Suppr超能文献

非口腔卫生工作者实施的行为改变干预措施对促进儿童口腔健康的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of behaviour change interventions delivered by non-dental health workers in promoting children's oral health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Department of Oral Medicine, Margalla Institute of Health Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262118. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Dental caries is the most common preventable childhood condition. Non-dental professionals and health workers are often well placed to support parents in adopting positive oral health behaviours for their children. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions and their individual component behaviour change techniques (BCTs), that were delivered by non-dental professionals and health workers.

METHODS

A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, TRoPHI and PROQUEST from inception until March 2021 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies for improving oral health outcomes in children were included. Quality assessment was carried out using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and ROBINS-I tool. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's regression intercept. Effect sizes were estimated as standardised mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio/risk ratio for proportions. Meta-analyses were performed for studies reporting mean decayed, missing, filled surfaces (dmfs) and mean decayed, missing, filled, teeth (dmft) indices. Behaviour change technique coding was performed using behaviour change technique taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1).

RESULTS

Out of the 9,101 records retrieved, 36 studies were included with 28 showing a significant effect either in clinical and/or behavioural/knowledge outcomes. Most studies (n = 21) were of poor methodological quality. The pooled SMD for caries experience showed statistically significant result for caries prevention at surface level -0.15 (95% CI -0.25, -0.04) and at the tooth level -0.24 (95% CI -0.42, -0.07). In 28 effective interventions, 27 individual BCTs were identified and the most frequently used were: "Instructions on how to perform the behaviour" and "Information about health consequences".

CONCLUSION

There is low quality of evidence suggesting non-dental professionals and health workers may help improve oral health outcomes for children. To confirm these findings, further high-quality studies incorporating a variety of BCTs in their interventions for adoption of good oral health behaviours are needed.

摘要

目的

龋齿是最常见的可预防的儿童疾病。非牙科专业人员和卫生工作者通常能够很好地支持家长为孩子养成积极的口腔健康行为。本研究旨在确定由非牙科专业人员和卫生工作者提供的行为改变干预措施及其单个组成部分行为改变技术(BCT)的有效性。

方法

对 Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、TRoPHI 和 PROQUEST 进行了系统检索,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 3 月。纳入了改善儿童口腔健康结局的随机对照试验和准实验研究。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 ROBINS-I 工具进行质量评估。使用漏斗图和 Egger 回归截距评估发表偏倚。对于报告平均龋齿、缺失、补牙表面(dmfs)和平均龋齿、缺失、补牙、牙齿(dmft)指数的研究,估计了效应大小作为标准化均数差(SMD)和比例的优势比/风险比。对报告表面水平龋齿预防的有统计学意义的结果 -0.15(95%CI -0.25,-0.04)和牙齿水平龋齿预防的有统计学意义的结果 -0.24(95%CI -0.42,-0.07)的 28 项研究进行了荟萃分析。

结果

从 9101 条记录中检索到 36 项研究,其中 28 项研究在临床和/或行为/知识结果方面显示出显著效果。大多数研究(n=21)的方法学质量较差。龋齿经验的汇总 SMD 显示,在表面水平龋齿预防方面有统计学意义的结果 -0.15(95%CI -0.25,-0.04),在牙齿水平龋齿预防方面有统计学意义的结果 -0.24(95%CI -0.42,-0.07)。在 28 项有效干预措施中,确定了 27 个单独的 BCT,最常用的是:“关于如何执行行为的指导”和“关于健康后果的信息”。

结论

证据质量低,表明非牙科专业人员和卫生工作者可能有助于改善儿童的口腔健康结局。为了证实这些发现,需要进一步开展高质量的研究,在干预措施中纳入各种 BCT,以促进良好的口腔健康行为的采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb8b/8751985/54ee77410463/pone.0262118.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验