• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会人口因素导致全国肠癌筛查计划参与度的地区差异——一项生态学分析。

Socio-demographic factors drive regional differences in participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program - An ecological analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland.

School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Feb;42(1):92-97. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12722. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1111/1753-6405.12722
PMID:29044846
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine if geographic variations in the participation rates in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) are related to population-level socio-demographic characteristics.

METHODS

Data reflecting participation in the NBCSP for 504 Local Government Areas (LGAs) between July 2011 and June 2013 were extracted from the Social Health Atlas of Australia. Logistic regression models were used to examine independent associations (odds ratios [ORs]) between participation, Remoteness Area (RA) and selected socio-demographic variables.

RESULTS

Compared to the participation rate for major cities (33.4%), participation was significantly higher in inner regional areas (36.5%, OR=1.15), but was much lower in remote (27.9%, OR=0.77) or very remote areas (25.0%, OR=0.65). When controlling for study period, gender, proportion of persons aged 65 years and older, Indigenous status, cultural background and socioeconomic status, significantly higher rates were observed in all non-metropolitan areas than in major cities. Indigenous status was strongly related to the poorer participation in remote areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Socio-demographic characteristics, particularly Indigenous status, cultural background and population ageing, seem to be more important drivers of regional disparities in NBCSP participation than geographic remoteness. Implications for public health: This study provides important evidence to understand the regional disparities in participating in the national screening program.

摘要

目的

研究国家肠癌筛查计划(NBCSP)参与率的地域差异是否与人口水平的社会人口统计学特征有关。

方法

从澳大利亚社会卫生地图集提取了 2011 年 7 月至 2013 年 6 月期间 504 个地方政府区域(LGA)参与 NBCSP 的数据。使用逻辑回归模型检查参与率与偏远地区(RA)和选定社会人口统计学变量之间的独立关联(比值比[OR])。

结果

与大城市(33.4%)的参与率相比,内城区的参与率明显更高(36.5%,OR=1.15),而偏远地区(27.9%,OR=0.77)或非常偏远地区(25.0%,OR=0.65)的参与率则低得多。在控制研究期间、性别、65 岁及以上人口比例、土著身份、文化背景和社会经济地位后,所有非大都市地区的参与率均明显高于大城市。土著身份与偏远地区参与率较低密切相关。

结论

社会人口统计学特征,特别是土著身份、文化背景和人口老龄化,似乎比地理偏远更能成为 NBCSP 参与率地域差异的重要驱动因素。对公共卫生的影响:本研究提供了重要证据,有助于理解全国筛查计划参与方面的地域差异。

相似文献

1
Socio-demographic factors drive regional differences in participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program - An ecological analysis.社会人口因素导致全国肠癌筛查计划参与度的地区差异——一项生态学分析。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Feb;42(1):92-97. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12722. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Colorectal cancer screening in rural and remote areas: analysis of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.农村和偏远地区的结直肠癌筛查:南澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查项目数据分析
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2):1648. Epub 2011 May 12.
3
Geographic variation in compliance with Australian colorectal cancer screening programs: the role of attitudinal and cognitive traits.澳大利亚结直肠癌筛查项目依从性的地理差异:态度和认知特征的作用。
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Jul;19(3):4957. doi: 10.22605/RRH4957. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划:它对澳大利亚原住民有效吗?
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 25;10:373. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-373.
5
Equity of colorectal cancer screening: which groups have inequitable participation and what can we do about it?结直肠癌筛查的公平性:哪些群体参与度不公平,我们对此能做些什么?
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(4):334-46. doi: 10.1071/PY11055.
6
History, development and future of cancer screening in Australia.澳大利亚癌症筛查的历史、发展与未来。
Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Jul 26;27(3):2731725. doi: 10.17061/phrp2731725.
7
Beliefs about bowel cancer among the target group for the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查计划目标人群对肠癌的认知。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Apr;34(2):187-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00505.x.
8
Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.结直肠癌筛查中的公平性:南澳大利亚国家肠癌筛查计划数据的横断面分析。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Feb;35(1):61-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00637.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
9
Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的长期获益、危害和成本效益的评估:一项建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Jul;2(7):e331-e340. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30105-6. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
10
The first comprehensive report on Indigenous Australian women's inequalities in cervical screening: A retrospective registry cohort study in Queensland, Australia (2000-2011).关于澳大利亚原住民女性宫颈癌筛查不平等状况的首份综合报告:澳大利亚昆士兰州的一项回顾性登记队列研究(2000 - 2011年)。
Cancer. 2016 May 15;122(10):1560-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29954. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015-2020.澳大利亚 2015-2020 年结直肠癌筛查参与的地域和空间差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0288992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288992. eCollection 2023.
2
Small-Area Geographic and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer in Cyprus.塞浦路斯结直肠癌的小区域地理和社会经济不平等。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;20(1):341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010341.
3
Urban density differences in colorectal cancer screening participation and screening yield in The Netherlands.
荷兰结直肠癌筛查参与率和筛查阳性率的城市密度差异
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Apr 5;27:101791. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101791. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Population-Based Data Reveal Factors Associated with Organised and Non-Organised Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Important Step towards Improving Coverage.基于人群的数据揭示了与有组织和无组织结直肠癌筛查相关的因素:这是提高覆盖率的重要一步。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 7;18(16):8373. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168373.
5
Impact of a mass media campaign on participation rates in a National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: a field experiment.大众媒体宣传活动对国家肠癌筛查计划参与率的影响:一项现场试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e024267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024267.
6
Geographic Disparities in Previously Diagnosed Health Conditions in Colorectal Cancer Patients Are Largely Explained by Age and Area Level Disadvantage.结直肠癌患者既往诊断出的健康状况的地域差异在很大程度上可由年龄和地区层面的劣势来解释。
Front Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;8:372. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00372. eCollection 2018.