of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.农村和偏远地区的结直肠癌筛查:南澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查项目数据分析
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2):1648. Epub 2011 May 12.
3
Equity of colorectal cancer screening: which groups have inequitable participation and what can we do about it?结直肠癌筛查的公平性:哪些群体参与度不公平,我们对此能做些什么?
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(4):334-46. doi: 10.1071/PY11055.
4
Australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划:它对澳大利亚原住民有效吗?
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 25;10:373. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-373.
5
Geographic variation in compliance with Australian colorectal cancer screening programs: the role of attitudinal and cognitive traits.澳大利亚结直肠癌筛查项目依从性的地理差异:态度和认知特征的作用。
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Jul;19(3):4957. doi: 10.22605/RRH4957. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Socio-demographic factors drive regional differences in participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program - An ecological analysis.社会人口因素导致全国肠癌筛查计划参与度的地区差异——一项生态学分析。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Feb;42(1):92-97. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12722. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
7
Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Australia: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.与澳大利亚结直肠癌筛查参与相关的因素:45 岁及以上研究队列的结果。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
8
Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.基于粪便潜血检测(FOBT)的结直肠癌筛查趋势及未使用的预测因素:南澳大利亚地区的研究结果及对提高FOBT接受率的启示
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):45-52. doi: 10.1071/AH16126.
9
Participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program by people with severe mental illness, Australia, 2006-2019: a national data linkage study.2006 - 2019年澳大利亚重度精神疾病患者参与国家肠癌筛查计划:一项全国性数据关联研究
Med J Aust. 2024 Dec 9;221(11):617-622. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52521. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
10
Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的长期获益、危害和成本效益的评估:一项建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Jul;2(7):e331-e340. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30105-6. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial variability in socio-demographic factors affecting participation in the Australian national bowel cancer screening program.影响参与澳大利亚全国肠癌筛查项目的社会人口学因素的空间变异性。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Nov 22;6:100452. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100452. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.社会经济地位与结直肠癌筛查计划中粪便潜血试验依从性的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Oct 31;9:e48150. doi: 10.2196/48150.
3
Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review.
大规模邮寄粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查外展项目的患者选择:系统评价。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):379-388. doi: 10.1177/0969141321997482. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Patterns of participation over four rounds of annual fecal immunochemical test-based screening for colorectal cancer: what predicts rescreening?四轮基于粪便免疫化学检测的年度结直肠癌筛查中的参与模式:什么因素能预测再次筛查?
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4634-8.
5
Association between socioeconomic deprivation and colorectal cancer screening outcomes: Low uptake rates among the most and least deprived people.社会经济剥夺与结直肠癌筛查结果之间的关联:最贫困和最不贫困人群的低接受率。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 16;12(6):e0179864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179864. eCollection 2017.
6
A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.澳大利亚结直肠癌管理与治疗结果的地理差异系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3067-1.
7
Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous groups.对结直肠癌筛查的机构(不)信任:一项针对希腊、伊朗、英裔澳大利亚人和原住民群体的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2915-27. doi: 10.1111/hex.12276. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
8
Cancer Screening among immigrants living in urban and regional Australia: results from the 45 and up study.居住在澳大利亚城市和地区的移民中的癌症筛查:“45岁及以上”研究结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 14;11(8):8251-66. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110808251.
9
Birthplace is not a determinant of colorectal adenomas.出生地并非结直肠腺瘤的决定因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8606-11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8606.
10
Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.连续三次粪便潜血试验筛查机会依从性的行为和人口统计学预测因素:一项人群研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 7;14:238. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-238.