Heinen Stephen J, Jin Zhenlan, Watamaniuk Scott N J
The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
J Vis. 2011 Feb 10;11(2):9. doi: 10.1167/11.2.9.
Smooth pursuit of natural objects requires flexible allocation of attention to inspect features. However, it has been reported that attention is focused at the fovea during pursuit. We ask here if foveal attention is obligatory during pursuit, or if it can be disengaged. Observers tracked a stimulus composed of a central dot surrounded by four others and identified one of the dots when it dimmed. Extinguishing the center dot before the dimming improved task performance, suggesting that attention was released from it. To determine if the center dot automatically usurped attention, we provided the pursuit system with an alternative sensory signal by adding peripheral motion that moved with the stimulus. This also improved identification performance, evidence that a central target does not necessarily require attention during pursuit. Identification performance at the central dot also improved, suggesting that the spatial extent of the background did not attract attention to the periphery; instead, peripheral motion freed pursuit attention from the central dot, affording better identification performance. The results show that attention can be flexibly allocated during pursuit and imply that attention resources for pursuit of small and large objects come from different sources.
对自然物体的平稳追踪需要灵活分配注意力以检查特征。然而,据报道在追踪过程中注意力集中在中央凹。我们在此询问,在追踪过程中中央凹注意力是否是强制性的,或者它是否可以脱离。观察者追踪一个由一个中央点和周围四个点组成的刺激物,并在其中一个点变暗时识别它。在变暗之前熄灭中央点提高了任务表现,这表明注意力从该点释放。为了确定中央点是否自动占据注意力,我们通过添加与刺激物一起移动的周边运动为追踪系统提供了另一种感觉信号。这也提高了识别表现,证明在追踪过程中中央目标不一定需要注意力。中央点的识别表现也有所提高,这表明背景的空间范围并没有将注意力吸引到周边;相反,周边运动将追踪注意力从中央点解放出来,从而提供了更好的识别表现。结果表明,在追踪过程中注意力可以灵活分配,这意味着追踪小物体和大物体的注意力资源来自不同的来源。