• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

花生和坚果过敏的消费者如何利用包装上的信息来避免过敏原?

How do peanut and nut-allergic consumers use information on the packaging to avoid allergens?

机构信息

Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.

出版信息

Allergy. 2011 Jul;66(7):969-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02563.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02563.x
PMID:21320134
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent legislation has sought to improve the information printed on packaged foods relevant to the safety of food allergic consumers. We aimed to understand the complex risk assessment decisions made by peanut and nut-allergic adults when purchasing food, with particular reference to use of printed package information.

METHODS

The behaviour and 'thinking aloud' of 32 participants were recorded during their normal food shop, followed by a semi-structured interview. During the interview they were given 13 potentially problematic packaged foods, and asked if they would purchase the product and what their reasons were. Transcribed data from the shop, interview and 13-product task were analysed to explore use of allergy advice boxes, ingredients lists and other packaging information.

RESULTS

Some participants used the ingredients list as their primary check for allergens, but most used the allergy advice box. Package-based information was generally considered reliable, but some supermarket and brand labels were trusted more than others. Images and product names were used to draw inferences about the presence of nuts. A number of improvements were suggested by participants, particularly a request for more 'nut free' labelling.

CONCLUSIONS

Food labels were used in conjunction with nonpacket-based strategies (e.g. previous experience) to make choices. External factors (e.g. trust of manufacturer) informed interpretation of and confidence in labels. Images and product names, not intended by manufacturers as an allergen risk assessment aid, were also used to inform choices.

摘要

背景

最近的立法旨在改进包装食品上有关食物过敏消费者安全的信息。我们旨在了解花生和坚果过敏的成年人在购买食物时所做出的复杂风险评估决策,特别是参考使用印刷包装信息的情况。

方法

在正常的购物过程中记录了 32 名参与者的行为和“出声思维”,然后进行半结构化访谈。在访谈中,他们被提供了 13 种可能有问题的包装食品,并被问及他们是否会购买该产品以及原因是什么。从商店、访谈和 13 种产品任务中转录的数据被用于探索过敏建议框、成分列表和其他包装信息的使用。

结果

一些参与者将成分列表作为他们检查过敏原的主要依据,但大多数人使用过敏建议框。基于包装的信息通常被认为是可靠的,但一些超市和品牌标签比其他标签更受信任。图像和产品名称被用来推断是否存在坚果。参与者提出了一些改进建议,特别是要求更多的“无坚果”标签。

结论

食品标签与非包装策略(如以往经验)一起使用做出选择。外部因素(如制造商的信任)影响对标签的解释和信心。图像和产品名称,并非制造商有意作为过敏原风险评估辅助工具,也被用于做出选择。

相似文献

1
How do peanut and nut-allergic consumers use information on the packaging to avoid allergens?花生和坚果过敏的消费者如何利用包装上的信息来避免过敏原?
Allergy. 2011 Jul;66(7):969-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02563.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
2
Food-allergic consumers' labelling preferences: a cross-cultural comparison.食物过敏消费者的标签偏好:跨文化比较
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Apr;18(2):115-20. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm032. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
3
Survey of peanut levels in selected Irish food products bearing peanut allergen advisory labels.爱尔兰含花生过敏原警示标签的部分食品中花生含量的调查。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2013;30(9):1467-72. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2013.804953. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
4
Using 'may contain' labelling to inform food choice: a qualitative study of nut allergic consumers.使用“可能含有”标签来告知食品选择:坚果过敏消费者的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 26;11:734. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-734.
5
The challenges for nut-allergic consumers of eating out.外出就餐的坚果过敏消费者所面临的挑战。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Feb;41(2):243-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03649.x. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
6
Parents' attitudes when purchasing products for children with nut allergy: a UK perspective.英国视角下家长为坚果过敏儿童购买产品时的态度
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009 Aug;20(5):500-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00796.x. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
7
Consumer attitudes and risks associated with packaged foods having advisory labeling regarding the presence of peanuts.消费者对带有花生存在警示标签的包装食品的态度及相关风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jul;120(1):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
8
Peanut and hazelnut traces in cookies and chocolates: relationship between analytical results and declaration of food allergens on product labels.饼干和巧克力中的花生及榛子痕迹:分析结果与产品标签上食品过敏原声明之间的关系。
Food Addit Contam. 2007 Dec;24(12):1334-44. doi: 10.1080/02652030701458113.
9
Dietary management of peanut and tree nut allergy: what exactly should patients avoid?花生和树坚果过敏的饮食管理:患者究竟应该避免什么?
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 May;45(5):859-871. doi: 10.1111/cea.12466.
10
Functional analysis of cross-reactive immunoglobulin E antibodies: peanut-specific immunoglobulin E sensitizes basophils to tree nut allergens.交叉反应性免疫球蛋白E抗体的功能分析:花生特异性免疫球蛋白E使嗜碱性粒细胞对坚果过敏原敏感。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Aug;35(8):1056-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02310.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Food Allergies on the Food Safety and Life Quality of Adults in Spain.食物过敏对西班牙成年人食品安全和生活质量的影响。
Foods. 2025 Mar 10;14(6):939. doi: 10.3390/foods14060939.
2
Experiences and perceptions of people with celiac disease, food allergies and food intolerance when dining out.乳糜泻、食物过敏和食物不耐受患者外出就餐时的经历与看法。
Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 2;11:1321360. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1321360. eCollection 2024.
3
Low dietary adherence after a positive food challenge in food allergic adults.食物过敏成人食物激发试验呈阳性后饮食依从性较低。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2022 Feb;12(2):e12119. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12119.
4
hGLUTEN Tool: Measuring Its Social Impact Indicators.hGLUTEN 工具:衡量其社会影响指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;18(23):12722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312722.
5
The health implications of distrust in the food system: findings from the dimensions of trust in food systems scale (DOTIFS scale).食品体系不信任的健康影响:食品体系信任维度量表(DOTIFS 量表)的研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):1468. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11349-9.
6
Poor understanding of allergen labelling by allergic and non-allergic consumers.过敏和非过敏消费者对过敏原标签的理解较差。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Oct;51(10):1374-1382. doi: 10.1111/cea.13975. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
7
Allergen labelling: Current practice and improvement from a communication perspective.过敏原标识:从沟通视角看当前实践与改进。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Apr;51(4):574-584. doi: 10.1111/cea.13830. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
8
Non-Nutritive (Artificial) Sweetener Knowledge among University Students.非营养性(人工)甜味剂知识在大学生中的普及情况。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 12;11(9):2201. doi: 10.3390/nu11092201.
9
Comparing the eating out experiences of consumers seeking to avoid different food allergens.比较消费者外出就餐体验,这些消费者试图避免不同的食物过敏原。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):1263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6117-y.
10
Consumer-friendly food allergen detection: moving towards smartphone-based immunoassays.消费者友好型食物过敏原检测:迈向基于智能手机的免疫分析。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 Sep;410(22):5353-5371. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-0989-7. Epub 2018 Mar 26.