• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用长桡动脉导管测量体外循环后的动脉压。

Measurement of arterial pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass with long radial artery catheters.

作者信息

Rulf E N, Mitchell M M, Prakash O, Rijsterborg H, Cruz E, Deryck Y L, Rating W, Schepp R M, Siphanto K, Van der Woerd A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Dijkzigt, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990 Feb;4(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90441-h.

DOI:10.1016/0888-6296(90)90441-h
PMID:2131850
Abstract

Radial arterial pressure can significantly underestimate central aortic pressure in the postcardiopulmonary bypass (post-CPB) period. At the study institution, routine monitoring of perioperative arterial pressure in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery is performed with a long radial artery catheter with the distal end positioned in the subclavian artery. In 68 patients presenting for elective cardiac surgery, both a conventional short radial artery catheter and a contralateral long radial artery catheter were placed. Analysis of radial and subclavian arterial pressures post-CPB in the first 47 patients showed average maximum differences of 7 mm Hg systolic and 4 mm Hg mean. In 15% of patients, the differences were clinically significant (greater than 20 mm Hg systolic and/or greater than 14 mm Hg mean). In 28 patients, central aortic pressure was measured post-CPB, and subclavian artery pressure was found to be an excellent estimator of central aortic pressure. There were no significant complications related to using long radial artery catheters in the 68 patients who were followed prospectively. Monitoring subclavian arterial pressure by percutaneous insertion of a long radial artery catheter provides a reliable estimation of central aortic pressure, even in patients with significant radial artery-to-central aortic pressure gradients post-CPB.

摘要

在体外循环(CPB)后阶段,桡动脉压可能会显著低估中心主动脉压。在本研究机构,对于接受心脏手术的成年患者,围手术期动脉压的常规监测是通过将远端置于锁骨下动脉的长桡动脉导管进行的。在68例择期心脏手术患者中,同时放置了一根传统的短桡动脉导管和对侧的长桡动脉导管。对前47例患者CPB后的桡动脉和锁骨下动脉压进行分析,结果显示收缩压平均最大差值为7 mmHg,平均压平均最大差值为4 mmHg。在15%的患者中,这些差值具有临床意义(收缩压大于20 mmHg和/或平均压大于14 mmHg)。在28例患者中,CPB后测量了中心主动脉压,发现锁骨下动脉压是中心主动脉压的良好估计指标。在对68例患者进行前瞻性随访的过程中,使用长桡动脉导管未出现明显并发症。通过经皮插入长桡动脉导管监测锁骨下动脉压,即使在CPB后桡动脉与中心主动脉压存在显著梯度的患者中,也能可靠地估计中心主动脉压。

相似文献

1
Measurement of arterial pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass with long radial artery catheters.使用长桡动脉导管测量体外循环后的动脉压。
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990 Feb;4(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90441-h.
2
Comparison of axillary artery or brachial artery pressure with aortic pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass using a long radial artery catheter.使用长桡动脉导管在体外循环后比较腋动脉或肱动脉压力与主动脉压力。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Jun;7(3):312-5. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90011-9.
3
A comparison of radial, brachial, and aortic pressures after cardiopulmonary bypass.体外循环后桡动脉、肱动脉和主动脉压力的比较。
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1989 Feb;3(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(89)90006-9.
4
Comparison of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion on the postcardiopulmonary bypass aortic-radial artery pressure gradient.体外循环后主动脉-桡动脉压力梯度下搏动性灌注与非搏动性灌注的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997 Jun;11(4):428-31. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90049-5.
5
Blood pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass: which technique is accurate?体外循环后的血压:哪种技术准确?
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994 Jun;8(3):269-72. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(94)90236-4.
6
Systolic pressure measurement in the ascending aorta: augmentation at the aortic cannula sideport.升主动脉收缩压测量:主动脉插管侧孔处的压力增强。
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990 Feb;4(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90442-i.
7
Non-invasive estimates of aortic root pressures: external subclavian arterial pulse tracing calibrated by oscillometrically determined brachial arterial pressures.主动脉根部压力的无创估计:通过示波法测定的肱动脉压力校准的锁骨下动脉外部脉搏描记法。
Clin Physiol. 1993 Nov;13(6):573-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1993.tb00473.x.
8
Comparison of brachial and radial arterial pressure monitoring in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者肱动脉与桡动脉血压监测的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1990 Jul;73(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199007000-00007.
9
Hemodynamic Monitoring In The Cardiac Surgical Patient: Comparison of Three Arterial Catheters.心脏外科患者的血流动力学监测:三种动脉导管的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 May;38(5):1115-1126. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
Reliability of the radial arterial pressure during anesthesia. Is wrist compression a possible diagnostic test?麻醉期间桡动脉压的可靠性。腕部压迫是否可作为一种诊断测试?
Chest. 1994 Jan;105(1):69-75. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.69.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive detection of a femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient in intensive care patients with vasoactive agents.在使用血管活性药物的重症监护患者中无创检测股动脉至桡动脉的压力梯度
J Intensive Care. 2021 Nov 27;9(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00585-1.
2
Late evaluation of upper limb arterial flow in patients after long radial (PiCCO™) catheter placement.经皮穿刺插入长桡动脉导管(PiCCO™)患者上肢动脉血流的延迟评估。
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Jan 16;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s13613-014-0041-9. eCollection 2015.
3
Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine.
临床综述:麻醉与重症监护医学中用于血流动力学监测的外周动脉导管的并发症及危险因素
Crit Care. 2002 Jun;6(3):199-204. doi: 10.1186/cc1489. Epub 2002 Apr 18.