Suppr超能文献

花生和坚果过敏的消费者如何利用包装上的信息来避免过敏原?

How do peanut and nut-allergic consumers use information on the packaging to avoid allergens?

机构信息

Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.

出版信息

Allergy. 2011 Jul;66(7):969-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02563.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent legislation has sought to improve the information printed on packaged foods relevant to the safety of food allergic consumers. We aimed to understand the complex risk assessment decisions made by peanut and nut-allergic adults when purchasing food, with particular reference to use of printed package information.

METHODS

The behaviour and 'thinking aloud' of 32 participants were recorded during their normal food shop, followed by a semi-structured interview. During the interview they were given 13 potentially problematic packaged foods, and asked if they would purchase the product and what their reasons were. Transcribed data from the shop, interview and 13-product task were analysed to explore use of allergy advice boxes, ingredients lists and other packaging information.

RESULTS

Some participants used the ingredients list as their primary check for allergens, but most used the allergy advice box. Package-based information was generally considered reliable, but some supermarket and brand labels were trusted more than others. Images and product names were used to draw inferences about the presence of nuts. A number of improvements were suggested by participants, particularly a request for more 'nut free' labelling.

CONCLUSIONS

Food labels were used in conjunction with nonpacket-based strategies (e.g. previous experience) to make choices. External factors (e.g. trust of manufacturer) informed interpretation of and confidence in labels. Images and product names, not intended by manufacturers as an allergen risk assessment aid, were also used to inform choices.

摘要

背景

最近的立法旨在改进包装食品上有关食物过敏消费者安全的信息。我们旨在了解花生和坚果过敏的成年人在购买食物时所做出的复杂风险评估决策,特别是参考使用印刷包装信息的情况。

方法

在正常的购物过程中记录了 32 名参与者的行为和“出声思维”,然后进行半结构化访谈。在访谈中,他们被提供了 13 种可能有问题的包装食品,并被问及他们是否会购买该产品以及原因是什么。从商店、访谈和 13 种产品任务中转录的数据被用于探索过敏建议框、成分列表和其他包装信息的使用。

结果

一些参与者将成分列表作为他们检查过敏原的主要依据,但大多数人使用过敏建议框。基于包装的信息通常被认为是可靠的,但一些超市和品牌标签比其他标签更受信任。图像和产品名称被用来推断是否存在坚果。参与者提出了一些改进建议,特别是要求更多的“无坚果”标签。

结论

食品标签与非包装策略(如以往经验)一起使用做出选择。外部因素(如制造商的信任)影响对标签的解释和信心。图像和产品名称,并非制造商有意作为过敏原风险评估辅助工具,也被用于做出选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验