Lin Wei-Hsuan, Huang Tsung-Yu, Chen Shu-Wei, Hamill Joseph, Kung Jung-Tang, Tang Wen-Tzu
Graduate Institute of Athletics and Coaching Science, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan 333325, Taiwan.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 2;11(3):248. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030248.
This study investigates the influence of the quality of the "deep squat" movement, adapted from the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) system, on the lower extremity movement pattern during baseball throwing, and its potential impact on throwing performance and propulsion efficiency. Twenty-two baseball players were recruited and categorized into two groups: 13 in the high-score squat group (HSS) and 9 in the low-score squat group (LSS), based on their deep squat screening results. This research explored disparities in ball velocity, propulsion efficiency, propulsion ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics, and throwing kinematics between these two groups. The findings revealed no significant difference in ball velocity between the groups. However, the LSS group demonstrated a lower propulsion GRF efficiency ( < 0.030, ES = 0.46), along with a higher vertical peak GRF ( < 0.002, ES = 0.66). In the pivot leg, the HSS group exhibited significantly lower impulse forces in the Impulse Fresultant ( < 0.035, ES = 0.45), throwing direction ( < 0.049, ES = 0.42), and vertical direction ( < 0.048, ES = 0.42). Additionally, the contribution to the ball velocity of the pivot leg was significantly greater in the HSS group, along with significantly better efficiency in Impulse Fresultant ( < 0.035, ES = 0.45), throwing direction ( < 0.053, ES = 0.41), and vertical direction ( < 0.032, ES = 0.46). In the leading leg, the HSS group demonstrated significantly lower impulse forces in the Impulse Fresultant ( < 0.001, ES = 0.69), throwing direction ( < 0.007, ES = 0.58), and vertical direction ( < 0.001, ES = 0.70). Moreover, the contribution to the ball velocity of the leading leg was significantly greater in the HSS group, accompanied by significantly better efficiency in Impulse Fresultant ( < 0.003, ES = 0.63), throwing direction ( < 0.005, ES = 0.60), and vertical direction ( < 0.021, ES = 0.49). In conclusion, this study suggests that squat screening is a valuable tool for assessing propulsion efficiency. Coaches and trainers should be mindful of players with low squat quality but high throwing performance, as they may face increased impact and injury risks in the future.
本研究调查了源自功能性动作筛查(FMS)系统的“深蹲”动作质量对棒球投球过程中下肢运动模式的影响,及其对投球表现和推进效率的潜在影响。招募了22名棒球运动员,并根据他们的深蹲筛查结果分为两组:高分深蹲组(HSS)13人,低分深蹲组(LSS)9人。本研究探讨了这两组在球速、推进效率、推进地面反作用力(GRF)特征和投球运动学方面的差异。研究结果显示,两组之间的球速没有显著差异。然而,LSS组的推进GRF效率较低(<0.030,效应量=0.46),同时垂直峰值GRF较高(<0.002,效应量=0.66)。在枢轴腿方面,HSS组在合力冲量(<0.035,效应量=0.45)、投球方向(<0.049,效应量=0.42)和垂直方向(<0.048,效应量=0.42)上表现出明显较低的冲量。此外,HSS组枢轴腿对球速的贡献显著更大,在合力冲量(<0.035,效应量=0.45)、投球方向(<0.053,效应量=0.41)和垂直方向(<0.032,效应量=0.46)上的效率也明显更高。在引导腿方面,HSS组在合力冲量(<0.001,效应量=0.69)、投球方向(<0.007,效应量=0.58)和垂直方向(<0.001,效应量=0.70)上表现出明显较低的冲量。此外,HSS组引导腿对球速的贡献显著更大,在合力冲量(<0.003,效应量=0.63)、投球方向(<0.005,效应量=0.60)和垂直方向(<0.021,效应量=0.49)上的效率也明显更高。总之,本研究表明深蹲筛查是评估推进效率的一个有价值的工具。教练和训练师应该关注深蹲质量低但投球表现高的球员,因为他们未来可能面临更大的冲击和受伤风险。