Suppr超能文献

高血压合并其他危险因素患者中积极的多重心血管危险因素管理与常规治疗的比较:CRUCIAL 试验。

Proactive multiple cardiovascular risk factor management compared with usual care in patients with hypertension and additional risk factors: the CRUCIAL trial.

机构信息

Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Apr;27(4):821-33. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.555754. Epub 2011 Feb 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a proactive multifactorial risk factor intervention strategy using single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin (5/10, 10/10 mg) in addition to other antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy, as required, resulted in greater reduction in calculated Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk compared with usual care (UC) after 52-weeks treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective, multinational, open-label, cluster randomized trial, with the investigator as the unit of randomization. Eligible hypertensive patients were 35-79 years of age, with ≥3 additional cardiovascular risk factors, but no history of CHD and baseline total cholesterol (TC) ≤6.5 mmol/l.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov ; trial identifier NCT00407537.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary endpoint was calculated Framingham 10-year CHD risk at 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 140 randomized sites, 136 sites contributed 1461 patients. Mean baseline age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were comparable between treatment arms. Mean baseline BP (150.3/89.7 vs. 144.3/86.5 mmHg) and Framingham CHD risk (20.0 vs. 18.1%) were higher in the proactive intervention versus the UC arm (p < 0.002 for both). At week 52, mean CHD risk was 12.5% in the proactive intervention arm and 16.3% in the UC arm (p < 0.001). The difference, observed at weeks 16 and 52, was primarily driven by significant differences in systolic BP and in TC between the two arms. Overall, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 48.8% and 44.0% of patients in the proactive intervention and the UC arm, respectively. Although there were differences in the incidence of AEs between the treatment arms, the AE profile in the proactive intervention arm was consistent with previous safety experience for this medication.

CONCLUSIONS

A proactive multifactorial risk factor intervention strategy that simultaneously treated both BP and cholesterol regardless of individual risk factors per se, is more effective in reducing calculated Framingham 10-year CHD risk than UC in patients with hypertension and additional risk factors.

摘要

目的

研究在常规治疗(UC)的基础上,是否可以通过使用氨氯地平阿托伐他汀单片复方制剂(5/10、10/10mg)进行主动的多因素危险因素干预策略,在 52 周的治疗后,计算出的弗莱明翰 10 年冠心病(CHD)风险有更大的降低。

研究设计与方法

前瞻性、多国、开放性、集群随机试验,以研究者为单位进行随机分组。符合条件的高血压患者年龄 35-79 岁,有≥3 个其他心血管危险因素,但无 CHD 病史,基线总胆固醇(TC)≤6.5mmol/l。

临床试验注册

www.ClinicalTrials.gov;试验标识符 NCT00407537。

主要终点

52 周时计算出的弗莱明翰 10 年 CHD 风险。

结果

在 140 个随机化的地点中,有 136 个地点贡献了 1461 名患者。治疗组之间的平均基线年龄和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)相当。主动干预组的平均基线血压(150.3/89.7 与 144.3/86.5mmHg)和弗莱明翰 CHD 风险(20.0 与 18.1%)高于 UC 组(均<0.002)。在第 52 周时,主动干预组的平均 CHD 风险为 12.5%,UC 组为 16.3%(p<0.001)。在第 16 周和第 52 周观察到的差异主要是由于两组之间的收缩压和 TC 存在显著差异。总的来说,主动干预组和 UC 组分别有 48.8%和 44.0%的患者报告了不良事件(AE)。尽管治疗组之间 AE 的发生率存在差异,但主动干预组的 AE 情况与该药物的先前安全性经验一致。

结论

主动的多因素危险因素干预策略同时治疗血压和胆固醇,而不考虑个体危险因素本身,在高血压和其他危险因素的患者中,降低计算出的弗莱明翰 10 年 CHD 风险比 UC 更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验