• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用长桡动脉导管在体外循环后比较腋动脉或肱动脉压力与主动脉压力。

Comparison of axillary artery or brachial artery pressure with aortic pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass using a long radial artery catheter.

作者信息

VanBeck J O, White R D, Abenstein J P, Mullany C J, Orszulak T A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Jun;7(3):312-5. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90011-9.

DOI:10.1016/1053-0770(93)90011-9
PMID:8518378
Abstract

Arterial pressure measured in a peripheral artery may significantly underestimate central arterial pressure after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Arterial pressure measured with a 50 cm radial artery catheter advanced into the brachial or axillary artery was compared to ascending aortic pressure in 31 patients before and after discontinuation of CPB. The radial artery catheter extended proximally into the brachial artery in 8/31 patients, and into the axillary artery in 23/31 patients. The patient's age, pre-CPB cardiac ejection fraction, and surgical procedures were similar in both groups. The systolic arterial pressure measured in the ascending aorta was found to be significantly different from that in the axillary artery after CPB, whereas the mean and diastolic pressures were not. The average aorta-to-axillary artery systolic pressure gradient was -3.0 +/- 4.0 mmHg, with no patient having a gradient greater than 10 mmHg. The systolic and mean arterial pressures measured in the ascending aorta were found to be significantly different from that in the brachial artery after discontinuation of CPB, whereas the diastolic pressure was not. The average aorta-to-brachial artery systolic pressure gradient was 6.9 +/- 6.9 mmHg, with 3/8 patients having a gradient greater than 10 mmHg. Long radial artery catheters, placed using the Seldinger technique, provide an accurate estimate of central aortic pressure after CPB when they are advanced into the axillary artery. Sites more distal than the axillary artery may result in significant underestimation of the central aortic pressure in these patients.

摘要

在体外循环(CPB)停止后,在外周动脉测量的动脉压可能会显著低估中心动脉压。在31例患者CPB停止前后,将一根50 cm长的桡动脉导管推进至肱动脉或腋动脉所测量的动脉压与升主动脉压进行比较。在31例患者中,8例患者的桡动脉导管近端延伸至肱动脉,23例患者的桡动脉导管近端延伸至腋动脉。两组患者的年龄、CPB前心脏射血分数和手术操作相似。发现CPB后升主动脉测量的收缩压与腋动脉测量的收缩压有显著差异,而平均压和舒张压无显著差异。主动脉至腋动脉的平均收缩压梯度为-3.0±4.0 mmHg,没有患者的梯度大于10 mmHg。发现CPB停止后升主动脉测量的收缩压和平均动脉压与肱动脉测量的收缩压和平均动脉压有显著差异,而舒张压无显著差异。主动脉至肱动脉的平均收缩压梯度为6.9±6.9 mmHg,8例患者中有3例的梯度大于10 mmHg。使用Seldinger技术放置的长桡动脉导管,当推进至腋动脉时,可在CPB后提供对中心主动脉压的准确估计。比腋动脉更远端的部位可能会导致这些患者的中心主动脉压被显著低估。

相似文献

1
Comparison of axillary artery or brachial artery pressure with aortic pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass using a long radial artery catheter.使用长桡动脉导管在体外循环后比较腋动脉或肱动脉压力与主动脉压力。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Jun;7(3):312-5. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90011-9.
2
A comparison of radial, brachial, and aortic pressures after cardiopulmonary bypass.体外循环后桡动脉、肱动脉和主动脉压力的比较。
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1989 Feb;3(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(89)90006-9.
3
Measurement of arterial pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass with long radial artery catheters.使用长桡动脉导管测量体外循环后的动脉压。
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990 Feb;4(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90441-h.
4
Blood pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass: which technique is accurate?体外循环后的血压:哪种技术准确?
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994 Jun;8(3):269-72. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(94)90236-4.
5
Comparison of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion on the postcardiopulmonary bypass aortic-radial artery pressure gradient.体外循环后主动脉-桡动脉压力梯度下搏动性灌注与非搏动性灌注的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997 Jun;11(4):428-31. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90049-5.
6
Comparison of brachial and radial arterial pressure monitoring in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者肱动脉与桡动脉血压监测的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1990 Jul;73(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199007000-00007.
7
Central-to-peripheral arterial pressure gradient during cardiopulmonary bypass: relation to pre- and intra-operative data and effects of vasoactive agents.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994 Jul;38(5):479-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb03933.x.
8
A comparison of brachial, femoral, and aortic intra-arterial pressures before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1989 Aug;17(3):305-11. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8901700311.
9
Radial artery-to-aorta pressure difference after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass.体外循环停止后桡动脉与主动脉的压差。
Anesthesiology. 1989 Jun;70(6):935-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198906000-00009.
10
Hemodynamic Monitoring In The Cardiac Surgical Patient: Comparison of Three Arterial Catheters.心脏外科患者的血流动力学监测:三种动脉导管的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 May;38(5):1115-1126. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive detection of a femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient in intensive care patients with vasoactive agents.在使用血管活性药物的重症监护患者中无创检测股动脉至桡动脉的压力梯度
J Intensive Care. 2021 Nov 27;9(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00585-1.
2
Practical Suitability of a Stand-Alone Oscillometric Central Blood Pressure Monitor: A Review of the Microlife WatchBP Office Central.独立式示波法中心血压监测仪的实际适用性:Microlife WatchBP Office Central的综述
Pulse (Basel). 2016 Apr;3(3-4):205-16. doi: 10.1159/000443771. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
Peripheral arterial blood pressure monitoring adequately tracks central arterial blood pressure in critically ill patients: an observational study.
外周动脉血压监测能够充分反映危重症患者的中心动脉血压:一项观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R43. doi: 10.1186/cc4852.