• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项口腔健康干预措施对澳大利亚农村地区3岁以下学龄前儿童的影响。

Impact of an oral health intervention on pre-school children < 3 years of age in a rural setting in Australia.

作者信息

Neumann Ana S, Lee Katherine J, Gussy Mark G, Waters Elizabeth B, Carlin John B, Riggs Elisha, Kilpatrick Nicky M

机构信息

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Jun;47(6):367-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01988.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01988.x
PMID:21309883
Abstract

AIM

Australian pre-school children living in rural areas experience higher levels of dental caries than those in metropolitan areas. This may be because of a lack of community water fluoridation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based intervention to improve the oral health of children in non-fluoridated rural Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

The study was conducted across three local government areas in Victoria, with two receiving the intervention and one remaining with standard care. Although multifaceted, the primary strategy of the intervention was the promotion of early exposure to fluoridated toothpaste, including the distribution, by maternal and child health nurses (MCHNs), of an oral health starter kit including toothpaste, toothbrush and information to parents at their child's 7-8-month health check. Children were followed up annually to the age of three.

RESULTS

Infants in the intervention arm experienced less caries (cavitated and pre-cavitated lesions included) than infants in the control arm at the first and second examinations (3.1% with caries in the intervention vs. 6.9% in the control group at exam 1 (adjusted P= 0.07) and 10.8% vs. 19.5% at exam 2 (adjusted P= 0.11), respectively). However potential benefits disappeared at the third examination (29.5% vs. 28.9%, adjusted P= 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that an oral health promotion intervention delivered via local MCHNs promoting early exposure to fluoride may be successful in reducing caries in the second year of life but less so in older children when participants have less contact with MCHNs.

摘要

目的

生活在澳大利亚农村地区的学龄前儿童患龋齿的比例高于大城市地区的儿童。这可能是由于缺乏社区水氟化措施。本研究的目的是评估一项基于社区的干预措施对改善澳大利亚维多利亚州非氟化农村地区儿童口腔健康的有效性。

方法

该研究在维多利亚州的三个地方政府区域进行,其中两个区域接受干预,一个区域维持标准护理。尽管干预措施是多方面的,但其主要策略是促进儿童尽早接触含氟牙膏,包括由母婴健康护士(MCHNs)在儿童7 - 8个月健康检查时向家长分发包含牙膏、牙刷和信息的口腔健康入门套装。对儿童进行年度随访直至3岁。

结果

在第一次和第二次检查时,干预组的婴儿患龋齿(包括龋洞和前期龋损)的情况少于对照组婴儿(第一次检查时,干预组患龋率为3.1%,对照组为6.9%(调整后P = 0.07);第二次检查时,分别为10.8%和19.5%(调整后P = 0.11))。然而,在第三次检查时,潜在益处消失(29.5%对28.9%,调整后P = 0.67)。

结论

本研究表明,通过当地母婴健康护士实施的促进儿童尽早接触氟化物的口腔健康促进干预措施,可能在降低儿童出生后第二年的龋齿发病率方面取得成功,但在儿童年龄稍大、与母婴健康护士接触较少时效果较差。

相似文献

1
Impact of an oral health intervention on pre-school children < 3 years of age in a rural setting in Australia.一项口腔健康干预措施对澳大利亚农村地区3岁以下学龄前儿童的影响。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Jun;47(6):367-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01988.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
2
Challenges associated with the evaluation of a dental health promotion programme in a deprived urban area.在贫困城市地区评估牙齿健康促进项目所面临的挑战。
Community Dent Health. 2007 Jun;24(2):117-21.
3
Parental knowledge, beliefs and behaviours for oral health of toddlers residing in rural Victoria.维多利亚州农村地区幼儿家长关于口腔健康的知识、观念和行为
Aust Dent J. 2008 Mar;53(1):52-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00010.x.
4
A staged intervention dental health promotion programme to reduce early childhood caries.一项旨在减少幼儿龋齿的分阶段干预口腔健康促进计划。
Community Dent Health. 2005 Jun;22(2):118-22.
5
Oral health comparisons between children attending an Aboriginal health service and a Government school dental service in a regional location.在某地区,接受原住民健康服务的儿童与接受政府学校牙科服务的儿童口腔健康状况比较。
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Apr-Jun;7(2):625. Epub 2007 May 2.
6
Relationship between area deprivation and the anticaries benefit of an oral health programme providing free fluoride toothpaste to young children.地区贫困状况与一项为幼儿提供免费含氟牙膏的口腔健康项目的防龋效益之间的关系。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;32(3):159-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00150.x.
7
Dental caries of refugee children compared with US children.难民儿童与美国儿童的龋齿情况比较。
Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):e733-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0496.
8
The process and outcome of a programme for preventing early childhood caries in Thailand.泰国预防幼儿龋齿项目的过程与成果。
Community Dent Health. 2005 Dec;22(4):253-9.
9
The evaluation of a multi-level oral health intervention to improve oral health practices among caregivers of preschool children.一项旨在改善学龄前儿童照料者口腔健康行为的多层次口腔健康干预措施的评估。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012 Mar;43(2):526-39.
10
Glasgow nursery-based caries experience, before and after a community development-based oral health programme's implementation.在一项基于社区发展的口腔健康项目实施前后,格拉斯哥托儿所儿童的龋齿患病情况。
Community Dent Health. 2004 Dec;21(4):291-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Oral Health Interventions for Children Living in Vulnerable Circumstances - A Scoping Review.针对生活在弱势环境中的儿童的成功口腔健康干预措施——一项范围综述
Int Dent J. 2025 Aug;75(4):100855. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100855. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Current knowledge about early childhood caries in the gulf cooperation council with worldwide reflection: Scoping review of the scientific literature (2010-2021).海湾合作委员会关于幼儿龋齿的当前知识及全球影响:科学文献的范围综述(2010 - 2021年)
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;3(1):e0001228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001228. eCollection 2023.
3
The effectiveness of behaviour change interventions delivered by non-dental health workers in promoting children's oral health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
非口腔卫生工作者实施的行为改变干预措施对促进儿童口腔健康的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262118. eCollection 2022.
4
Early Childhood Caries in Victorian Preschoolers: A Cross-Sectional Study.维多利亚时代学龄前儿童的幼儿龋病:一项横断面研究。
Int Dent J. 2022 Jun;72(3):381-391. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
5
The relationship of primary care providers to dental practitioners in rural and remote Australia.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区基层医疗服务提供者与牙科从业者的关系。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2473-z.
6
Clinical efficacy of a two-year oral health programme for infants and toddlers in Singapore.新加坡一项针对婴幼儿的为期两年的口腔健康项目的临床疗效。
Singapore Med J. 2018 Feb;59(2):87-93. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017045. Epub 2017 May 25.
7
Integrating Maternal and Children's Oral Health Promotion into Nursing and Midwifery Practice- A Systematic Review.将孕产妇和儿童口腔健康促进纳入护理及助产实践——一项系统综述
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):e0166760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166760. eCollection 2016.
8
The early childhood oral health program: a qualitative study of the perceptions of child and family health nurses in South Western Sydney, Australia.幼儿口腔健康项目:对澳大利亚悉尼西南部儿童及家庭健康护士认知的定性研究
BMC Oral Health. 2016 May 16;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0213-0.
9
Non-dental primary care providers' views on challenges in providing oral health services and strategies to improve oral health in Australian rural and remote communities: a qualitative study.非牙科初级保健提供者对澳大利亚农村和偏远社区提供口腔健康服务的挑战及改善口腔健康策略的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 29;5(10):e009341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009341.
10
Teeth Tales: a community-based child oral health promotion trial with migrant families in Australia.牙齿故事:澳大利亚一项针对移民家庭的社区儿童口腔健康促进试验
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 11;5(6):e007321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007321.