• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

归因过程的实验修正。

Experimental modification of attribution processes.

机构信息

Tulane University and Southeast Louisiana Veterans HealthCare System.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):168-73. doi: 10.1037/a0021899.

DOI:10.1037/a0021899
PMID:21319929
Abstract

Attributional style is hypothesized to be a causative factor in depression vulnerability; however, no studies to date have examined whether manipulation of attributional style influences depressed mood. The purpose of this study was to determine whether computer-based cognitive bias modification (CBM) procedures could modify attributional style and influence stress vulnerability. Participants were provided with multiple training trials that were intended to promote the use of either a positive or a negative attributional style. Compared with individuals in the negative attributional style condition, individuals in the positive attributional style condition showed decreased tendency to make self-deficient causal attributions for poor performance on a difficult anagram test. Furthermore, individuals in the positive attributional style condition reported less depressed mood in response to this academic stressor. These results suggest that attributional style is not invariable and can potentially be modified with CBM approaches.

摘要

归因风格被假设为抑郁易感性的一个原因;然而,迄今为止尚无研究检验归因风格的改变是否会影响抑郁情绪。本研究的目的是确定基于计算机的认知偏差修正(CBM)程序是否可以改变归因风格并影响压力易感性。参与者接受了多次训练试验,旨在促进使用积极或消极的归因风格。与消极归因风格条件下的个体相比,积极归因风格条件下的个体在困难的字谜测试中表现不佳时,做出自我缺陷性因果归因的倾向降低。此外,积极归因风格条件下的个体在应对这种学术压力源时报告的抑郁情绪较少。这些结果表明,归因风格不是不变的,并且可以通过 CBM 方法进行潜在的改变。

相似文献

1
Experimental modification of attribution processes.归因过程的实验修正。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):168-73. doi: 10.1037/a0021899.
2
Attributional style in the eating disorders.饮食失调中的归因风格。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Apr;194(4):303-5. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000208114.79179.7e.
3
The relationship of attributional style to agoraphobia severity, depression, and treatment outcome.
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Dec;35(12):1061-73.
4
Attributional style in psychosis--the role of affect and belief type.精神病中的归因风格——情感与信念类型的作用
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Nov;44(11):1597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
5
Attributional intervention for depression in two people with multiple sclerosis (MS): single case design.归因干预对多发性硬化症 (MS) 两人的抑郁:单病例设计。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2011 Jan;39(1):115-21. doi: 10.1017/S1352465810000536. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
6
[Comparative analysis of attributional style and self-esteem in a sample of depressed patients and normal control subjects].[抑郁症患者与正常对照样本中归因方式与自尊的比较分析]
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2004 Sep-Oct;32(5):259-63.
7
Attributions for sexual situations in men with and without erectile disorder: evidence from a sex-specific attributional style measure.患有和未患有勃起功能障碍男性对性情境的归因:来自特定性别的归因方式测量的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2004 Dec;33(6):559-69. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000044740.72588.08.
8
Enhancing attributional style as a resiliency factor in depressogenic stress generation.增强归因风格作为抑郁性应激产生的一个适应因素。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013;26(4):467-74. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2012.684381. Epub 2012 May 21.
9
The regulation of positive and negative emotions through instructed causal attributions in lifetime depression - A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.通过在一生中抑郁时的指令性因果归因来调节正性和负性情绪——一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Comparing visual and auditory presentation for the modification of interpretation bias.比较视觉和听觉呈现方式对解释偏差的修正作用。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;40(4):558-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Breaking the vise of hopelessness: Targeting its components, antecedents, and context.打破绝望的束缚:针对其构成要素、前因及背景。
Int J Cogn Ther. 2023 Sep;16(3):285-319. doi: 10.1007/s41811-023-00165-1. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
A systematic review with meta-analysis of cognitive bias modification interventions for anger and aggression.一项针对愤怒和攻击的认知偏差修正干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Aug;167:104344. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104344. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
Positive affect treatment targets reward sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial.
积极情绪治疗靶向奖励敏感性:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023 Jun;91(6):350-366. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000805. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
4
Can mild traumatic brain injury alter cognition chronically? A LIMBIC-CENC multicenter study.轻度创伤性脑损伤会慢性改变认知吗?一项 LIMBIC-CENC 多中心研究。
Neuropsychology. 2023 Jan;37(1):1-19. doi: 10.1037/neu0000855. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
5
Suicidal Behavior in the Mediterranean Countries.地中海国家的自杀行为。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2020 Jul 30;16(Suppl-1):93-100. doi: 10.2174/1745017902016010093. eCollection 2020.
6
Multisession Cognitive Bias Modification Targeting Multiple Biases in Adolescents with Elevated Social Anxiety.针对社交焦虑水平较高的青少年的多种认知偏差进行多阶段认知偏差修正。
Cognit Ther Res. 2018;42(5):581-597. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9912-y. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
7
Heart Rate Variability and Cognitive Bias Feedback Interventions to Prevent Post-deployment PTSD: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.心率变异性和认知偏差反馈干预预防部署后创伤后应激障碍:一项随机对照试验的结果
Mil Med. 2019 Jan 1;184(1-2):e124-e132. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy171.
8
The Hopelessness Theory of Depression: A Quarter Century in Review.抑郁的绝望理论:回顾二十五年
Clin Psychol (New York). 2015 Dec 1;22(4):345-365. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12125. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
9
How Disorder-Specific are Depressive Attributions? A Comparison of Individuals with Depression, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Healthy Controls.抑郁归因在多大程度上具有特定障碍性?抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍患者与健康对照者的比较。
Cognit Ther Res. 2012 Dec;36(6):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s10608-011-9429-0. Epub 2011 Dec 27.