Suppr超能文献

早期静脉血栓栓塞预防措施对于合并颅内出血的创伤患者是否安全?

Is early venous thromboembolism prophylaxis safe in trauma patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

作者信息

Koehler Daniel M, Shipman Jason, Davidson Mario A, Guillamondegui Oscar

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Feb;70(2):324-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820b5d22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are at high risk for venous thromboembolic sequelae; however, prophylaxis is often delayed because of the perceived risk of intracranial hemorrhagic exacerbation. The goal of this study was to determine whether enoxaparin for early venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is safe for hemodynamically stable patients with TBIs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study from a Level I Trauma Center of patients with TBIs receiving early (0-72 hours) or late (>72 hours) VTE prophylaxis. Inclusion criteria included evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhagic injury (IHI) on admission computed tomography, head/neck abbreviated injury score≥3, age≥16 years, and hospital length of stay≥72 hours. Exclusion criteria included intracranial pressure monitor/ventriculostomy, current systemic anticoagulation, pregnancy, coagulopathy, history of DVT, ongoing intra-abdominal hemorrhage 24 hours postadmission, and preexisting inferior vena cava filter. Progression of IHI defined as lesion expansion/new IHI on repeat computed tomography.

RESULTS

Totally, 669 patients were identified: 268 early (40.1%) and 401 late (59.9%), with a mean injury severity score of 27.8±10.2 and 29.4±11, respectively. Head neck abbreviated injury score of 3 (47% vs. 34%), 4 (42% vs. 46%), 5 (11% vs. 19%), and 6 (0% vs. 1%) were reported for the early and late treatment groups, respectively. Mean time to prophylaxis was 2.77 days±0.49 days and 5.31 days±1.97 days. IHI progression before prophylaxis was 9.38% versus 17.41% (p<0.001) and after prophylaxis was 1.46% versus 1.54% (p>0.9). Proportions of proximal DVT were 1.5% versus 3.5% (p=0.117) and pulmonary embolism were 1.5% versus 2.2% (p=0.49). There were no differences in injury severity score, age, and pelvic and/or long bone fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that early VTE prophylaxis increases the rate of IHI progression in hemodynamically stable patients with TBIs. The natural rate of IHI progression observed is comparable with previous studies. Although not powered to detect differences in the incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism, the data trend toward increased proportions of both VTE outcomes in the late group.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者发生静脉血栓栓塞后遗症的风险很高;然而,由于担心颅内出血加重,预防措施往往会延迟。本研究的目的是确定对于血流动力学稳定的TBI患者,早期使用依诺肝素预防静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是否安全。

方法

这是一项来自一级创伤中心的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为接受早期(0 - 72小时)或晚期(>72小时)VTE预防的TBI患者。纳入标准包括入院计算机断层扫描显示急性颅内出血性损伤(IHI)的证据、头部/颈部简明损伤评分≥3、年龄≥16岁以及住院时间≥72小时。排除标准包括颅内压监测器/脑室造瘘术、当前全身抗凝治疗、妊娠、凝血病、深静脉血栓形成病史、入院后24小时内持续腹腔内出血以及既往存在下腔静脉滤器。IHI进展定义为重复计算机断层扫描时病变扩大/新出现的IHI。

结果

共确定669例患者:268例早期(40.1%)和401例晚期(59.9%),平均损伤严重程度评分分别为27.8±10.2和29.4±11。早期和晚期治疗组报告的头部颈部简明损伤评分为3分(47%对34%)、4分(42%对46%)、5分(11%对19%)和6分(0%对1%)。预防的平均时间分别为2.77天±0.49天和5.31天±1.97天。预防前IHI进展分别为9.38%和17.41%(p<0.001),预防后分别为1.46%和1.54%(p>0.9)。近端深静脉血栓形成的比例分别为1.5%和3.5%(p = 0.117),肺栓塞的比例分别为1.5%和2.2%(p = 0.49)。在损伤严重程度评分、年龄以及骨盆和/或长骨骨折方面没有差异。

结论

我们没有发现证据表明早期VTE预防会增加血流动力学稳定的TBI患者IHI进展的发生率。观察到的IHI自然进展率与先前的研究相当。尽管没有足够的能力检测深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞发生率的差异,但数据显示晚期组两种VTE结局的比例有增加趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验