Duke University, DUMC 104002, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Sports Biomech. 2010 Nov;9(4):270-9. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2010.539623.
The purpose of this study is to examine the peak sagittal plane joint angles and joint moments of the lower extremity during the deep squat (DS) movement of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) to assess differences between the classifications (1,2,3). Twenty-eight participants volunteered for the study and were screened to assess their FMS score on the DS task. All participants underwent a quantitative movement analysis performing the FMS DS movement at a self-selected speed. The participants in Group 3 exhibited greater dorsiflexion excursion compared to those in Group 1. Participants in Group 3 had greater peak knee flexion and knee flexion excursion than those in Group 2 who exhibited more than the participants in Group 1. Group 3 also exhibited a greater peak knee extension moment compared to Group 1. At the hip, Groups 3 and 2 exhibited greater peak hip flexion, hip flexion excursion and peak hip extension moment compared to Group 1. Thus, it appears that individuals who score differently on the deep squat as determined by the FMS exhibit differences in mechanics that may be beneficial in assessing strategies for interventions. Future research should assess how fundamental changes in mobility and stability independently affect DS performance.
本研究旨在探讨功能性运动筛查(FMS)中深蹲(DS)运动时下肢矢状面关节角度和关节力矩,以评估分类(1、2、3)之间的差异。28 名参与者自愿参加了这项研究,并对他们的 FMS 评分进行了 DS 任务筛查。所有参与者都进行了定量运动分析,以自我选择的速度执行 FMS DS 运动。与第 1 组相比,第 3 组的背屈幅度更大。与第 2 组相比,第 3 组的峰值膝关节屈曲和膝关节屈曲幅度更大,而第 2 组的膝关节伸展幅度比第 1 组大。与第 1 组相比,第 3 组还表现出更大的峰值膝关节伸展力矩。在髋关节方面,第 3 组和第 2 组的髋关节屈曲、髋关节屈曲幅度和髋关节伸展力矩峰值均大于第 1 组。因此,似乎在 FMS 确定的深蹲中得分不同的个体在力学方面存在差异,这可能有助于评估干预策略。未来的研究应该评估运动和稳定性的基本变化如何独立影响 DS 的表现。