St Paul's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Postgrad Med. 2012 Jul;124(4):41-53. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2012.07.2565.
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors are at very high risk for future CV events. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of a proactive, multifactorial CV risk factor-management strategy based on single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin (SPAA) versus continuing physicians' usual care (UC) over 52 weeks in patients with and without DM. Patients with hypertension and ≥ 3 additional CV risk factors from the Cluster Randomized Usual Care vs Caduet Investigation Assessing Long-Term-Risk (CRUCIAL) trial--an open-label, cluster-randomized trial conducted in 19 countries--were enrolled and randomized to receive proactive intervention (based on SPAA 5/10 to 10/20 mg) or UC (based on investigators' best clinical judgment). Patients were analyzed according to baseline DM status. Six hundred patients had DM. Patients with DM in the SPAA and UC arms had mean ages of 61.8 and 61.5 years, respectively, and an absolute coronary heart disease (CHD) risk of 25.2% and 21.5%, respectively. Among non-DM patients, mean ages were 58.6 and 59.5 years, respectively, and CHD risk was 16.0% vs 15.7%, respectively. Least-squares mean treatment differences in percentage change from baseline in calculated 10-year Framingham CHD risk were -26.3% vs -27.3% among DM and non-DM patients (adjusted for respective baseline values) (both P < 0.0001). Among DM and non-DM patients, adverse events were reported in 52.8% versus 45.6% in the SPAA and 49.6% versus 41.6% in the UC arms, respectively. This global risk-management approach, simultaneously targeting blood pressure and lipids, was more effective for reducing calculated 10-year Framingham CHD risk than UC in patients with DM. While blood pressure changes were of smaller magnitude among patients with DM, this strategy reduced overall risk to an extent comparable with that observed in non-DM patients. Further studies are thus warranted to study this proactive risk factor intervention on CV or mortality endpoints in patients with and without DM.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00407537.
目的:本研究旨在评估基于氨氯地平阿托伐他汀单片复方制剂(SPAA)的积极、多因素心血管(CV)危险因素管理策略与继续接受医生常规治疗(UC)相比,在伴或不伴糖尿病(DM)的患者中 52 周时的疗效和安全性。
方法:该研究纳入了来自 Cluster Randomized Usual Care vs Caduet Investigation Assessing Long-Term-Risk(CRUCIAL)试验的高血压和≥3 种其他 CV 危险因素的患者,该试验为一项在 19 个国家进行的开放性、集群随机试验。这些患者被随机分配接受积极干预(基于 SPAA 5/10 至 10/20 mg)或 UC(基于研究者的最佳临床判断)。根据基线 DM 状态对患者进行分析。
结果:共纳入 600 例 DM 患者,SPAA 和 UC 组的 DM 患者平均年龄分别为 61.8 岁和 61.5 岁,绝对冠心病(CHD)风险分别为 25.2%和 21.5%。非 DM 患者的平均年龄分别为 58.6 岁和 59.5 岁,CHD 风险分别为 16.0%和 15.7%。DM 和非 DM 患者从基线计算的 10 年 Framingham CHD 风险百分比变化的最小二乘均值治疗差异分别为-26.3%和-27.3%(根据各自的基线值进行调整)(均 P<0.0001)。在 DM 和非 DM 患者中,SPAA 组和 UC 组分别有 52.8%和 45.6%报告不良事件(49.6%和 41.6%)。
结论:与 UC 相比,这种同时针对血压和血脂的全球风险管理方法在 DM 患者中更有效地降低了计算的 10 年Framingham CHD 风险。尽管 DM 患者的血压变化幅度较小,但该策略降低了整体风险,其程度与非 DM 患者相当。因此,有必要进一步研究该积极的危险因素干预对 DM 和非 DM 患者的 CV 或死亡率终点的影响。
临床试验注册:www.ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT00407537。