Suppr超能文献

大麻素类药物的双重神经保护-神经毒性特征。

The dual neuroprotective-neurotoxic profile of cannabinoid drugs.

机构信息

The Adelson Center for the Biology of Addictive Diseases and The Mauerberger Chair in Neuropharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;163(7):1391-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01280.x.

Abstract

Extensive in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that cannabinoid drugs have neuroprotective properties and suggested that the endocannabinoid system may be involved in endogenous neuroprotective mechanisms. On the other hand, neurotoxic effects of cannabinoids in vitro and in vivo were also described. Several possible explanations for these dual, opposite effects of cannabinoids on cellular fate were suggested, and it is conceivable that various factors may determine the final outcome of the cannabinoid effect in vivo. In the current review, we focus on one of the possible reasons for the dual neuroprotective/neurotoxic effects of cannabinoids in vivo, namely, the opposite effects of low versus high doses of cannabinoids. While many studies reported neuroprotective effects of the conventional doses of cannabinoids in various experimental models for acute brain injuries, we have shown that a single administration of an extremely low dose of Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (3-4 orders of magnitude lower than the conventional doses) to mice induced long-lasting mild cognitive deficits that affected various aspects of memory and learning. These findings led to the idea that this low dose of THC, which induces minor damage to the brain, may activate preconditioning and/or postconditioning mechanisms and thus will protect the brain from more severe insults. Indeed, our recent findings support this assumption and show that a pre- or a postconditioning treatment with extremely low doses of THC, several days before or after brain injury, provides effective long-term cognitive neuroprotection. The future therapeutical potential of these findings is discussed.

摘要

大量的体外和体内研究表明,大麻素类药物具有神经保护特性,并提示内源性大麻素系统可能参与内源性神经保护机制。另一方面,也描述了大麻素在体外和体内的神经毒性作用。对于大麻素对细胞命运的这种双重相反作用,提出了几种可能的解释,并且可以想象,各种因素可能决定大麻素在体内的最终作用结果。在当前的综述中,我们重点讨论了大麻素在体内产生双重神经保护/神经毒性作用的一种可能原因,即低剂量与高剂量大麻素的相反作用。虽然许多研究报告了大麻素在各种急性脑损伤的实验模型中的神经保护作用,但我们已经表明,单次给予极低剂量的 Δ(9)-四氢大麻酚(THC)(比常规剂量低 3-4 个数量级)可诱导小鼠产生持久的轻度认知缺陷,从而影响记忆和学习的各个方面。这些发现导致了这样一种想法,即这种低剂量的 THC 会对大脑造成轻微损伤,可能会激活预处理和/或后处理机制,从而保护大脑免受更严重的损伤。事实上,我们最近的研究结果支持了这一假设,并表明在脑损伤前或后几天用极低剂量的 THC 进行预处理或后处理,可以提供有效的长期认知神经保护。讨论了这些发现的未来治疗潜力。

相似文献

3
Cannabinoids: between neuroprotection and neurotoxicity.大麻素:介于神经保护与神经毒性之间
Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2005 Dec;4(6):677-84. doi: 10.2174/156800705774933005.
10
Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Brain Morphology: A Review of the Evidence.大麻、大麻素与大脑形态:证据回顾。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Jun;6(6):627-635. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

5
Marijuana's potential in neurodegenerative diseases: an editorial.大麻在神经退行性疾病中的潜力:一篇社论。
AIMS Neurosci. 2023 Jun 25;10(2):175-177. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023014. eCollection 2023.
10
Interaction of Cannabis Use and Aging: From Molecule to Mind.大麻使用与衰老的相互作用:从分子到大脑。
J Dual Diagn. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):140-176. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2019.1665218. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

7

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验