Department of Psychology, State University of New York College at Oswego, 13126, Oswego, New York.
Mem Cognit. 1977 Jan;5(1):111-5. doi: 10.3758/BF03209201.
In contrast to the findings of Bransford and Franks (1971) that no specific information is retained about acquisition sentences in their recognition memory paradigm, it was shown that subjects can consistently distinguish OLDs from NEWs when visual presentation is used, but not when auditory presentation is used. This is in agreement with the speculation of Katz and Gruenewald (1974) as to why such a split was observed in their study. This difference also has a bearing on the typical finding of no modality effects in long-term memory, as compared to the consistent superiority of auditory presentation in short-term memory. It was also found that blocking semantically related sentences during acquisition heightened the perceived "OLDness" of test sentences compared to nonblocked presentation.
与 Bransford 和 Franks(1971)的发现相反,他们在识别记忆范式中发现,关于习得句子没有保留特定信息,研究表明,当使用视觉呈现时,受试者可以一致地区分 OLD 和 NEW,但当使用听觉呈现时则不能。这与 Katz 和 Gruenewald(1974)的推测一致,即为什么在他们的研究中观察到了这样的分裂。这种差异也与长期记忆中没有模态效应的典型发现有关,而在短期记忆中,听觉呈现的优势则是一致的。研究还发现,在习得过程中阻断语义相关的句子会使测试句子的“OLDness”感知增强,与非阻断呈现相比。