François P, Sellier E, Pouzol P, Bal G, Labarère J
Unité d'évaluation médicale, pôle de santé publique, pavillon Taillefer, CHU de Grenoble, BP 217, 38043 Grenoble cedex 09, France.
Transfus Clin Biol. 2011 Feb;18(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2010.10.003.
The mortality and morbidity conference (MMC) is one of the keystones in the evaluation of quality of care. The objective of this work was to describe a MMC by presenting a case report.
A 16-year old man suffering from chronic anaemia had to be transfused with two units of red blood cells in an outpatient unit. Although the transfusion went well for the first unit, the patient presented haemolysis during the transfusion of the second unit because the nurse administered the wrong unit. The incident was analysed during a mortality and morbidity conference with the attendance of the hemovigilance local correspondent. Immediate causes of the event were the failure to respect the transfusion procedure: in advance compatibility testing, failure to check the patient and blood component identification just before the transfusion. Factors contributing to the event were the deviation of transfusion practices, poor working conditions of nurses, linked to inadequate staff in relation to the activity. The discussion of the incident led to develop an action plan.
This case shows the interest for staff members to discuss an adverse event. However, a well-defined methodology for conducting mortality and morbidity conferences is lacking and leads to a wide heterogeneity between teams. Major differences refer to criteria for case selection and quality of participants. This heterogeneity is likely to have an impact of the efficacy of mortality and morbidity conferences regarding the quality and safety of care.
死亡率和发病率会议(MMC)是医疗质量评估的关键环节之一。本研究旨在通过病例报告描述一次MMC。
一名16岁慢性贫血男性患者在门诊接受了两单位红细胞输注。虽然第一单位输血过程顺利,但在输注第二单位时,由于护士输错血袋,患者出现溶血。该事件在死亡率和发病率会议上进行了分析,当地血液警戒通讯员也出席了会议。事件的直接原因是未遵守输血程序:提前进行相容性检测,输血前未核对患者和血液成分标识。促成该事件的因素包括输血操作偏差、护士工作条件差,这与活动相关人员不足有关。对该事件的讨论促成了一项行动计划的制定。
该病例表明工作人员讨论不良事件的重要性。然而,目前缺乏明确的死亡率和发病率会议开展方法,导致各团队之间存在很大差异。主要差异体现在病例选择标准和参与者素质方面。这种差异可能会影响死亡率和发病率会议在医疗质量和安全方面的效果。