Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, IIA, Vairam Enclave, Pondicherry 605 006, India.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Apr;15(4):566-75. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1454-5. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
Pharyngoesophageal strictures due to corrosive injury raise difficult therapeutic problems due to the site of stricture, the possible association with laryngeal injury and the presence of downstream esophageal strictures. We present here our approach to management of 51 consecutive patients with pharyngoesophageal strictures seen over a 30-year period.
Patients (51) with PES were managed by one of several options depending on the individual case, viz. dilatation alone, dilatation followed by esophagocoloplasty, dilatation after cervical esophagostomy with or without an esophagocoloplasty, pectoralis major or sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap inlays with or without esophagocoloplasty, pharyngocoloplasty with tracheostomy, and neck exploration followed by esophagocoloplasty if a lumen was found in the cervical esophagus.
The overall results were excellent with satisfactory swallowing restored in 45 out 51 patients (88.2%). There was one death and three incidences of complications, two patients with temporary cervical salivary fistula, and one patient in whom swallowing could not be restored because of lack of suitable conduit. The mean dysphagia score was improved from a pre-operative value of 3.6 to 1.5 post-operatively.
In conclusion, pharyngoesophageal strictures require considerable expertise in management, and one should be aware of various options for this purpose. The choice of procedure depends on site of stricture, time of presentation after the corrosive injury, relationship of the stricture to the laryngeal inlet, status of the larynx and the airway, length of the stricture, presence or absence of a lumen distal to the stricture in the cervical esophagus, and presence or absence of strictures further downstream. With proper treatment, mortality is negligible and morbidity minimal and is usually restricted to temporary salivary fistula.
腐蚀性损伤引起的咽食管狭窄由于狭窄部位、可能与喉损伤的关系以及下游食管狭窄的存在,带来了困难的治疗问题。我们在此介绍我们在 30 年期间对 51 例咽食管狭窄患者的治疗方法。
根据具体情况,通过几种选择之一对患者(51 例)进行管理,即单独扩张、扩张后行食管胃吻合术、颈段食管造口术后扩张加或不加食管胃吻合术、胸大肌或胸锁乳突肌肌皮瓣镶嵌加或不加食管胃吻合术、咽食管成形术加气管造口术,以及颈段食管有腔隙时行颈段食管探查加食管胃吻合术。
51 例患者中,45 例(88.2%)总体疗效良好,吞咽功能恢复满意。有 1 例死亡,3 例发生并发症,2 例暂时性颈唾液瘘,1 例因缺乏合适的导管而无法恢复吞咽功能。术后平均吞咽困难评分从术前的 3.6 分改善至 1.5 分。
总之,咽食管狭窄的治疗需要相当的专业知识,应了解各种治疗选择。手术方式的选择取决于狭窄部位、腐蚀性损伤后的时间、狭窄与喉入口的关系、喉和气道的状态、狭窄的长度、颈段食管狭窄远端是否存在腔隙,以及下游是否存在狭窄。经过适当的治疗,死亡率可忽略不计,发病率最低,通常仅限于暂时性唾液瘘。