Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):900-907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5764-x. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Outcome of endoscopic dilatation in acid-induced corrosive esophageal stricture is less known. This study aims to determine the outcome of dilatation and predictors of failed dilatation in patients with acid-induced corrosive esophageal stricture. Patients diagnosed of corrosive esophageal strictures were included. Endoscopic dilatation with graded Savary-Gilliard dilator was performed as the first line treatment. Outcome of dilatation was considered favorable when patients were able to swallow solid without intervention at least six months after successful dilatation. Failure of dilatation was defined as one of the following; complete luminal stenosis, inability to perform safe dilatation, perforation, and inability to maintain adequate luminal patency. Surgery or repeated dilatation was indicated in failed dilatations. There were 55 patients with corrosive esophageal strictures. Of 55 patients, 41 (75%) had failed dilatation (38 having esophageal replacement procedure, two continue repeated dilatation and one unfit for surgery). Of 323 sessions of dilatations, eight out of 55 patients (14.5%) had perforations. There was no dilatation-related mortality. Patients with concomitant pharyngeal stricture (p = 0.0001), long (≥ 10 cm) stricture length (p < 0.0001), number of dilatation >6 sessions per year (p = 0.01) and refractory stricture (inability to pass a larger than 11 mm dilator within three sessions) (p = 0.01) were more likely to have failed dilatation. Thirty-two of 38 patients with surgery had good swallow outcome with one operative mortality (2.6%). At the median follow-up of 61 months, overall favorable outcome was 84% after surgery and 25% for dilatation (p < 0.0001). Majority of patients with acid-induced corrosive esophageal stricture were refractory to dilatation. Esophageal dilatations were ultimately failed in three-fourth of the patients. Concomitant cricopharyngeal stricture, long stricture length, requiring frequent dilatation, and refractory to >11 mm dilatation were factors associated with failed dilatation.
内镜扩张治疗酸诱导腐蚀性食管狭窄的效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定酸诱导腐蚀性食管狭窄患者扩张治疗的效果和扩张失败的预测因素。纳入诊断为腐蚀性食管狭窄的患者。首先采用分级 Savary-Gilliard 扩张器进行内镜扩张。如果患者在成功扩张后至少 6 个月无需干预即可吞咽固体,则认为扩张效果良好。扩张失败定义为以下之一:完全管腔狭窄、无法进行安全扩张、穿孔和无法维持足够的管腔通畅。失败的扩张需要手术或反复扩张。共有 55 例腐蚀性食管狭窄患者。55 例患者中,41 例(75%)扩张失败(38 例行食管替代术,2 例继续反复扩张,1 例不适合手术)。在 323 次扩张治疗中,55 例患者中有 8 例(14.5%)发生穿孔。无扩张相关死亡。伴发咽狭窄的患者(p=0.0001)、狭窄长度≥10cm(p<0.0001)、每年扩张次数>6 次(p=0.01)和难治性狭窄(在 3 次治疗内无法通过大于 11mm 的扩张器)(p=0.01)的患者更有可能扩张失败。38 例行手术的患者中有 32 例吞咽功能良好,1 例手术死亡(2.6%)。中位随访 61 个月时,手术的总体良好结局为 84%,扩张为 25%(p<0.0001)。大多数酸诱导腐蚀性食管狭窄患者对扩张治疗有抵抗性。四分之三的患者最终扩张失败。伴发环咽肌狭窄、狭窄长度较长、需要频繁扩张以及对>11mm 扩张器有抵抗性是扩张失败的相关因素。