Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉搭桥手术患者肱动脉与桡动脉血压监测的比较。

Comparison of brachial and radial arterial pressure monitoring in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

作者信息

Bazaral M G, Welch M, Golding L A, Badhwar K

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44106.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1990 Jul;73(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199007000-00007.

Abstract

The pressure in either the radial (n = 88) or proximal brachial artery (n = 82) was compared with aortic pressure before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafts. Radial artery pressures were measured via 20-G 5-cm long catheters, brachial artery pressures via 20-G 12.7-cm catheters, and aortic pressures were measured via a luer port in the aortic perfusion cannula. Transducers were connected via 122-cm long tubing. For the various systems, mean natural frequencies were 16.1 to 17.7 Hz and damping coefficients were 0.16 to 0.27. Before CPB the brachial systolic, diastolic, and mean pressures were 108.2 +/- 5.2%, 100.9 +/- 2.8%, and 99.6 +/- 2.3% of aortic; respective radial pressures were 113.9 +/- 9.6%, 99.5 +/- 2.8%, and 98.4 +/- 2.8% of aortic. Immediately after CPB the brachial pressures were 99.5 +/- 7.5%, 98.9 +/- 3.5%, and 97.4 +/- 2.9% of aortic, whereas respective radial pressures were 92.1 +/- 14.6%, 94.7 +/- 5.6%, and 90.8 +/- 7.4%. All brachial and radial as a per cent of aortic pressure medians were significantly different, and except for prebypass diastolic and mean, the variance for brachial pressures was significantly less than that for pressures in the radial artery. The prebypass brachial correlation (r) with aortic for systolic, diastolic, and mean were 0.90, 0.98, and 0.98; respective radial correlations with aortic were 0.78, 0.97, and 0.95. Postbypass brachial systolic, diastolic, and mean correlations were 0.91, 0.97, and 0.98; radial were 0.50, 0.93, and 0.83. Brachial artery pressures were more accurate and reliable than radial artery pressures.

摘要

在接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者中,比较了体外循环(CPB)前后桡动脉(n = 88)或肱动脉近端(n = 82)的压力与主动脉压力。桡动脉压力通过20G 5厘米长的导管测量,肱动脉压力通过20G 12.7厘米的导管测量,主动脉压力通过主动脉灌注插管上的鲁尔端口测量。传感器通过122厘米长的管道连接。对于各种系统,平均固有频率为16.1至17.7赫兹,阻尼系数为0.16至0.27。CPB前,肱动脉收缩压、舒张压和平均压分别为主动脉的108.2±5.2%、100.9±2.8%和99.6±2.3%;桡动脉相应压力分别为主动脉的113.9±9.6%、99.5±2.8%和98.4±2.8%。CPB后即刻,肱动脉压力分别为主动脉的99.5±7.5%、98.9±3.5%和97.4±2.9%,而桡动脉相应压力分别为92.1±14.6%、94.7±5.6%和90.8±7.4%。所有肱动脉和桡动脉压力作为主动脉压力百分比的中位数均有显著差异,除了体外循环前的舒张压和平均压外,肱动脉压力的方差显著小于桡动脉压力的方差。体外循环前肱动脉收缩压、舒张压和平均压与主动脉的相关性(r)分别为0.90、0.98和0.98;桡动脉与主动脉的相应相关性分别为0.78、0.97和0.95。体外循环后肱动脉收缩压、舒张压和平均压的相关性分别为0.91、0.97和0.98;桡动脉的相关性分别为0.50、0.93和0.83。肱动脉压力比桡动脉压力更准确、可靠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验