Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Intensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Apr;17(2):122-30. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283447948.
This review will consider the reasons why the inhibition of leucocyte recruitment after traumatic brain injury has not been demonstrated but should remain an area of active interest.
Focal lesions to the brain display a characteristic inflammatory response with infiltration of peripheral immune cells after injury. These cells are believed to be important because they contain and release a multitude of inflammatory mediators associated with increased tissue injury. Furthermore a large body of evidence from ischaemic injuries suggests that inhibition of leucocyte recruitment can reduce injury and improve outcome. However, therapeutic efficacy has not been demonstrated in clinical trials and for traumatic injuries the results are less convincing.
A greater appreciation of the timing of assessment, leucocyte subsets and the extended inflammatory response will be discussed.
本篇综述将探讨颅脑创伤后白细胞募集抑制作用未被证实的原因,但这仍应是一个活跃的研究领域。
脑局灶性病变在损伤后显示出特征性炎症反应,伴有外周免疫细胞浸润。这些细胞被认为很重要,因为它们包含并释放多种与组织损伤增加相关的炎症介质。此外,大量来自缺血性损伤的证据表明,白细胞募集的抑制作用可减轻损伤并改善预后。然而,临床试验并未证实其治疗效果,而对于颅脑创伤,结果则不那么令人信服。
本文将更深入地探讨评估时间、白细胞亚群和扩展炎症反应。