Department of Psychology, University of Florida, 32611, Gainesville, Florida.
Mem Cognit. 1977 Nov;5(6):685-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03197416.
The effects of type of recognition test procedure were studied in a Bransford and Franks (1971) integration paradigm. Subjects received a two-alternative forced-choice recognition test or a modified "forced-choice" test in which all the sentences for each idea set were presented at once and the "old" sentences had to be identified. Contrary to the usual Bransford and Franks results, in which a yes-no, one-sentence-at-a-time recognition procedure is employed, the ability to discriminate "old" sentences from "new" sentences was clearly observed. A bias for selecting more complex sentences, however, was found for the modified "forced-choice" procedure. A prototype learning model is described to account for these results and previous data.
在布兰斯福德和弗兰克斯(1971)的整合范式中,研究了识别测试程序类型的影响。受试者接受了二选一的强制选择识别测试或修改后的“强制选择”测试,其中每个思想集的所有句子一次呈现,并且必须识别“旧”句子。与通常的布兰斯福德和弗兰克斯结果相反,在该结果中采用了是与否,一次一个句子的识别程序,清楚地观察到了区分“旧”句子和“新”句子的能力。但是,对于修改后的“强制选择”程序,发现了选择更复杂句子的偏见。描述了一个原型学习模型来解释这些结果和以前的数据。