• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配镜处方 II:从业者的经验与建议部分处方的可能性相关。

Spectacle prescribing II: practitioner experience is linked to the likelihood of suggesting a partial prescription.

机构信息

Bradford School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Mar;31(2):155-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00803.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00803.x
PMID:21309802
Abstract

PURPOSE

A follow up study to investigate whether UK optometrists partially prescribe significant changes in refractive correction to assist patient adaptation and whether various aspects of practitioner profiles are linked to the nature of these prescribing decisions.

METHOD

A case scenario type questionnaire was distributed by post and via the internet to UK optometrists. Five case scenarios were described that included information on patient age, symptoms, habitual refractive correction (if any), subjective refraction and any other relevant clinical information. In each case respondents were asked to indicate and justify what refractive correction they would prescribe.

RESULTS

A total of 592 questionnaires were completed. Between 41% and 84% prescribed the subjective refraction result depending on the scenario. The likelihood of partial prescribing increased by 34% for every 10 years following qualification and thus after a typical 40 year career, respondents were now over three times more likely to partially prescribe. There were no other links with the propensity to partially prescribe.

CONCLUSION

The subjective refraction result exerted a strong hold on the reported prescribing outcome, particularly for newly qualified optometrists. Partial prescribing was increasingly proposed the greater the number of years the respondent had been qualified. This suggests that with increasing exposure to patients who return dissatisfied with their spectacles, a greater appreciation of partial prescribing is gained. This link seems to be an important finding that provides significant support for the prescribing rules suggested by textbooks, which are not yet supported by research evidence.

摘要

目的

一项后续研究旨在调查英国验光师是否部分调整屈光矫正处方以帮助患者适应,以及从业者特征的各个方面是否与这些处方决策的性质有关。

方法

通过邮寄和互联网向英国验光师分发案例情景类型问卷。描述了五个案例情景,包括患者年龄、症状、习惯性屈光矫正(如有)、主观验光和任何其他相关临床信息。在每种情况下,要求受访者表明并证明他们将开出何种屈光矫正处方。

结果

共完成了 592 份问卷。根据情景,有 41%至 84%的人开了主观验光结果。每增加 10 年的资格后,部分处方的可能性增加 34%,因此在典型的 40 年职业生涯后,现在受访者部分处方的可能性增加了三倍多。没有其他与部分处方倾向有关的联系。

结论

主观验光结果对报告的处方结果有很强的影响,特别是对刚获得资格的验光师。随着受访者获得资格的年限增加,部分处方的提议越来越多。这表明,随着越来越多的患者对他们的眼镜不满意而返回,对部分处方的认识也越来越深刻。这种联系似乎是一个重要的发现,为教科书中建议的处方规则提供了重要支持,而这些规则尚未得到研究证据的支持。

相似文献

1
Spectacle prescribing II: practitioner experience is linked to the likelihood of suggesting a partial prescription.配镜处方 II:从业者的经验与建议部分处方的可能性相关。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Mar;31(2):155-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00803.x.
2
What adjustments, if any, do UK optometrists make to the subjective refraction result prior to prescribing?英国验光师在开具配镜处方之前,是否会对主观验光结果进行任何调整?
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 May;30(3):225-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00715.x.
3
Evaluation of the clinical maxim: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".对临床格言“如果没坏,就别修它”的评估。
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jan;89(1):105-11. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31823b0073.
4
Cycloplegia and spectacle prescribing in children: attitudes of UK optometrists.儿童睫状肌麻痹和配镜处方:英国验光师的态度。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 May;39(3):148-161. doi: 10.1111/opo.12612. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
5
A survey of the criteria for prescribing in cases of borderline refractive errors.临界屈光不正病例的处方标准调查。
J Optom. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.09.002.
6
Prescribing for hyperopia in childhood and teenage by academic optometrists.验光师为儿童及青少年远视患者开处方。
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Nov;88(11):1333-42. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31822f4b9c.
7
Spectacle prescribing in childhood: a survey of hospital optometrists.儿童配镜:一项针对医院验光师的调查。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;92(3):392-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.123497. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
8
Investigation of current guidelines for prescribing spectacles to children using a modified Delphi approach and the AGREE II tool.采用改良 Delphi 法和 AGREE II 工具调查为儿童配镜的现行指南。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Sep;44(6):1162-1187. doi: 10.1111/opo.13358. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
9
To prescribe or not to prescribe? Guidelines for spectacle prescribing in infants and children.开处方还是不开处方?婴幼儿配镜指南。
Clin Exp Optom. 2011 Nov;94(6):514-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00600.x. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
10
Modifications made to the refractive result when prescribing spectacles.配镜时对屈光结果所做的调整。
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Feb;89(2):155-60. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31823efdfd.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjective refraction and prescribing styles used by UK optometrists.英国验光师使用的主观验光和配镜处方方式。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Jul;45(5):1113-1125. doi: 10.1111/opo.13495. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Auto-refraction versus subjective refraction in different phakic and pseudophakic conditions: the Tehran Geriatric Eye Study (TGES).不同晶状体状态下自动验光与主观验光的比较:德黑兰老年眼病研究(TGES)
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 18;16(8):1309-1316. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.08.18. eCollection 2023.
3
Ophthalmology Provider Ratings and Patient, Disease, and Appointment Factors.
眼科医疗服务提供者评级以及患者、疾病和预约因素。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 9;8:23743735211033750. doi: 10.1177/23743735211033750. eCollection 2021.
4
Effects of induced astigmatism on foot placement strategies when stepping onto a raised surface.诱导性散光对踏上凸起表面时脚步放置策略的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063351. Print 2013.