Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3124-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009772108. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
Gene-knockout experiments on single-cell organisms have established that expression of a substantial fraction of genes is not needed for optimal growth. This problem acquired a new dimension with the recent discovery that environmental and genetic perturbations of the bacterium Escherichia coli are followed by the temporary activation of a large number of latent metabolic pathways, which suggests the hypothesis that temporarily activated reactions impact growth and hence facilitate adaptation in the presence of perturbations. Here, we test this hypothesis computationally and find, surprisingly, that the availability of latent pathways consistently offers no growth advantage and tends, in fact, to inhibit growth after genetic perturbations. This is shown to be true even for latent pathways with a known function in alternate conditions, thus extending the significance of this adverse effect beyond apparently nonessential genes. These findings raise the possibility that latent pathway activation is in fact derivative of another, potentially suboptimal, adaptive response.
在单细胞生物上进行的基因敲除实验已经证实,大量基因的表达对于最佳生长并非必需。随着最近的一项发现,这个问题有了新的维度,即细菌大肠杆菌的环境和遗传干扰会导致大量潜伏代谢途径的暂时激活,这表明了一个假设,即暂时激活的反应会影响生长,从而在存在干扰时促进适应。在这里,我们通过计算来检验这个假设,令人惊讶的是,潜伏途径的可用性实际上并没有提供任何生长优势,反而在遗传干扰后往往会抑制生长。即使对于在其他条件下具有已知功能的潜伏途径,这也是如此,因此,这种不利影响的意义远远超出了明显非必需的基因。这些发现提出了一种可能性,即潜伏途径的激活实际上是另一种潜在的次优适应反应的结果。